Type 2 Diabetes
Conditions
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, treatment burden
Brief summary
The main objective of this study is to develop and evaluate a clinic-based pilot intervention to optimize patient-centered diabetes care for low income patients at risk for low quality diabetes care and poor outcomes.
Detailed description
Single arm trial of a brief screening tool to identify areas of treatment burden in patients with diabetes, which will then be used as a tool in a primary care clinician visit discussion. We will assess (primary outcome) the acceptability and feasibility of 1. recruitment and retention processes; 2. screening tool usability; and (secondary outcomes) 3. outcome assessments. Data will include systematic tracking of recruitment and retention efforts, baseline and follow-up participant data, post-visit surveys of clinicians and participants, and patient participant qualitative interviews.
Interventions
OTHERscreening tool
The screening tool identifies areas of treatment burden in patients with type 2 diabetes. The tool is in the form of a brief questionnaire that the patient completes prior to a clinical appointment. The patient's responses to the questionnaire are then included in the discussion with the patient's primary care clinician during the clinical visit.
Sponsors
Hennepin Health Care
University of Minnesota
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older, a diagnosis of T2DM, receiving primary care in a participating clinic, and having an in-person clinic visit with a participating trained clinician.
Exclusion criteria
* Cognitive impairment, residing in a nursing home, and pregnancy (to avoid recruiting patients with gestational diabetes).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of the clinical trial | Baseline to 6 month follow up | Patients' willingness to participate in the study as assessed by: 1\) percentage of approached and eligible patients who consent to enroll in the study, 2) percentage of participants who completed the study procedures including baseline survey data collection, 3) use of the screening tool and completion of the post-intervention visit survey 4) time (days) to recruit 50 subjects across 2 clinic sites. |
| Acceptability | Baseline to 6 month follow up | Helpfulness and utility of the intervention screening tool as assessed by 1) patient post intervention surveys and clinician post intervention surveys to identify patterns of patient and clinician participants' impressions of the helpfulness and utility of the intervention, and 2) acceptability of the intervention using qualitative interviews. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HbA1c | Baseline and 6 month follow up | Change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed