Trans-femoral TAVI With Calcified Ilio-femoral Arteries
Conditions
Keywords
TAVI, Calcification, Ilio-femoral arteries
Brief summary
To compare the effectiveness and the safety of femoral-iliac IVL versus balloon only PTA for successful deployment of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis.
Detailed description
Trans-femoral (TF) access has been identified as the best vascular approach for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the most recent European Guidelines for the treatment of valvular heart disease. Nevertheless, the TF approach is not possible in a substantial number of TAVI candidates, mainly due to the presence of important peripheral arterial disease (PAD) that is perceived as a contraindication. The presence of PAD limiting TF-TAVI feasibility has always remained a challenging scenario. The concept of preparing TF access through balloon dilatation in case of PAD had been developed and, in this context, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with plain-balloon has been investigated, although available literature is scarce. Intra-vascular lithotripsy (IVL) was proved effective and safe to treat calcified peripheral arteries and such new technology bares the potential for being applied in TF TAVI in patients with concomitant PAD. The rationale is that the Shockwave IVL balloon inflated at low pressure modifies the vessel rigidity with creation of multiple longitudinal and transversal cracks in the calcium present within the vessel wall. Thus, the improved vessel compliance facilitates the successful passage of the valve delivery system resulting in higher rates of procedural success and lower risk for crossover to surgery, vessel injury and major complications.
Interventions
DEVICETrans-femoral TAVI
Trans-femoral TAVI (Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation) with calcified ilio-femoral arteries via PTA (Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty ) or IVL (Intra-vascular Lithotripsy)
Sponsors
Rede Optimus Hospitalar SA
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age \> 18 years 2. Written informed consent 3. Diagnosis of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis 4. Patient undergoing TAVI according to local institutional protocol and following Heart Team discussion. 5. High-quality Contrast-enhanced ECG gated computed tomography (CT) scan of the heart, aorta and low-limb arteries 6. Calcific severe PAD raising concerns within the Heart Team and judged as arguable for TF approach following angiography or CT-scan evaluation (hostile femoral access), with a RefD\>/=5 mm and a MLD\>/=3 mm. 7. Hostility score \>/= 23 in at least one segment of the axis under evaluation.
Exclusion criteria
1. Life expectancy \< 1 year 2. Subject has active infection requiring antibiotic therapy. 3. STS score ≥8% 4. Leriche syndrome or other forms of total occlusion of the aorta or both iliac axes. 5. Planned target limb major amputation (above the ankle). 6. History of prior endovascular or surgical procedure on the index limb within the past 30 days or planned within 30 days of the index procedure. 7. Subject in whom antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated. 8. Subject has known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated. 9. Subject has known allergy to urethane, nylon, or silicone. 10. Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint. 11. Subject has other medical, social or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment, and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment. 12. The use of specialty balloons, re-entry or atherectomy devices
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility and safety on the trans-femoral (TF) approach | Index procedure - 1 Month | Comparison of feasibility and safety on the TF approach as the composite of: * Valve implant unsuccess due to difficulties in advancing through the ilio-femoral vascular axe * Absence of cross over from PTA to IVL or vice-versa * Absence of severe vascular and bleeding complications at discharge and at 1 month follow up visit, as defined by VARC-3 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Vascular and bleeding complications | Within 30 days after index procedure | 30-day occurrence of vascular and bleeding complications according to the VARC-3 definition |
| Device-related vascular complication | Discharge, 1-months, 6-months | Any device-related vascular complication |
| Residual stenosis, Degree of dissection, Final Flow | Index procedure | Angiographic analysis from DSA |
| Procedural time duration, amount of contrast media and radiation dose. | Index procedure | Procedural analysis |
| MAEs | Within 30 days after index procedure | 30-day composite occurrence of major clinical events: all-cause death, myocardial infarction and stroke |
| Stent Implantation | Index procedure | Need for stent implantation on the procedural vascular access axe. |
| Functional capacity of the inferior limbs | 6-months | Functional capacity of the inferior limbs at 6 months. |
| Patency at the distal level of the vascular access site | 6-months | Ultrasound defined patency at the distal level of the vascular access site after 6 months. |
| Centralized analysis of the angiographic parameters | Index procedure | Centralized analysis of the angiographic parameters |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactAzinwi Phina Muna, phd
Backup ContactCristian Di Biase, Phd
Outcome results
None listed