Colorectal Cancer, Peripheral Neuropathy
Conditions
Keywords
Rood's approach, Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, Colorectal cancer
Brief summary
Oxaliplatin-induced chronic peripheral neuropathy is of major concern to oncologists and patients as it has been shown to affect patients' health-related quality of life. Although a number of interventions have been implicated, none of them can be recommended for clinical use. This therapeutic failure reflects a poor understanding of the real mechanism of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. However, oxidative stress is identified to be one of the main biomolecular dysfunctions in this neuropathy. Rood's approach is a neurophysiological approach that is based on reflexes of the central nervous system in which the sensory stimulation provides desired muscular response and was specially designed for patients with motor control problems. It was developed by Margeret Rood in 1940. According to Rood, sensory stimulation can activate or deactivate the receptor by facilitation or inhibition, which makes it possible to get the desired muscular response.
Detailed description
So, the purpose of the study is to investigate the efficiency of Rood's approach on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients.
Interventions
OTHERRood's approach
Patients will receive Rood's approach includes various facilitatory and inhibitory techniques.
OTHERTraditional physical therapy program
Participants will be engaged in aerobic exercises and balance training, three times per week for twelve weeks.
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Sixty Patients with colorectal cancer have oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. will be indiscriminately assigned to two groups.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* The patient can participate in the study if they had at least one cycle of oxaliplatin chemotherapy. * Colorectal cancer patients who have oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, the patients included in the study with mild to moderate neuropathy according to mTNS. * Patients from both genders. * Their ages range from 18 to 60 years old.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who had a history of any other neuropathy as diabetic neuropathy. * Patients with an unstable medical condition during chemotherapy. * Patients who are starting new therapy or dose modification during the study period. * Patients with morbid obesity body mass index \>40%. * Patients with a history of non-surgically repaired nerve compression injuries such as carpal tunnel, brachial plexopathy, spinal stenosis, and spinal nerve root compression. * Patients with a history of central nervous system primary or metastatic malignancy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| NCT-CTCAE peripheral neuropathy grading | Change from baseline at twelve weeks after the intervention | It consists of of 5 grades; Grade (1) is asymptomatic may be accompanied by loss of tendon reflex or paraesthesia. Grade (2) is moderate symptoms which limit instrumental activities of daily life Grade (3) is severe symptoms which limit self-care activates of daily life. Grade (4) is life threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade (5) is death. |
| The Ntx-12 questionnaire | Change from baseline at twelve weeks after the intervention | It is comprised of 12 statements intended to measure the severity and impact of peripheral sensory neuropathy on patients' lives. Patients were instructed to complete the Arabic version of the Ntx-12 and choose the number corresponding to how true each statement was for them using a Likert-type scale, with 0 indicating not at all; 1, a little bit; 2, somewhat; 3, quite a bit; and 4, very much. |
| Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Bworst pain | Change from baseline at twelve weeks after the intervention | The BPI-SF assesses pain at its worst, least, average, and now (current pain). Patients respond on 0-to-10 numerical rating scales. Each scale presented as a row of equidistant numbers, where 0 = no pain\^ and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. |
| Total Neuropathy Score | Change from baseline at twelve weeks after the intervention | used to measure these constructs. It includes 6 items graded from 0 to 4 according to the patients' symptoms, the total grade from 0 to 24. The higher grade the worse neuropathy. It graded as mild (1:9), moderate (10:19) and (20:24) severe. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The 4-Stage Balance Test | Change from baseline at twelve weeks after the intervention | is a recommended measure from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) falls campaign to recognize fall risk. An adult who cannot hold tandem stance for 10 seconds is at a higher risk for falls. \[18\] Patient A was able to stand in tandem stance for 2 seconds on each side. Patient B was able to stand on single leg stance for 10 seconds on each side |
Contacts
Primary ContactShaimaa MA El Sayeh, PhD
Outcome results
None listed