Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Versus Propofol for Deep Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Versus Propofol for Deep Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05870514
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2023-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Deep sedation, Fospropofol, Propofol, Intensive care unit

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium for injection compared to propofol for deep sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, open-label, small sample study using fospropofol disodium and propofol for deep sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Subjects are randomized to different treatment groups (including 1 for fospropofol disodium and 1 for propofol). Remifentanil is co-administered with fospropofol or propofol. Efficacy and safety profiles of fospropofol disodium and propofol are to be monitoted.

Interventions

Patients in the experimental group received fospropofol disodium for injection at an initial infusion rate of 10 mg/kg/h and adjusted to maintain a Narcotrend index between 13 and 64.

DRUGPropofol

Propofol

Sponsors

Xiaobo Yang, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years; Expected to require deep sedation ≥8 hours; Requirement for deep sedation (a Narcotrend index between 13 and 64).

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \<18 or \>30 kg/m2; Contraindicate or allergic to study drugs; Moribund state; Expected to have a general anesthesia within 8 hours; Myasthenia gravis; Acute hepatitis or serious hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C); Chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 29 ml/min/1.73m2; Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after appropriate intravenous volume replacement and continuous infusions of 2 vasopressors; Acute severe neurological disorder and any other condition interfering with RASS assessment; Pregnancy or lactation; Unstable angina; Acute myocardial infarction; Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%; Heart rate less than 50 beats/min; Second- or third-degree heart block in the absence of a pacemaker; Alcohol abuse or drug abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedationFrom start of study to 48 hoursThe percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse eventsFrom start of study to 48 hoursIncidence rate of adverse events
7-day ventilator free timeFrom start of study to 7 days7-day ventilator free time
Success rate of extubation within 7 daysFrom start of study to 7 daysSuccess rate of extubation within 7 days
Length of ICU stayFrom start of study to 28 daysLength of ICU stay
28-day mortalityFrom start of study to 28 days28-day mortality

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaobo Yang
want.tofly@aliyun.com13720311349
Backup ContactYou Shang
you_shanghust@163.com15972127819

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026