Skip to content

What is the Potential Impact of Reviewing Post-procedure Images With Patients Following Interventional Spine Procedures.

What is the Potential Impact of Reviewing Post-procedure Images With Patients Following Interventional Spine Procedures.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05884684
Enrollment
141
Registered
2023-06-01
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2025-08-15
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

Epidural, Spine procedure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of spine physicians reviewing post-procedural fluoroscopic images with patients. The outcome measure to be assessed will be the potential impact the patient satisfaction and the patient's global impression of change (PGIC) 2 weeks after the spine procedure.

Interventions

OTHERReviewing Imaging with Participant

Post-operatively, the images taken during the procedure will be reviewed with the participant.

Sponsors

University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A spine physician will not discuss images with the first group of participants immediately following their procedure. A spine physician will discuss images with the second group of participants immediately following their procedure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Lumbosacral radiculopathy symptoms * Received transforaminal epidural steroid injection

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who will be sedated for transforaminal epidural steroid injection * Unable to read or understand English-language survey

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Press Gainey Satisfaction (PGS) QuestionnaireUp to 2 hours following procedure in the post-op areaPatient satisfaction as measured by a modified version of the PGS Questionnaire. The questionnaire is comprised of 9 questions measuring general patient satisfaction with the care experience. Each question is on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The lowest possible score of the PGS is 9, and the highest possible score is 45. The lower the total score, the poorer the patient's satisfaction, while the higher the score, the higher the patient's satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)2 weeks following procedureThe PGIC is a scale participants use to rate the level of change they have experienced following treatment. The PGIC is a 7-point scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). After making this selection, participants then rate the percentage of how their condition is following the transforaminal epidural steroid injection compared to before, with 10% being a little better and 100% being very much better.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026