Skip to content

Combining VNS With PT Interventions for Individuals With PD

Combining Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Physical Therapy Interventions for Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05871151
Acronym
VNS-PT-PD
Enrollment
25
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Parkinson's Disease, Exercise, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, VNS, taVNS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combined effects of non-invasive neuromodulation (specifically transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation) with exercise interventions to improve physical function and quality of life in individuals with Parkinsons Disease.

Detailed description

During this clinical trial, participants will be randomized into two groups, with half of the participants assigned to GROUP 1: active taVNS + exercise, and half of the participants assigned to GROUP 2: sham taVNS + exercise. The active taVNS + exercise group will receive 15 minutes of active taVNS prior to treatment. Participants who are randomized into the sham taVNS + exercise group will receive 0 mA of current for 15 minutes prior to treatment. All participants will be guided through exercises by a licensed physical therapist, which will include: 1) intensive exercises that focus on increasing the size and amplitude of movements; 2) task-specific practice, which involves practicing functional tasks, such as dressing, bathing, and cooking, in order to transfer the gains made in therapy to real-life situations. The exercise intervention proposed involves the supervision of a licensed PT at all times during the treatment session. Exercise will be provided in a clinical setting, 45 minutes per session, up to 3 sessions/week, for 4-6 weeks total.

Interventions

DEVICEtaVNS

Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation is a non-invasive method of stimulating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve through the inner ear. Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation will be provided using a commercially available device. The investigators will use custom earbuds that will make the experience significantly more comfortable than traditional transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

BEHAVIORALExercise

All participants will be guided through exercises led by a trained exercise specialist, and will include: 1) intensive exercises that focus on increasing the size and amplitude of movements; 2) task-specific practice, which involves practicing functional tasks, such as dressing, bathing, and cooking, in order to transfer the gains made in therapy to real-life situations. The exercise intervention proposed involves the supervision of a licensed PT at all times during the treatment session. Exercise will be provided in a clinical setting, 45 minutes per session, up to 3 sessions/week, for 4-6 weeks total.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will receive either active or sham taVNS + exercise, but they will not be aware of whether they are receiving the active treatment or the sham treatment.

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial with two parallel groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of PD by a board-certified neurologist * age between 35 and 80 years * no walking aids * stable medication 4 weeks prior to and during the study * no falls in the past 6 months * participant must have MD who is willing to provide oversight and approval for clinically defined OFF state

Exclusion criteria

* mild cognitive impairment (MoCA <25) * self reported depression * antidepressive or antipsychotic medication * participation in a VNS study in the past year * disabling bradykinesia to ensure patients are able to participate in intensive physiotherapy (based on clinical impression and in accordance to UPDRS part III item 14 - to be administered in clinic) * prior history of cardiovascular, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders known to interfere with testing PD features * implanted medical device of any type * history of seizures * peripheral neuropathy including temporal mandibular disorders and Bells Palsy, and * vasovagal syncope.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)In our study, we will utilize the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III. This scale, widely used in the clinical and research settings, helps us evaluate the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The MDS-UPDRS Part III scale ranges from 0 to 132, with 0 representing no motor symptoms and 132 representing severe motor symptoms. Therefore, a higher score on the MDS-UPDRS Part III scale indicates a worse outcome, reflecting more severe motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease.
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT): We utilize the 6-Minute Walk Test in our study to evaluate the functional exercise capacity of our participants. The 6MWT involves participants walking as far as they can in a span of six minutes on a flat, hard surface. The total distance covered in six minutes is recorded as the score. In this test, a greater distance indicates better physical endurance and mobility. Therefore, in our study, a higher score (greater distance walked) on the 6MWT represents a better outcome, signifying superior functional exercise capacity.
Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The 10MWT is a timed walking test commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess an individual's gait speed and functional mobility. It measures the time it takes for a person to walk a distance of 10 meters (approximately 33 feet). The scale title, in this case, is the time in seconds required to complete the 10-meter walk. There are no specific minimum and maximum values for this measure since it depends on the individual's walking ability. However, lower scores (i.e., shorter times) generally indicate better outcomes, as they reflect faster gait speed and improved mobility. Conversely, higher scores (longer times) would suggest slower walking speed and potentially poorer functional mobility.
Mini-Best TestBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and stability. It consists of 14 items that assess different aspects of balance, including anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait, and stability during functional tasks. The scale title for the Mini-BESTest is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores on the Mini-BESTest indicate better balance performance and greater overall stability. A score of 28 represents the best possible outcome, indicating excellent balance abilities across all assessed domains. Conversely, lower scores indicate poorer balance control and increased risk of falls.
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a clinical measure used to assess an individual's walking ability and functional mobility. It evaluates various aspects of gait, including balance, coordination, range of motion, and adaptability. The FGA consists of 10 different tasks or conditions that challenge the person's walking abilities in different ways, such as walking while turning, walking over obstacles, or walking with eyes closed. The scale title for the FGA is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores on the FGA indicate better functional gait performance and greater walking independence. A score of 30 represents the best possible outcome, reflecting excellent gait function across all assessed conditions. Conversely, lower scores suggest impaired gait function and reduced functional mobility.
mCTSIBBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate an individual's sensory integration and balance control. It assesses the person's ability to maintain balance under various sensory conditions. The mCTSIB involves four different standing positions, each with different sensory inputs: (1) feet together on a firm surface with eyes open, (2) feet together on a firm surface with eyes closed, (3) feet together on a foam surface with eyes open, and (4) feet together on a foam surface with eyes closed. The results presented in this section reflect the participant's composite mCTSIB score as measured by the BTrack Balance System. Composite scores range from 0 to 400. Higher scores indicate better balance control and greater sensory integration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Digit Symbol Substitution TestBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The DSST is a test of psychomotor and cognitive functions, including speed of processing, attention, memory, and manual dexterity. The test requires participants to substitute symbols for numbers based on a key, filling in as many blanks as possible within 90 seconds. Scores range from 0-90, and higher scores indicate better function.
FlankerBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test is an NIH Toolbox cognitive assessment of inhibitory control and attention. Participants respond to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli. Raw performance is based on accuracy across congruent and incongruent trials and, for participants with accuracy greater than 80 percent, reaction time is incorporated into the score. Accuracy and reaction time are each converted to a 0-5 subscore using NIH Toolbox scoring algorithms, and these subscores are summed to create a total raw score. This raw score is then converted to an age-adjusted scale score using nationally representative normative data. In this scoring system, a value of 100 represents the population mean for individuals of the same age, with a standard deviation of 15. Higher age-adjusted scale scores indicate better inhibitory control and attention, whereas lower scores represent poorer performance. Scale scores below approximately 85 (one standard deviation below th
MoCABaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely accepted tool in both clinical and research settings, allowing us to evaluate cognitive abilities, specifically focusing on attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The MoCA scale ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of 30 indicating the highest level of cognitive function. Lower scores on the MoCA suggest a higher level of cognitive impairment. Therefore, in the context of our study, a higher score on the MoCA represents a better outcome, signifying superior cognitive performance.
SF-36Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The SF-36 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. It assesses dimensions like physical functioning, role limitations, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health. It provides scores for each dimension and summary scores (PCS and MCS) for overall physical and mental health. Scale titles reflect specific dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. SF-36 offers a comprehensive assessment of perceived health status and well-being.
Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) system assesses health-related quality of life in individuals with neurological conditions. The Neuro-QoL Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scale evaluates a participant's self-reported ability to perform and engage in day-to-day activities. Scores are reported as T-scores, where 50 represents the population mean and 10 represents one standard deviation. Higher T-scores on this scale indicate better perceived ability and therefore reflect a more favorable outcome. Lower T-scores represent worse perceived ability. Clinically meaningful thresholds may include T-scores below approximately 40 (one standard deviation below the mean), which may indicate notably reduced ability to participate in daily activities.
DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OneBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 1 is basic naming of color patches. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 2 is basic reading of color-words printed in black ink. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreeBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 3 is the traditional Stroop task, for which the examinee must inhibit reading the words in order to name the dissonant ink colors in which those words are printed. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
DKEFS Verbal Fluency TestBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)For the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (letter fluency), the examinee is asked to generate words that begin with a particular letter as quickly as possible in 60 seconds. The test measures the examinee's ability to generate words fluently in an effortful, phonemic format. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Digit Span TestBaseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)The Digit Span test is a working memory test in which participants hear a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. There are 14 spans of numbers, and each span is scored '1' (pass) or '0' (fail). Scores range from 0-14, with higher scores indicating better working memory.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at a single academic medical center (UAB) from the Movement Disorders Clinic, local Parkinson support groups, and patient-advocacy channels between May 2023 and September 2024. All screening, intervention, and assessment visits occurred at the WHARF clinical research facility.

Pre-assignment details

44 individuals were screened; 25 attended in-person screening and completed informed consent, and 3 were excluded (cognitive/medical criteria). 22 eligible participants were therefore assigned to study arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active taVNS + Exercise
Participants who are randomized into the active taVNS + exercise group will receive 15 minutes of active taVNS prior to exercise sessions.
10
Sham taVNS + Exercise
Participants who are randomized into the sham taVNS + exercise group will receive 0 mA of current for 15 minutes prior to exercise sessions.
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyUnrelated illness01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham taVNS + ExerciseTotalActive taVNS + Exercise
Age, Continuous69.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15
67.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
64.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.51
Hoehn & Yahr Stage2.80 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
2.70 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
2.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III36.70 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
33.90 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.95
31.00 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Years since diagnosis4.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.05
5.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.18
5.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)

The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a clinical measure used to assess an individual's walking ability and functional mobility. It evaluates various aspects of gait, including balance, coordination, range of motion, and adaptability. The FGA consists of 10 different tasks or conditions that challenge the person's walking abilities in different ways, such as walking while turning, walking over obstacles, or walking with eyes closed. The scale title for the FGA is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores on the FGA indicate better functional gait performance and greater walking independence. A score of 30 represents the best possible outcome, reflecting excellent gait function across all assessed conditions. Conversely, lower scores suggest impaired gait function and reduced functional mobility.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseFunctional Gait Assessment (FGA)Baseline25 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.431876714
active taVNS + exerciseFunctional Gait Assessment (FGA)Post28.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.170509413
active taVNS + exerciseFunctional Gait Assessment (FGA)Follow-up27.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.796823595
sham taVNS + exerciseFunctional Gait Assessment (FGA)Baseline22.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.083843506
sham taVNS + exerciseFunctional Gait Assessment (FGA)Post24.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.438345856
sham taVNS + exerciseFunctional Gait Assessment (FGA)Follow-up24 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.771236166
Primary

mCTSIB

The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate an individual's sensory integration and balance control. It assesses the person's ability to maintain balance under various sensory conditions. The mCTSIB involves four different standing positions, each with different sensory inputs: (1) feet together on a firm surface with eyes open, (2) feet together on a firm surface with eyes closed, (3) feet together on a foam surface with eyes open, and (4) feet together on a foam surface with eyes closed. The results presented in this section reflect the participant's composite mCTSIB score as measured by the BTrack Balance System. Composite scores range from 0 to 400. Higher scores indicate better balance control and greater sensory integration.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exercisemCTSIBFollow-up197.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 68.44981941
active taVNS + exercisemCTSIBBaseline226 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 87.32951646
active taVNS + exercisemCTSIBPost217.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 84.06505417
sham taVNS + exercisemCTSIBPost175.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 59.470254
sham taVNS + exercisemCTSIBFollow-up197.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 76.29249271
sham taVNS + exercisemCTSIBBaseline182.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 71.38907479
Primary

Mini-Best Test

The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and stability. It consists of 14 items that assess different aspects of balance, including anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait, and stability during functional tasks. The scale title for the Mini-BESTest is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores on the Mini-BESTest indicate better balance performance and greater overall stability. A score of 28 represents the best possible outcome, indicating excellent balance abilities across all assessed domains. Conversely, lower scores indicate poorer balance control and increased risk of falls.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseMini-Best TestBaseline22.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.540778533
active taVNS + exerciseMini-Best TestPost-treatment25.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.159501809
active taVNS + exerciseMini-Best TestFollow-up25.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.043961296
sham taVNS + exerciseMini-Best TestBaseline20.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.754996671
sham taVNS + exerciseMini-Best TestPost-treatment22.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.936362073
sham taVNS + exerciseMini-Best TestFollow-up22.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.425395354
Primary

Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III

In our study, we will utilize the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III. This scale, widely used in the clinical and research settings, helps us evaluate the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The MDS-UPDRS Part III scale ranges from 0 to 132, with 0 representing no motor symptoms and 132 representing severe motor symptoms. Therefore, a higher score on the MDS-UPDRS Part III scale indicates a worse outcome, reflecting more severe motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseMovement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIBaseline31.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.68419839
active taVNS + exerciseMovement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIPost-treatment25.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.51279481
active taVNS + exerciseMovement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIFollow-up24.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.969397619
sham taVNS + exerciseMovement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIBaseline36.70 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.602971063
sham taVNS + exerciseMovement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIPost-treatment26.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.51488003
sham taVNS + exerciseMovement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IIIFollow-up32.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.525126262
Primary

Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT): We utilize the 6-Minute Walk Test in our study to evaluate the functional exercise capacity of our participants. The 6MWT involves participants walking as far as they can in a span of six minutes on a flat, hard surface. The total distance covered in six minutes is recorded as the score. In this test, a greater distance indicates better physical endurance and mobility. Therefore, in our study, a higher score (greater distance walked) on the 6MWT represents a better outcome, signifying superior functional exercise capacity.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

Population: One participant in the sham group and one in the active group did not complete the 6MWT at follow-up. One participant in the sham group did not complete the 6MWT at post-test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline1411.94 feetStandard Deviation 137.6766598
active taVNS + exerciseSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Post-treatment1566 feetStandard Deviation 196.4051934
active taVNS + exerciseSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Follow-up1544 feetStandard Deviation 204.1366645
sham taVNS + exerciseSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline1366 feetStandard Deviation 272.5831168
sham taVNS + exerciseSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Post-treatment1448.111111 feetStandard Deviation 323.8643406
sham taVNS + exerciseSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Follow-up1435 feetStandard Deviation 278.8480769
Primary

Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

The 10MWT is a timed walking test commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess an individual's gait speed and functional mobility. It measures the time it takes for a person to walk a distance of 10 meters (approximately 33 feet). The scale title, in this case, is the time in seconds required to complete the 10-meter walk. There are no specific minimum and maximum values for this measure since it depends on the individual's walking ability. However, lower scores (i.e., shorter times) generally indicate better outcomes, as they reflect faster gait speed and improved mobility. Conversely, higher scores (longer times) would suggest slower walking speed and potentially poorer functional mobility.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

Population: Self-selected gait speed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseTen Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Baseline5.022333333 secondsStandard Deviation 0.584714872
active taVNS + exerciseTen Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Post-treatment5.021333333 secondsStandard Deviation 0.671720105
active taVNS + exerciseTen Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Follow-up5.103 secondsStandard Deviation 0.581786204
sham taVNS + exerciseTen Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Baseline5.101666667 secondsStandard Deviation 0.587701633
sham taVNS + exerciseTen Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Post-treatment5.309333333 secondsStandard Deviation 0.810643396
sham taVNS + exerciseTen Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Follow-up5.238 secondsStandard Deviation 0.691324012
Secondary

Digit Span Test

The Digit Span test is a working memory test in which participants hear a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. There are 14 spans of numbers, and each span is scored '1' (pass) or '0' (fail). Scores range from 0-14, with higher scores indicating better working memory.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseDigit Span TestBaseline10.44444444 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.554951619
active taVNS + exerciseDigit Span TestPost10.66666667 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.118033989
active taVNS + exerciseDigit Span TestFollow-up11.33333333 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.802775638
sham taVNS + exerciseDigit Span TestPost9.777777778 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43812314
sham taVNS + exerciseDigit Span TestBaseline9.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.790858092
sham taVNS + exerciseDigit Span TestFollow-up11.33333333 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.549509757
Secondary

Digit Symbol Substitution Test

The DSST is a test of psychomotor and cognitive functions, including speed of processing, attention, memory, and manual dexterity. The test requires participants to substitute symbols for numbers based on a key, filling in as many blanks as possible within 90 seconds. Scores range from 0-90, and higher scores indicate better function.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

Population: One participant in the sham group and one in the active group did not complete the DSST at post-test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseDigit Symbol Substitution TestBaseline37.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.848293704
active taVNS + exerciseDigit Symbol Substitution TestPost41.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.75800402
active taVNS + exerciseDigit Symbol Substitution TestFollow-up39.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.38563056
sham taVNS + exerciseDigit Symbol Substitution TestBaseline39.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.984420171
sham taVNS + exerciseDigit Symbol Substitution TestPost38.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.015063158
sham taVNS + exerciseDigit Symbol Substitution TestFollow-up40.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.583649781
Secondary

DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three

Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 3 is the traditional Stroop task, for which the examinee must inhibit reading the words in order to name the dissonant ink colors in which those words are printed. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

Population: One of the participants in the sham group did not complete CWI-3 at follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreeBaseline10.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.990726407
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreePost11.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.281259921
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreeFollow-up11.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.020301677
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreeBaseline9.666666667 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.645751311
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreePost8.333333333 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.123105626
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition ThreeFollow-up9.625 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.335416016
Secondary

DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One

Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 1 is basic naming of color patches. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

Population: One participant in the sham group did not complete the CWI.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OneBaseline8.888888889 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.713136766
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OnePost10.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.945806813
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OneFollow-up10.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.134042473
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OneBaseline9.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.938414797
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OnePost8.888888889 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96497102
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition OneFollow-up8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.390457219
Secondary

DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two

Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 2 is basic reading of color-words printed in black ink. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoBaseline9.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.259175083
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoPost10.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.951459149
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoFollow-up10.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.263232693
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoBaseline9.111111111 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.848001248
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoPost8.444444444 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.920235911
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition TwoFollow-up8.125 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.313931631
Secondary

DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test

For the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (letter fluency), the examinee is asked to generate words that begin with a particular letter as quickly as possible in 60 seconds. The test measures the examinee's ability to generate words fluently in an effortful, phonemic format. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Verbal Fluency TestBaseline12.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.040077007
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Verbal Fluency TestPost12.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.247875286
active taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Verbal Fluency TestFollow-up12.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.771442829
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Verbal Fluency TestBaseline9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.281259921
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Verbal Fluency TestPost8.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.134042473
sham taVNS + exerciseDKEFS Verbal Fluency TestFollow-up9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.864367132
Secondary

Flanker

The Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test is an NIH Toolbox cognitive assessment of inhibitory control and attention. Participants respond to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli. Raw performance is based on accuracy across congruent and incongruent trials and, for participants with accuracy greater than 80 percent, reaction time is incorporated into the score. Accuracy and reaction time are each converted to a 0-5 subscore using NIH Toolbox scoring algorithms, and these subscores are summed to create a total raw score. This raw score is then converted to an age-adjusted scale score using nationally representative normative data. In this scoring system, a value of 100 represents the population mean for individuals of the same age, with a standard deviation of 15. Higher age-adjusted scale scores indicate better inhibitory control and attention, whereas lower scores represent poorer performance. Scale scores below approximately 85 (one standard deviation below th

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseFlankerBaseline95.75 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.70941483
active taVNS + exerciseFlankerPost102.75 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.05125718
active taVNS + exerciseFlankerFollow-up103.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.10912685
sham taVNS + exerciseFlankerBaseline99.25 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.98075499
sham taVNS + exerciseFlankerPost95.375 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8771824
sham taVNS + exerciseFlankerFollow-up102.375 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.12396176
Secondary

MoCA

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely accepted tool in both clinical and research settings, allowing us to evaluate cognitive abilities, specifically focusing on attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The MoCA scale ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of 30 indicating the highest level of cognitive function. Lower scores on the MoCA suggest a higher level of cognitive impairment. Therefore, in the context of our study, a higher score on the MoCA represents a better outcome, signifying superior cognitive performance.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseMoCABaseline27.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.699794231
active taVNS + exerciseMoCAPost28 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.538591035
active taVNS + exerciseMoCAFollow-up27.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.888562063
sham taVNS + exerciseMoCABaseline26.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.946506843
sham taVNS + exerciseMoCAPost26.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.946506843
sham taVNS + exerciseMoCAFollow-up27.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.969207398
Secondary

Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability)

The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) system assesses health-related quality of life in individuals with neurological conditions. The Neuro-QoL Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scale evaluates a participant's self-reported ability to perform and engage in day-to-day activities. Scores are reported as T-scores, where 50 represents the population mean and 10 represents one standard deviation. Higher T-scores on this scale indicate better perceived ability and therefore reflect a more favorable outcome. Lower T-scores represent worse perceived ability. Clinically meaningful thresholds may include T-scores below approximately 40 (one standard deviation below the mean), which may indicate notably reduced ability to participate in daily activities.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exercisePromise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Baseline47.89 t-scoreStandard Deviation 4.497764877
active taVNS + exercisePromise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Post49.71 t-scoreStandard Deviation 7.116561279
active taVNS + exercisePromise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Follow-up48.95 t-scoreStandard Deviation 5.909925737
sham taVNS + exercisePromise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Baseline52.97 t-scoreStandard Deviation 6.559141204
sham taVNS + exercisePromise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Post48.33 t-scoreStandard Deviation 5.303468467
sham taVNS + exercisePromise Neuro-QOL (Ability)Follow-up48.66 t-scoreStandard Deviation 4.927519096
Secondary

SF-36

The SF-36 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. It assesses dimensions like physical functioning, role limitations, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health. It provides scores for each dimension and summary scores (PCS and MCS) for overall physical and mental health. Scale titles reflect specific dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. SF-36 offers a comprehensive assessment of perceived health status and well-being.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
active taVNS + exerciseSF-36Follow-up69.06944446 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.55656392
active taVNS + exerciseSF-36Baseline67.26388889 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.89936089
active taVNS + exerciseSF-36Post69.31944445 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.07532101
sham taVNS + exerciseSF-36Baseline72.01388889 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.33141466
sham taVNS + exerciseSF-36Post71 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.948168137
sham taVNS + exerciseSF-36Follow-up73.4722222 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.15821345

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026