Skip to content

Identifying Ideal Reimbursement "Dose" to Reduce Clinical Trial-related Financial Toxicity

Identifying Ideal Reimbursement "Dose" to Reduce Clinical Trial-related Financial Toxicity

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05871125
Enrollment
39
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
2023-07-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the feasibility and preliminary impact of a pilot financial reimbursement intervention for women with breast cancer living in the Deep South who are eligible for a clinical trial. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can we recruit and retain patients on a clinical trial to a reimbursement study? 2. What is the preliminary impact of participation in a reimbursement study on patient financial hardship? Participants will receive a monthly reimbursement to compensate for their trial-incurred expenses. Researchers will use surveys and interviews to explore the impact of receiving reimbursement on trial-related outcomes and financial hardship for participating patients.

Detailed description

This convergent, mixed methods, pilot, feasibility, single-arm trial will provide financial reimbursement to therapeutic clinical trial-eligible women with breast cancer at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. We hypothesize that optimal reimbursement for trial-related expenses is feasible and will decrease patient financial toxicity and increase trial retention. The rationale is that understanding the impact of reimbursement for trial-related costs will aid in addressing socioeconomic barriers to trial participation, thus allowing for more diversity in trial enrollment and ensuring equitable efficacy of cancer treatments when used in real-world clinical settings. Feasibility benchmarks will be defined as 80% retention of consented patients in the reimbursement study and retained patients completing at least 75% of bi-weekly surveys while enrolled. Feasibility will also be assessed by the patient-reported acceptability (as measured by the AIM; scored 1-5, higher scores indicate greater acceptability) and appropriateness (as measured by the IAM; scored 1-5, higher scores indicate greater appropriateness) of the financial reimbursement. Preliminary impact data will be captured: 1. using bi-weekly surveys that include patient-reported financial toxicity (as measured by the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity \[COST\]), material financial hardship (13 domains, including trouble paying for medical expenses or basic needs), and behavioral financial hardship (12 domains, including postponing or skipping recommended care). 2. using videocall-based semi-structured interview to explore effects of the financial reimbursement on trial recruitment, retention, and financial hardship.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALReimbursement

Patients will be dosed in cohorts of 5, with a maximum available sample size of 30. The first cohort of 5 patients will be enrolled at the first reimbursement dose level of $1000 per month for 4 months ($4000 per patient in total). At the end of the 4-month period, reimbursement dose suitability will be determined as suitable by a cumulative negative financial toxicity screen and reimbursement dose deemed acceptable and appropriate in at least 4 patients. If the reimbursement dose is found suitable, we will de-escalate the reimbursement dose for the next cohort of 5 patients. If the reimbursement dose is found unsuitable, the next cohort of 5 patients will be enrolled at the same reimbursement amount ($1000 per month for 4 months).

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER
Breast Cancer Research Foundation of Alabama
CollaboratorOTHER
Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham Women's Breast Health Fund
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be women with breast cancer currently enrolled in the Investigation of Serial studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular AnaLysis (I-SPY TRIAL 2) at the UAB Medical Oncology Clinic.

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speakers * Males * Females without cancer * Female cancer patients not enrolled in the I-SPY TRIAL 2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Receive All Reimbursements and Who Complete Follow-up Surveys (Overall Feasibility of Intervention)2 yearsNumber of patients who receive all reimbursements: 80% retention of patients Number of retained patients who patients who complete surveys: 75% of survey completion while enrolled

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCourtney Williams, DrPH

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous52 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 330 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 19, 2026