Refractory Leukemia
Conditions
Keywords
refractory AML, allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Brief summary
The investigators developed a protocol combining chemotherapy of cladribine, cytarabine and etoposide (CLAGE) as debulking treatment sequential with reduced intensity conditioning regimen Flu-Bu to treat patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, the aim is to further evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the protocol with modifications: 1) reduced dose of CLAGE; 2) Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen as fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan (MBF) or total marrow irradiation (TMI); 3) Venetoclax was added to the chemotherapy and conditioning regimen.
Detailed description
Refractory AML is associated with poor prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is considered as the only curative therapy. Unfortunately, conventional transplantation protocol usually has high relapse rate and high nor-relapse mortality. In previous studies, the investigators established a protocol using intensive chemotherapy (cladribine, cytarabine and etoposide) to reduced the leukemia burden followed by reduced intensity conditioning regimen of Flu-Bu3 with 7 day interval. All patients received maintenance therapy. The 1-year relapse rate was less than 20% but toxicity such as lethal infection was documented in sizable part of patients. In this study, the aim is to further evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the protocol with following modifications: 1) dose of cytarabine and etoposide are reduced to 1g/m2 and 100mg/m2 daily; 2) conditioning regimen is based on Flu-Bu2 combined with addition of melphalan (100mg/m2) or total marrow irradiation (TMI) in case of contra-indication for busulfan or melphalan; 3) Venetoclax is added to the chemotherapy and conditioning regimen. The modifications intend to reduce both the toxicities and relapse, which may turn into a benefit of disease-free survival (DFS). This is designed as a phase II multi-center prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the protocol.
Interventions
Intensive chemotherapy Cladribine-cytarabine-etoposide -venetoclax sequential with fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan or fludarabine and total marrow irradiation
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients with refractory AML: no remission after 2 induction therapy, relapsed AML within 6 months of 1st CR, relapse AML fail to having CR after reinduction therapy, multiple relapse and refractory relapse AML * patients with \>5% bone marrow blast by morphology or by LAIP flowcytometry at enrollment * patients with HLA-matched sibling donor, 9-10/10 matched unrelated donor or haplo-identical family donor * patients without active infection * informed consent provided
Exclusion criteria
* patients with abnormal liver function (enzyme \>2N or bilirubin \>2N) * patients with abnormal renal function (Scr \>1.5N) * patients with poor cardiac function (EF\<45%)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| disease-free survival (DFS) | 2 year | patients remain alive in remission without disease progression or relapse |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival (OS) | 2 year | patients remain alive |
| non-relapse mortality (NRM) | day 100 | patients died without evidence of disease |
| complete remission (CR) | day 60 | patients achieve clinical remission after transplantation |
| relapse | 2 year | patients fail to achieve remission or had disease relapse |
| GRFS | 2 year | patients remain alive without relapse, without grade III-IV aGVHD and moderate to severe cGVHD |
| non-relapse mortality | 2 year | patients died without evidence of disease |
Countries
China