Anesthesia, Local
Conditions
Brief summary
The study aims to assess the use of intraligamental local anesthetic injection compared to buccal infiltration for extraction of maxillary molars suffering grade II mobility in terms of pain control and extraction duration.
Interventions
PROCEDUREIntraligamental local anesthetic injection
The intraligamental technique was administered using ligajet intraligamentary jet injector (Micro Mega Company) containing Articaine hydrochloride 4% with adrenaline 1:200000 (ArtPharma Dent, inc, Egypt)
Sponsors
Minia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* healthy patients (class I category according to American society of anesthesiologists ) * Age range: 20 - 60 years of age, * Either genders who are seeking dental extraction of maxillary molar teeth diagnosed with grade II mobility.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with tooth that require trans osseous extraction * Badly broken down coronal structure of the tooth to be extracted * Patients with significant medical conditions * Alcoh intake * Patients on drugs that affect the central nervous systems * Patients who reported the use of drugs that might interfere with pain sensitivity * Pregnant or lactating women * Patients who suffer from hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain using visual analogue scale | immediately after injection | visual analogue scale (VAS) was used in which a pain score was recorded for each patient just after local anesthetic adminstration. The VAS score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme unbearable pain) |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed