Skip to content

Posteromedial Tibiofemoral Incongruence (PMTFI) Treatment

Posteromedial Tibiofemoral Incongruence (PMTFI) Treatment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05882591
Enrollment
10
Registered
2023-05-31
Start date
2020-10-09
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meniscus; Degeneration, Meniscus Disorder, Meniscus Lesion, Meniscus Tear

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of Posteromedial Tibiofemoral Incongruence (PMTFI) Treatment

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of Posteromedial Tibiofemoral Incongruence (PMTFI) Treatment by the means of published technique (reference nr 1). A decrease in the posterior curvature of the femoral metaphysis close to the medial femoral condyle is one of the anatomical alterations that can be seen within the knee joint. When the knee is fully flexed, this curve is typically concave enough to accommodate the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM). Similar to cam incongruence in the hip joint, a decrease in curvature may cause posteromedial tibiofemoral incongruence, a condition marked by compression of the PHMM in complete knee flexion. If deep knee flexion occurs, clinical symptoms may appear, and PHMM degeneration may be shown to worsen over time. Surgery may be recommended for patients for whom activity modification and conservative therapy have failed. Our team proposed an arthroscopic procedure that allows for the least amount of correction that is still necessary while also providing final intraoperative confirmation of the clinical need to repair posteromedial tibiofemoral incongruence.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPosteromedial Tibiofemoral Incongruence (PMTFI) Treatment by the means of published technique (reference nr 1).

Posteromedial Tibiofemoral Incongruence (PMTFI) Treatment by the means of published technique (reference nr 1).

Sponsors

Artromedical Konrad Malinowski Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single Group Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pain, snapping or discomfort in posterior part of the knee in deep knee flexion during squat * Reduced concavity of the femoral metaphysis proximal to the medial femoral condyle confirmed on MRI * Impingement of posterior horn of medial meniscus with the metaphysis of femur during full knee flexion confirmed arthroscopically

Exclusion criteria

* Active knee inflammation * Chondral injuries ICRS 3-4 * Extraarticular reasons of pain, snapping or discomfort in posterior part of the knee in deep knee flexion during squat * Cyst or avascular changes within the femoral metaphysis adjacent to the planned localization of the procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of pain in full knee flexionAt the 12 month of the follow-upPresence of pain in full knee flexion - deep squat: pain yes/no

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The functional assessment with the The International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire (IKDC)At the 12 month of the follow-upMin of 0 max of 87 points, higher scores mean a better outcome
The functional assessment with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)At the 12 month of the follow-up.Min of 0 max of 100 points, higher scores mean a better outcome

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactKonrad Malinowski, MD PhD
malwin8@wp.pl+48 509812212

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026