Skip to content

Atrial Fibrillation Detecting Software Gung Atrial Fibrillation Detecting Software

A Study to Evaluate Accuracy and Validity of the Chang Gung Atrial Fibrillation Detecting Software

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05872516
Enrollment
788
Registered
2023-05-24
Start date
2022-07-11
Completion date
2023-04-10
Last updated
2023-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

artificial intelligence

Brief summary

Chang Gung Atrial Fibrillation Detection Software is an artificial intelligence electrocardiogram signal analysis software that detects whether a patient has atrial fibrillation by static 12-lead ECG signals. This study is a non-inferiority test based on the control group. The main purpose is to verify whether Chang Gung atrial fibrillation detection software can correctly identify atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation, and can be used to provide a reference for doctors to detect atrial fibrillation.

Detailed description

This study is a retrospective study, and the data is from the six hospitals of Chang Gung Medical Research Database (CGRD). We collected de-identified static 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data from the database during the period of January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019. We created a training set and a testing set of ECG data from the CGRD. Then, we stratified and sampled ECG signals from the testing set according to the actual proportion to obtain the experimental sample. The computer first preliminarily screened and selected ECG data that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then numbered them sequentially. A cardiologist confirmed that the sampled ECG data did not include exclusion criteria. The ECG data were converted into images and interpreted for the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation by three cardiologists. Their results were used as the gold standard (reference) for this study. After determining the experimental standards, the ECG signals were inputted into the Chang Gung Atrial Fibrillation Detection software for analysis and interpretation of each ECG data. After the software interpretation was completed, the results were compared with the interpretations of the physicians, and the primary and secondary evaluation indicators were analyzed accordingly.

Interventions

DEVICEChang Gung Atrial Fibrillation Detecting Software

This software is expected to be used in clinical testing to interpret the static 12-lead ECG of adults who are over 20 years old and suspected of having atrial fibrillation, detect whether there is a signal of atrial fibrillation, and output the results for clinicians Near-instant auxiliary diagnostic use.

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Equal or greater than twenty years old * Static 12-lead electrocardiogram of General Electric MUSE XML format file. * The data comes from the static 12-lead electrocardiogram device of General Electric (model MAC5500). * The electrocardiogram signal is 500 Hz. * The Alternating current (AC) filter of the electrocardiogram signal is 60 Hz.

Exclusion criteria

* Cases used in the model development process. * Lacks any electrode. * Contain any electrode lacks a segment. * Misplaced leads

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SensitivitybaselineThe rate of test results that correctly indicate the presence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AccuracybaselineThe rate of all test results that correctly indicate.
Area Under the receiver operating characteristic CurvebaselineA graphical plot that illustrates the diagnostic ability of a binary classifier system as its discrimination threshold is varied.
Positive predictive valuebaselineThe proportions of positive results in statistics and diagnostic tests that are true positive results
SpecificitybaselineThe rate of test results that correctly indicate the absence.
False positive ratebaselineThe rate of test result which wrongly indicates that a particular condition or attribute is present
False negative ratebaselineThe rate of test result which wrongly indicates that a particular condition or attribute is absent
Negative predictive valuebaselineThe proportions of negative results in statistics and diagnostic tests that are true negative results

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026