Chronic Low-back Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Chronic low back pain, Physiotherapy, Usual care, STOPS, Implementation trial, Bangladesh, Physiotherapist
Brief summary
The goal of this implementation trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with usual physiotherapy care compared to individualized physiotherapy in accordance with the Specific Treatment of Problems of the Spine (STOPS) approach in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the STOPS approach more effective than usual care physiotherapy among patients with CLBP? * Is STOPS physiotherapy cost-effective compared to usual physiotherapy care for patients with CLBP. * Does STOPS training improve the quality of care among Bangladeshi physiotherapists?
Detailed description
The goal of this implementation trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with usual physiotherapy care compared to individualized physiotherapy in accordance with the Specific Treatment of Problems of the Spine (STOPS) approach in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the STOPS approach more effective than usual care physiotherapy among patients with CLBP? * Is STOPS physiotherapy cost-effective compared to usual physiotherapy care for patients with CLBP. * Does STOPS training improve the quality of care among Bangladeshi physiotherapists? In phase I, patients with CLBP will be treated with usual physiotherapy care. In phase II, Bangladeshi physiotherapists will be provided with a STOPS training program by the Australian developers of STOPS. In phase III, the trained Bangladeshi physiotherapists will treat patients using the STOPS approach. Clinical patient outcomes will be evaluated in Phase 1 and Phase 3 (pre and post implementation). Physiotherapists' self-confidence and implementation behaviour will be evaluated before and after STOPS training. A qualitative study of physiotherapists' and patients' experiences will be conducted after the completion of the usual care (Phase I) and STOPS treatment programs (Phase III).
Interventions
In Phase 1, physiotherapists will provide treatment for participants with chronic low back pain in accordance with their current standard physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapists will be free to choose the treatment approach they wish to.
OTHERIndividualized (STOPS) physiotherapy
In Phase 3, participants will receive individualized physiotherapy in accordance with the Specific Treatment of Problems of the Spine (STOPS) approach modified for chronic low back pain. Treatment will be individualized on the basis of biopsychosocial assessment findings including dominant pain type (nociceptive, neuropathic or nociplastic), pathoanatomical subgroups (if any), and other barriers to recovery (eg. inflammation, depression, anxiety, stress, catastrophising, pain self-efficacy, and unhelpful motor control strategies). Available treatment strategies will include individualized education/advice, exercise, manual therapy, activity modification/facilitation, goal setting, motor control optimisation, cognitive-behavioural strategies, inflammation management, pain management strategies, sleep management, work management, and relaxation approaches.
Sponsors
Mohammad Ali
Hasna Hena Pain, Physiotherapy and Public Health Research Center (HPRC)
La Trobe University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Participants will be blinded to the trial hypothesis and knowledge of the fact that two treatment options are being compared.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Physiotherapists: Qualified physiotherapists and physiotherapy assistants in Bangladesh who are involved in low back pain management and working in either or both trial settings will provide the treatment in phases 1 and 3. To be eligible, physiotherapists and physiotherapy assistants must be willing to participate in all phases of the trial (Phases I, II, and III). They must have completed the organised STOPS training course led by the original Australian developers (Jon Ford and Andrew Hahne), where the assessment and treatment protocols will be taught in Phase II. Patients: 1. A primary complaint of either: 1. low back pain, defined as pain between the inferior costal margin and the inferior gluteal fold with or without referral into the leg(s) or 2. referred leg pain, defined as predominately unilateral posterior leg pain extending below the knee, or anterior thigh pain, with or without back pain 2. Duration of the current episode of primary complaint lasting for greater than 3 months (chronic stage of the injury) 3. Aged between 18 and 65 (inclusive) 4. Fluency in English or Bengali sufficient to complete questionnaires and to enable understanding of the intervention 5. Agreeing to refrain from other interventions wherever possible for the 10-week treatment period of the trial, aside from consultations with medical practitioners, medication, and any exercises already being undertaken
Exclusion criteria
Physiotherapist: Not willing to participate in the study for all 3 phases. Patient: 1. Red flag pathologies such as active cancer under current treatment, risk of spinal fracture, signs of potential infection, and major systemic inflammatory disease. 2. Signs of cauda equina syndrome based on bladder or bowel disturbance and/or imaging 3. Current pregnancy, or childbirth within the last 6 months, as this could impair the ability to undertake exercises, and could also cause back and leg symptoms that are not related to the subgroups under investigation 4. Spinal injections within the last 6 weeks, as we wish to study treatment effects independent of the effects of injections 5. Any history of lumbar spine surgery, as there is already considerable research evaluating the efficacy of post-surgical rehabilitation programs 6. A pain intensity score of less than 2/10 on the numerical pain rating scale due to low severity. 7. Minimal activity limitation, evidenced by a baseline ability to perform ALL of (walk, sit, and stand for one hour or more and no sleep disturbance at night), as we wish to exclude people with low severity. 8. Inability to walk safely, such as severe foot drop causing regular tripping, as the interventions in the trial include walking for most participants. 9. Planned absence of more than one week during the treatment period (such as holidays).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Activity limitation | Primary endpoint will be 26 weeks post-enrolment. | Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Measured from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability. |
| Back Pain Intensity | Primary endpoint will be 26 weeks post-enrolment. | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. |
| Leg Pain Intensity | Primary endpoint will be 26 weeks post-enrolment. | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Work hours missed | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Number of work/housework hours missed during the past 7 days (continuous scale from 0 to 50). Lower score indicated less hours missed (better outcome) |
| Work productivity | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | 0-10 numerical rating scale of how much pain affected work productivity in the last 7 days. Score 0-10, with lower scores indicating less interference with work productivity. |
| Short-Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ-SF) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | The total score ranges between 1 and 100, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. |
| Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Utility scores will be calculated from the EuroQOL-5D-5L, with scores ranging from -0.148 to 0.949 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) |
| Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales - DASS-21 | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | The DASS-21 measures symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression, with a total composite score ranging from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of distress. |
| Pain Self Efficacy | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). A raw score is presented with a range from 0 - 60, where high scores indicate greater levels of confidence in dealing with pain (better outcome). |
| Pain Catastrophizing | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The score ranges from 0 to 52. A higher score denotes more catastrophizing (worse outcome) |
| Sleep quality | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-7). Score ranges from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality (worse outcome) |
| Central Sensitisation symptoms | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI-9). Score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more symptoms indicative of potential central sensitisation |
| Inflammatory symptoms | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | The 4-item clinical inflammation score will measure low back-related inflammatory symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more inflammatory symptoms (worse outcome) |
| Treatment Credibility | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Treatment credibility questionnaire. Scored 0-10. A higher score indicates greater confidence in the treatment (better outcome). |
| Healthcare utilization | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | A patient diary will be used to track healthcare service utilization, imaging, and medication. These are recorded descriptively. |
| Participant adherence with treatment | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Participant adherence with treatment will be determined via a self-administered 0-10 rating scale, with higher scores indicating greater adherence with treatment (better outcome). |
| Global rating of change | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Global change will be measured on a 7-point scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much better". Scores range from 1-7, with a higher score indicating greater improvement. |
| Satisfaction with treatment | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Participants will rate their satisfaction with physiotherapy treatment on a 5-point Likert scale, with ratings from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied". |
| Adverse events | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Adverse effects events (harmful or unpleasant) will be recorded descriptively in the therapists clinical notes. |
| Qualitative interviews | 10 weeks post-enrolment | Semi-structured interviews relating to the patient's experiences with the Usual care and STOPS physiotherapy will be conducted. |
| Pain severity | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Brief Pain Inventory. Average of the four pain severity items, scores range from 0-10, lower scores indicate less pain severity. |
| Pain interference | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | Brief Pain Inventory. Average of the seven pain interference items, scores range from 0-10, lower scores indicate less pain interference. |
| Back Pain Intensity | 5, 10 and 52-weeks post enrolment | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. |
| Leg Pain Intensity | 5, 10 and 52-weeks post enrolment | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. |
| Activity limitation | 5, 10 and 52-weeks post enrolment | Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Measured from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability. |
Countries
Bangladesh
Contacts
CONTACTMohammad Ali, MPhil
CONTACTAndrew Hahne, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohammad Ali, MPhil
Uttara Adhunik Medical College Hospital
Outcome results
None listed