Parkinson Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Parkinson's Disease, Exercise, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, VNS, taVNS
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combined effects of non-invasive neuromodulation (specifically transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation) with exercise interventions to improve physical function and quality of life in individuals with Parkinsons Disease.
Detailed description
During this clinical trial, participants will be randomized into two groups, with half of the participants assigned to GROUP 1: active taVNS + exercise, and half of the participants assigned to GROUP 2: sham taVNS + exercise. The active taVNS + exercise group will receive 15 minutes of active taVNS prior to treatment. Participants who are randomized into the sham taVNS + exercise group will receive 0 mA of current for 15 minutes prior to treatment. All participants will be guided through exercises by a licensed physical therapist, which will include: 1) intensive exercises that focus on increasing the size and amplitude of movements; 2) task-specific practice, which involves practicing functional tasks, such as dressing, bathing, and cooking, in order to transfer the gains made in therapy to real-life situations. The exercise intervention proposed involves the supervision of a licensed PT at all times during the treatment session. Exercise will be provided in a clinical setting, 45 minutes per session, up to 3 sessions/week, for 4-6 weeks total.
Interventions
Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation is a non-invasive method of stimulating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve through the inner ear. Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation will be provided using a commercially available device. The investigators will use custom earbuds that will make the experience significantly more comfortable than traditional transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation.
All participants will be guided through exercises led by a trained exercise specialist, and will include: 1) intensive exercises that focus on increasing the size and amplitude of movements; 2) task-specific practice, which involves practicing functional tasks, such as dressing, bathing, and cooking, in order to transfer the gains made in therapy to real-life situations. The exercise intervention proposed involves the supervision of a licensed PT at all times during the treatment session. Exercise will be provided in a clinical setting, 45 minutes per session, up to 3 sessions/week, for 4-6 weeks total.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Participants will receive either active or sham taVNS + exercise, but they will not be aware of whether they are receiving the active treatment or the sham treatment.
Intervention model description
Randomized Controlled Trial with two parallel groups
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of PD by a board-certified neurologist * age between 35 and 80 years * no walking aids * stable medication 4 weeks prior to and during the study * no falls in the past 6 months * participant must have MD who is willing to provide oversight and approval for clinically defined OFF state
Exclusion criteria
* mild cognitive impairment (MoCA <25) * self reported depression * antidepressive or antipsychotic medication * participation in a VNS study in the past year * disabling bradykinesia to ensure patients are able to participate in intensive physiotherapy (based on clinical impression and in accordance to UPDRS part III item 14 - to be administered in clinic) * prior history of cardiovascular, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders known to interfere with testing PD features * implanted medical device of any type * history of seizures * peripheral neuropathy including temporal mandibular disorders and Bells Palsy, and * vasovagal syncope.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | In our study, we will utilize the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III. This scale, widely used in the clinical and research settings, helps us evaluate the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The MDS-UPDRS Part III scale ranges from 0 to 132, with 0 representing no motor symptoms and 132 representing severe motor symptoms. Therefore, a higher score on the MDS-UPDRS Part III scale indicates a worse outcome, reflecting more severe motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease. |
| Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT): We utilize the 6-Minute Walk Test in our study to evaluate the functional exercise capacity of our participants. The 6MWT involves participants walking as far as they can in a span of six minutes on a flat, hard surface. The total distance covered in six minutes is recorded as the score. In this test, a greater distance indicates better physical endurance and mobility. Therefore, in our study, a higher score (greater distance walked) on the 6MWT represents a better outcome, signifying superior functional exercise capacity. |
| Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The 10MWT is a timed walking test commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess an individual's gait speed and functional mobility. It measures the time it takes for a person to walk a distance of 10 meters (approximately 33 feet). The scale title, in this case, is the time in seconds required to complete the 10-meter walk. There are no specific minimum and maximum values for this measure since it depends on the individual's walking ability. However, lower scores (i.e., shorter times) generally indicate better outcomes, as they reflect faster gait speed and improved mobility. Conversely, higher scores (longer times) would suggest slower walking speed and potentially poorer functional mobility. |
| Mini-Best Test | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and stability. It consists of 14 items that assess different aspects of balance, including anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait, and stability during functional tasks. The scale title for the Mini-BESTest is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores on the Mini-BESTest indicate better balance performance and greater overall stability. A score of 28 represents the best possible outcome, indicating excellent balance abilities across all assessed domains. Conversely, lower scores indicate poorer balance control and increased risk of falls. |
| Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a clinical measure used to assess an individual's walking ability and functional mobility. It evaluates various aspects of gait, including balance, coordination, range of motion, and adaptability. The FGA consists of 10 different tasks or conditions that challenge the person's walking abilities in different ways, such as walking while turning, walking over obstacles, or walking with eyes closed. The scale title for the FGA is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores on the FGA indicate better functional gait performance and greater walking independence. A score of 30 represents the best possible outcome, reflecting excellent gait function across all assessed conditions. Conversely, lower scores suggest impaired gait function and reduced functional mobility. |
| mCTSIB | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate an individual's sensory integration and balance control. It assesses the person's ability to maintain balance under various sensory conditions. The mCTSIB involves four different standing positions, each with different sensory inputs: (1) feet together on a firm surface with eyes open, (2) feet together on a firm surface with eyes closed, (3) feet together on a foam surface with eyes open, and (4) feet together on a foam surface with eyes closed. The results presented in this section reflect the participant's composite mCTSIB score as measured by the BTrack Balance System. Composite scores range from 0 to 400. Higher scores indicate better balance control and greater sensory integration. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The DSST is a test of psychomotor and cognitive functions, including speed of processing, attention, memory, and manual dexterity. The test requires participants to substitute symbols for numbers based on a key, filling in as many blanks as possible within 90 seconds. Scores range from 0-90, and higher scores indicate better function. |
| Flanker | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test is an NIH Toolbox cognitive assessment of inhibitory control and attention. Participants respond to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli. Raw performance is based on accuracy across congruent and incongruent trials and, for participants with accuracy greater than 80 percent, reaction time is incorporated into the score. Accuracy and reaction time are each converted to a 0-5 subscore using NIH Toolbox scoring algorithms, and these subscores are summed to create a total raw score. This raw score is then converted to an age-adjusted scale score using nationally representative normative data. In this scoring system, a value of 100 represents the population mean for individuals of the same age, with a standard deviation of 15. Higher age-adjusted scale scores indicate better inhibitory control and attention, whereas lower scores represent poorer performance. Scale scores below approximately 85 (one standard deviation below th |
| MoCA | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely accepted tool in both clinical and research settings, allowing us to evaluate cognitive abilities, specifically focusing on attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The MoCA scale ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of 30 indicating the highest level of cognitive function. Lower scores on the MoCA suggest a higher level of cognitive impairment. Therefore, in the context of our study, a higher score on the MoCA represents a better outcome, signifying superior cognitive performance. |
| SF-36 | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The SF-36 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. It assesses dimensions like physical functioning, role limitations, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health. It provides scores for each dimension and summary scores (PCS and MCS) for overall physical and mental health. Scale titles reflect specific dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. SF-36 offers a comprehensive assessment of perceived health status and well-being. |
| Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) system assesses health-related quality of life in individuals with neurological conditions. The Neuro-QoL Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scale evaluates a participant's self-reported ability to perform and engage in day-to-day activities. Scores are reported as T-scores, where 50 represents the population mean and 10 represents one standard deviation. Higher T-scores on this scale indicate better perceived ability and therefore reflect a more favorable outcome. Lower T-scores represent worse perceived ability. Clinically meaningful thresholds may include T-scores below approximately 40 (one standard deviation below the mean), which may indicate notably reduced ability to participate in daily activities. |
| DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 1 is basic naming of color patches. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance. |
| DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 2 is basic reading of color-words printed in black ink. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance. |
| DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 3 is the traditional Stroop task, for which the examinee must inhibit reading the words in order to name the dissonant ink colors in which those words are printed. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance. |
| DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | For the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (letter fluency), the examinee is asked to generate words that begin with a particular letter as quickly as possible in 60 seconds. The test measures the examinee's ability to generate words fluently in an effortful, phonemic format. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance. |
| Digit Span Test | Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment) | The Digit Span test is a working memory test in which participants hear a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. There are 14 spans of numbers, and each span is scored '1' (pass) or '0' (fail). Scores range from 0-14, with higher scores indicating better working memory. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited at a single academic medical center (UAB) from the Movement Disorders Clinic, local Parkinson support groups, and patient-advocacy channels between May 2023 and September 2024. All screening, intervention, and assessment visits occurred at the WHARF clinical research facility.
Pre-assignment details
44 individuals were screened; 25 attended in-person screening and completed informed consent, and 3 were excluded (cognitive/medical criteria). 22 eligible participants were therefore assigned to study arms.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active taVNS + Exercise Participants who are randomized into the active taVNS + exercise group will receive 15 minutes of active taVNS prior to exercise sessions. | 10 |
| Sham taVNS + Exercise Participants who are randomized into the sham taVNS + exercise group will receive 0 mA of current for 15 minutes prior to exercise sessions. | 10 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Unrelated illness | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Sham taVNS + Exercise | Total | Active taVNS + Exercise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69.50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15 | 67.20 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 | 64.80 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.51 |
| Hoehn & Yahr Stage | 2.80 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 | 2.70 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75 | 2.50 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85 |
| Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | 36.70 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 33.90 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.95 | 31.00 Scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 10 Participants | 19 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 16 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Years since diagnosis | 4.80 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.05 | 5.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.18 | 5.20 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a clinical measure used to assess an individual's walking ability and functional mobility. It evaluates various aspects of gait, including balance, coordination, range of motion, and adaptability. The FGA consists of 10 different tasks or conditions that challenge the person's walking abilities in different ways, such as walking while turning, walking over obstacles, or walking with eyes closed. The scale title for the FGA is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores on the FGA indicate better functional gait performance and greater walking independence. A score of 30 represents the best possible outcome, reflecting excellent gait function across all assessed conditions. Conversely, lower scores suggest impaired gait function and reduced functional mobility.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Baseline | 25 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.431876714 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Post | 28.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.170509413 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Follow-up | 27.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.796823595 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Baseline | 22.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.083843506 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Post | 24.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.438345856 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) | Follow-up | 24 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.771236166 |
mCTSIB
The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate an individual's sensory integration and balance control. It assesses the person's ability to maintain balance under various sensory conditions. The mCTSIB involves four different standing positions, each with different sensory inputs: (1) feet together on a firm surface with eyes open, (2) feet together on a firm surface with eyes closed, (3) feet together on a foam surface with eyes open, and (4) feet together on a foam surface with eyes closed. The results presented in this section reflect the participant's composite mCTSIB score as measured by the BTrack Balance System. Composite scores range from 0 to 400. Higher scores indicate better balance control and greater sensory integration.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | mCTSIB | Follow-up | 197.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 68.44981941 |
| active taVNS + exercise | mCTSIB | Baseline | 226 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 87.32951646 |
| active taVNS + exercise | mCTSIB | Post | 217.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 84.06505417 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | mCTSIB | Post | 175.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 59.470254 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | mCTSIB | Follow-up | 197.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 76.29249271 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | mCTSIB | Baseline | 182.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 71.38907479 |
Mini-Best Test
The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and stability. It consists of 14 items that assess different aspects of balance, including anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait, and stability during functional tasks. The scale title for the Mini-BESTest is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores on the Mini-BESTest indicate better balance performance and greater overall stability. A score of 28 represents the best possible outcome, indicating excellent balance abilities across all assessed domains. Conversely, lower scores indicate poorer balance control and increased risk of falls.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Mini-Best Test | Baseline | 22.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.540778533 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Mini-Best Test | Post-treatment | 25.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.159501809 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Mini-Best Test | Follow-up | 25.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.043961296 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Mini-Best Test | Baseline | 20.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.754996671 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Mini-Best Test | Post-treatment | 22.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.936362073 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Mini-Best Test | Follow-up | 22.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.425395354 |
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III
In our study, we will utilize the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III. This scale, widely used in the clinical and research settings, helps us evaluate the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The MDS-UPDRS Part III scale ranges from 0 to 132, with 0 representing no motor symptoms and 132 representing severe motor symptoms. Therefore, a higher score on the MDS-UPDRS Part III scale indicates a worse outcome, reflecting more severe motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Baseline | 31.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.68419839 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Post-treatment | 25.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.51279481 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Follow-up | 24.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.969397619 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Baseline | 36.70 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.602971063 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Post-treatment | 26.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.51488003 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III | Follow-up | 32.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.525126262 |
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT): We utilize the 6-Minute Walk Test in our study to evaluate the functional exercise capacity of our participants. The 6MWT involves participants walking as far as they can in a span of six minutes on a flat, hard surface. The total distance covered in six minutes is recorded as the score. In this test, a greater distance indicates better physical endurance and mobility. Therefore, in our study, a higher score (greater distance walked) on the 6MWT represents a better outcome, signifying superior functional exercise capacity.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
Population: One participant in the sham group and one in the active group did not complete the 6MWT at follow-up. One participant in the sham group did not complete the 6MWT at post-test.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Baseline | 1411.94 feet | Standard Deviation 137.6766598 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Post-treatment | 1566 feet | Standard Deviation 196.4051934 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Follow-up | 1544 feet | Standard Deviation 204.1366645 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Baseline | 1366 feet | Standard Deviation 272.5831168 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Post-treatment | 1448.111111 feet | Standard Deviation 323.8643406 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Follow-up | 1435 feet | Standard Deviation 278.8480769 |
Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
The 10MWT is a timed walking test commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess an individual's gait speed and functional mobility. It measures the time it takes for a person to walk a distance of 10 meters (approximately 33 feet). The scale title, in this case, is the time in seconds required to complete the 10-meter walk. There are no specific minimum and maximum values for this measure since it depends on the individual's walking ability. However, lower scores (i.e., shorter times) generally indicate better outcomes, as they reflect faster gait speed and improved mobility. Conversely, higher scores (longer times) would suggest slower walking speed and potentially poorer functional mobility.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
Population: Self-selected gait speed
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Baseline | 5.022333333 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.584714872 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Post-treatment | 5.021333333 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.671720105 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Follow-up | 5.103 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.581786204 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Baseline | 5.101666667 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.587701633 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Post-treatment | 5.309333333 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.810643396 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Follow-up | 5.238 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.691324012 |
Digit Span Test
The Digit Span test is a working memory test in which participants hear a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. There are 14 spans of numbers, and each span is scored '1' (pass) or '0' (fail). Scores range from 0-14, with higher scores indicating better working memory.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Digit Span Test | Baseline | 10.44444444 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.554951619 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Digit Span Test | Post | 10.66666667 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.118033989 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Digit Span Test | Follow-up | 11.33333333 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.802775638 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Digit Span Test | Post | 9.777777778 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.43812314 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Digit Span Test | Baseline | 9.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.790858092 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Digit Span Test | Follow-up | 11.33333333 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.549509757 |
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
The DSST is a test of psychomotor and cognitive functions, including speed of processing, attention, memory, and manual dexterity. The test requires participants to substitute symbols for numbers based on a key, filling in as many blanks as possible within 90 seconds. Scores range from 0-90, and higher scores indicate better function.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
Population: One participant in the sham group and one in the active group did not complete the DSST at post-test.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Baseline | 37.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.848293704 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Post | 41.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.75800402 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Follow-up | 39.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.38563056 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Baseline | 39.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.984420171 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Post | 38.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.015063158 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Follow-up | 40.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.583649781 |
DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 3 is the traditional Stroop task, for which the examinee must inhibit reading the words in order to name the dissonant ink colors in which those words are printed. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
Population: One of the participants in the sham group did not complete CWI-3 at follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Baseline | 10.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.990726407 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Post | 11.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.281259921 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Follow-up | 11.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.020301677 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Baseline | 9.666666667 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.645751311 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Post | 8.333333333 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.123105626 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three | Follow-up | 9.625 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.335416016 |
DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 1 is basic naming of color patches. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
Population: One participant in the sham group did not complete the CWI.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Baseline | 8.888888889 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.713136766 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Post | 10.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.945806813 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Follow-up | 10.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.134042473 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Baseline | 9.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.938414797 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Post | 8.888888889 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.96497102 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One | Follow-up | 8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.390457219 |
DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test is used to assess cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Condition 2 is basic reading of color-words printed in black ink. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Baseline | 9.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.259175083 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Post | 10.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.951459149 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Follow-up | 10.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.263232693 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Baseline | 9.111111111 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.848001248 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Post | 8.444444444 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.920235911 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two | Follow-up | 8.125 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.313931631 |
DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test
For the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (letter fluency), the examinee is asked to generate words that begin with a particular letter as quickly as possible in 60 seconds. The test measures the examinee's ability to generate words fluently in an effortful, phonemic format. All D-KEFS raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3, corrected for each of the following 16 age-groups:8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Baseline | 12.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.040077007 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Post | 12.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.247875286 |
| active taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Follow-up | 12.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.771442829 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Baseline | 9.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.281259921 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Post | 8.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.134042473 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test | Follow-up | 9.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.864367132 |
Flanker
The Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test is an NIH Toolbox cognitive assessment of inhibitory control and attention. Participants respond to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli. Raw performance is based on accuracy across congruent and incongruent trials and, for participants with accuracy greater than 80 percent, reaction time is incorporated into the score. Accuracy and reaction time are each converted to a 0-5 subscore using NIH Toolbox scoring algorithms, and these subscores are summed to create a total raw score. This raw score is then converted to an age-adjusted scale score using nationally representative normative data. In this scoring system, a value of 100 represents the population mean for individuals of the same age, with a standard deviation of 15. Higher age-adjusted scale scores indicate better inhibitory control and attention, whereas lower scores represent poorer performance. Scale scores below approximately 85 (one standard deviation below th
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Flanker | Baseline | 95.75 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.70941483 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Flanker | Post | 102.75 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.05125718 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Flanker | Follow-up | 103.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.10912685 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Flanker | Baseline | 99.25 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.98075499 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Flanker | Post | 95.375 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8771824 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Flanker | Follow-up | 102.375 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.12396176 |
MoCA
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely accepted tool in both clinical and research settings, allowing us to evaluate cognitive abilities, specifically focusing on attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The MoCA scale ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of 30 indicating the highest level of cognitive function. Lower scores on the MoCA suggest a higher level of cognitive impairment. Therefore, in the context of our study, a higher score on the MoCA represents a better outcome, signifying superior cognitive performance.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | MoCA | Baseline | 27.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.699794231 |
| active taVNS + exercise | MoCA | Post | 28 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.538591035 |
| active taVNS + exercise | MoCA | Follow-up | 27.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.888562063 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | MoCA | Baseline | 26.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.946506843 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | MoCA | Post | 26.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.946506843 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | MoCA | Follow-up | 27.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.969207398 |
Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability)
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) system assesses health-related quality of life in individuals with neurological conditions. The Neuro-QoL Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scale evaluates a participant's self-reported ability to perform and engage in day-to-day activities. Scores are reported as T-scores, where 50 represents the population mean and 10 represents one standard deviation. Higher T-scores on this scale indicate better perceived ability and therefore reflect a more favorable outcome. Lower T-scores represent worse perceived ability. Clinically meaningful thresholds may include T-scores below approximately 40 (one standard deviation below the mean), which may indicate notably reduced ability to participate in daily activities.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Baseline | 47.89 t-score | Standard Deviation 4.497764877 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Post | 49.71 t-score | Standard Deviation 7.116561279 |
| active taVNS + exercise | Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Follow-up | 48.95 t-score | Standard Deviation 5.909925737 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Baseline | 52.97 t-score | Standard Deviation 6.559141204 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Post | 48.33 t-score | Standard Deviation 5.303468467 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability) | Follow-up | 48.66 t-score | Standard Deviation 4.927519096 |
SF-36
The SF-36 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. It assesses dimensions like physical functioning, role limitations, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health. It provides scores for each dimension and summary scores (PCS and MCS) for overall physical and mental health. Scale titles reflect specific dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. SF-36 offers a comprehensive assessment of perceived health status and well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active taVNS + exercise | SF-36 | Follow-up | 69.06944446 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.55656392 |
| active taVNS + exercise | SF-36 | Baseline | 67.26388889 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.89936089 |
| active taVNS + exercise | SF-36 | Post | 69.31944445 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.07532101 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | SF-36 | Baseline | 72.01388889 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.33141466 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | SF-36 | Post | 71 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.948168137 |
| sham taVNS + exercise | SF-36 | Follow-up | 73.4722222 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.15821345 |