Skip to content

Immediate Implant With Different Filling Materials

Comparison Between Different Filling Materials in Immediate Implant

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05878392
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-05-26
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2023-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immediate Implant

Brief summary

36 patients, were included in this study. They were chosen from the Outpatient Clinic in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant.

Interventions

OTHERbone filling materials

the buccal jumping gap was packed using PRF in group 1 the buccal jumping gap was packed using xenograft in group 2 the buccal jumping gap was packed using Alloplastic β-tricalcium phosphate in group 3

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient medically free from systemic diseases. * Age above 18 years. * A single maxillary anterior or premolar tooth that cannot be restored. * No acute infection is present. * Patients with sufficient quality and quantity of bone. * Free from history of bruxism.

Exclusion criteria

* A medical condition that would prevent implant surgery. * Existence of non-treated generalized progressive periodontitis. * Patients who are smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
marginal bone loss1 yearCone Beam CT (CBCT) was used measure marginal bone loss

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant Stability:1 yearResonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to measure implant stability with an Osstell Mentor device.
Peri-implant Pocket depth1 yearA graduated probe was used to measure the distance between the base of the pocket and the gingival margin

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026