Skip to content

Electrostimulation and PFMT for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Electrostimulation on Women's Quality of Life and Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05871281
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
2022-01-15
Completion date
2023-01-15
Last updated
2023-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Keywords

stress incontinence, pelvic floor, electrostimulation, muscle training

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the effects of electrostimulation in addition to pelvic floor muscle training and pelvic floor muscle training alone on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, urinary incontinence and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence. The main questions are: What is the effect of electrostimulation combined with pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle function, symptoms of urinary incontinence and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence? What is the effect of pelvic floor muscle training program on pelvic floor muscle function, symptoms of urinary incontinence and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence? Which intervention is more effective - electrostimulation with pelvic floor muscle training or pelvic floor muscle training alone? Participants will be evaluated before and after the interventions with the following methods: International Incontinence Counseling Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) Pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance will be assessed with a Pelvexiser perineometer.

Detailed description

The study involved 24 women 20-49 years old who have complained of stress urinary incontinence for at least 4 weeks, who gave at least one birth vaginally and signed the consent form. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, were diagnosed with vaginismus, urinary tract infections, cancer, epilepsy, pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage I, skin diseases, had undergone previous pelvic floor surgeries, had heart stimulator, or metal implant and were unable to contract the PFM. Study participants were randomly divided into two groups: the I group (n=12), in which participants underwent pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and the II group (n=12) in which subjects received pelvic floor muscle exercises combined with electrostimulation (PFMES).Participants were evaluated before the interventions and repeated after 4 weeks. Before and after the interventions, women's quality of life (QoL) was assessed according to the International Incontinence Counseling Questionnaire - Short Form. Perineometry with Pelvexiser perineometer was used to measure pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance and vaginal resting pressure. Statistical analysis was performed by IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 and Microsoft Excel software 365.

Interventions

Pelvic floor muscle exercises were performed from different body positions. Duration of interventions - 4 weeks. Frequency - 2 times per week, number of individual contact sessions - 8 .

Sponsors

Lithuanian Sports University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

outcomes were measured by gynecologists, intervention done by physiotherapist, who did not know measurements' results

Intervention model description

This study is a four week, single blinded randomized controlled trial with pre-post design comparing PFM training group with PFM electrostimulation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have given birth at least once * Voluntary consent to participate in the study * Do not have concomitant diseases * Do not use hormonal drugs.

Exclusion criteria

* Less than three months have passed after childbirth * Have heart implants or other metal implants * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life by International Incontinence Counseling Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ - SF)Change from Baseline Quality of Life at 4 weeksThe questionnaire consists of four items and the overall score ranges from 0 to 21, with greater values indicating increased symptom severity: 0 - no symptoms of UI, 1-5 scores - mild symptoms of UI, 6-12 scores - moderate symptoms of UI, 13-18 scores - severe symptoms of UI, 19 - 21 scores - and very severe symptoms of UI.
Pelvic floor muscle strength and enduranceChange from Baseline Pelvic floor Muscle Strength and Endurance at 4 weeksPerineometry with Pelvexiser perineometer (mm Hg). The higher the results- the better function of pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance.
Resting vaginal pressureChange from Baseline Resting Vaginal Prressure at 4 weeksPerineometry with Pelvexiser perineometer (mm Hg).

Countries

Lithuania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026