Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy on Myopia Control Among Children and Adolescents

Real-World Evidence: Effectiveness and Safety of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy on Myopia Control Among Children and Adolescents

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05871840
Enrollment
360
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
2023-06-30
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

Myopia has become one of the leading causes of visual impairment globally and brings a heavy burden on the society. Therefore, preventing and controlling the progression of myopia has become an urgent public health issue that needs to be addressed. The purpose of this study is to provide real-world evidence for identifying the incidence of myopia control (axial length growth rate ≤ 0.1mm/year) after 36-month RLRL therapy, and long-term safety of RLRL therapy in children and adolescents.

Detailed description

The prevalence of myopia in children is increasing worldwide and is viewed as a major public health concern. The current methods for myopia control include medication (e.g., atropine eye drops), optical (e.g., orthokeratology) and environmental interventions (e.g., time outdoors). Nevertheless, these treatments still have limitations. For example, low-concentration atropine may cause systemic side effects and accommodation loss caused by ciliary muscle paralysis. Moreover, the use of orthokeratology in children poses problems such as difficulty wearing, low compliance, and possible complications such as severe corneal infections. Thus, developing the more effective and safe treatment for myopia control in children and adolescents is the future research direction. Recently, repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy has emerged as a treatment for myopia control in children and adolescents, with promising efficacy and safety. It is suggested that continued RLRL therapy sustained promising efficacy and safety in slowing myopia progression within 2 years. However, relevant information on the effectiveness and safety of RLRL therapy on myopia control over 2 years among children and adolescents remain scarce, which deserves to be further explored. In this multicenter observational study, the investigators aim to recruit 360 children aged 7-18 years who have currently accepted RLRL therapy at 3 study centers in China. All participants are randomly selected by stratified sampling based on the treatment duration of RLRL therapy (6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or more). First, the investigators will confirm whether these participants have pre-treatment data (before starting RLRL therapy), including visual acuity, axial length and cycloplegic refraction. Then all the eligible participants who meet the preliminary inclusion criteria, will be invited to come to the corresponding hospitals and further undergo the comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity, measurement of ocular biometric parameters, cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp examination, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), electroretinography (ERG) and questionnaire surveys.

Interventions

OTHERRepeated Low-Level Red-Light (RLRL) Therapy

This treatment device was made by Eyerising SuzhouXuanjia Optoelectronics Technology, which has been on the market and used widely for amblyopia treatment for the past decade in China. This device is certified as a class IIa device by the China National Medical Products Administration. It consists of semiconductor laser diodes, which deliver low-level red light with a wavelength of 650 ±10 nm at an illuminance level of approximately 1600 lux through the pupil to the fundus. Based on calculations completed by an independent lab, the light power going through a 4-mm pupil is 0.29 mW and is classified as class 1 under the International Electrotechnical Commission 60825-1:2014 standard, which is at a level considered safe for direct ocular exposure that would not create retinal thermal hazard.

Sponsors

the Second of Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
First Hospital Affiliated to Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shenzhen Hospital (Guangming), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 7-18 years old 2. Myopia of cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of -1.0D or greater in both of eyes before starting RLRL therapy 3. Participants undergo RLRL therapy currently 4. With complete examination data before starting RLRL therapy, including visual acuity, axial length and cycloplegic spherical equivalence refraction 5. The subject and their guardian voluntarily sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of strabismus, binocular vision abnormalities, other ocular abnormalities in either eye 2. Secondary myopia (such as myopia caused by retinopathy of prematurity or other eye diseases in infancy or early childhood) or myopia associated with systemic syndromes (such as Marfan syndrome) 3. Presence of other significant ocular and/or systemic diseases or abnormalities 4. Medical history of previous eye surgery, laser treatment, or intravitreal injection and so on 5. Participants if investigators believe they have contraindications that make them unsuitable for participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of myopia control after 36-month RLRL therapy36 months or moreValidity index: myopia control was defined as axial length growth rate ≤ 0.1mm/year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incident structural damage of the retina and choroid6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreSafety index
Change of axial length per year after RLRL therapy.6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreValidity index
Change of spherical equivalent refraction per year after RLRL therapy6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreValidity index
Incident visual impairment (logMAR visual acuity < 0.8)6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreSafety index
Incident adverse event6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreSafety index: adverse events including but not limited to dazzling, short-term glare, flash blindness, and delayed afterimages
Incident severe adverse event6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreSafety index: including but not limited to sudden visual loss of \>2 lines occurring or a scotoma perceived to develop in the center of the visual field.
Abnormality of the retinal function6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 months, 36 months or moreSafety index: retinal function is evaluated by electroretinogram (ERG)
The incidence of myopia control after 6-,12- and 24-month RLRL therapy6-12 months, 12-24 months, 24-36 monthsValidity index: myopia control was defined as axial length growth rate ≤ 0.1mm/year

Contacts

Primary ContactXiong Jiping
377721053@qq.com18126081918

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026