Occupational Stress, Validation, Visual Analogue Scale
Conditions
Brief summary
We spend a third of our life at work. Psychosocial risks (PSR) are a major issue in occupational health 1. Approaching the different dimensions of PSR calls on a dozen essential components: workload, autonomy, social support, burnout, anxiety, efforts made, rewards, work addiction, investment, etc. a specific questionnaire which usually contains 20 to 30 questions, so that having an overall view of PSR using the current reference questionnaires (Karasek, Siegrist, etc.) represents a total of more than 300 questions. The response time is thus incompatible with current medical practice (passage in the waiting room before the occupational health medical examination) and leads to a majority of non-responses during anonymous questionnaires on the Internet. On the other hand, these validated questionnaires were carried out by different people and are very heterogeneous between them, including in their formulation, so that the respondents have the impression of disorganization and anarchy. There is therefore a need for short, quick and uniform questionnaires. EVAs offer the incredible advantage of meeting these criteria: speed, uniformity, precision. From a data analysis point of view, EVAs also have the advantage of offering a continuous quantitative response, allowing the use of all statistical approaches. If some questionnaires have already been validated in the form of EVA, such as the EVA stress versus the " Perceived Stress Scale " questionnaire (PSS), the EVA workload and EVA autonomy at work versus the Karasek questionnaire, the other reference questionnaires are not yet validated in EVA (burnout, anxiety, efforts / rewards, work addiction, etc.).
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Inclusion criteria
* All voluntary adults with a professional activity.
Exclusion criteria
* Minor * Person not volunteer to participate. * Protected adults (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Burnout | Inclusion | Burnout on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Anxiety | Inclusion | Anxiety on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Job demand | Inclusion | Job demand on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Job control | Inclusion | Job control on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Social support | Inclusion | Social support on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Job demand / job control / social support | Inclusion | Job demand / job control / social support using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDSC) questionnaire of Karasek. JDSC assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures nine items of job demands, nine items of job control and eight items of social support. Items of JDSC are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, five negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24. |
| Effort-reward imbalance | Inclusion | Effort-reward imbalance on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Work addiction | Inclusion | Work addiction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Life satisfaction | Inclusion | Life satisfaction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic | Once at inclusion | age, gender, marital status, number of children, education level |
| Occupation | Once at inclusion | Question "What is your profession?" |
| Work hours per week | Once at inclusion | Number of hours worked per week |
| Night and weekend work | Once at inclusion | Do you work at night? Do you work weekends? |
| Alcohol consumption | Once at inclusion | Number of alcoholic drinks per week |
| Tabacco consumption | Once at inclusion | Number of cigarettes per day |
| Height | Once at inclusion | Height in cm |
| Weight | Once at inclusion | Weight in kg |
| Sedentary behavior | Once at inclusion | Number of hours sit per day |
| Physical activity | Once at inclusion | Number of hours of physical activity per day |
| Stress at work | Once at inclusion | stress at work level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Ethical conflicts | Once at inclusion | Ethical conflicts confrontation on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from never (0) to often(100) |
| Perceived health | Once at inclusion | Perceived health on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100) |
| Stress at home | Once at inclusion | stress at home level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Fatigue | Once at inclusion | Fatigue level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100) |
| Sleep quality | Once at inclusion | Sleep quality level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100) |
| Mood | Once at inclusion | mood level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100) |
Countries
France
Contacts
CONTACTLise Laclautre
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrédéric Dutheil
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Outcome results
None listed