Skip to content

A Comparison of the Effects of Krill Oil and Fish Oil Supplementation on Muscle Function in Older Adults

A Comparison of the Effects of Krill Oil and Fish Oil Supplementation on Muscle Function in Older Adults: a Randomised Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05869526
Enrollment
61
Registered
2023-05-22
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2024-04-01
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcopenia

Keywords

muscle mass, strength, omega-3, ageing

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effects of Krill Oil and Fish Oil supplementation on muscle function in older adults. The secondary aim is to investigate the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects previously observed.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTFish oil

EPA rich fish oil

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTKril oil

Superba Krill Oil

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVegetable oil

Mixed vegetable oil

Sponsors

University of Glasgow
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Supplements will be identical in look and taste

Intervention model description

1:1:1 basis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Older adults (aged 60 years or older). BMI less than 30kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Participants (diagnosed and being treated for a pre-existing medical condition (cancer, kidney disease, liver disease, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, gait disturbances limiting the ability to perform assessments of muscle function, dementia, affecting muscles known to use drugs (e.g., steroids). History of allergy to fish or fish oil and regular consumption of more than1portion of oily fish per week or use of fish oil or krill oil supplements will also be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in knee extensor maximal isometric torque ( MVC)Change from baseline to 16 weeksKnee extensor maximal isometric torque measured during a maximal voluntary contraction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in lean massChange from baseline to 16 weeksWhole body lean mass measured by measured via bio-electrical impedance
Blood sampleChange from baseline to 16 weeksRed Blood Cell Omega-3 levels
Change in Grip strengthChange from baseline to 16 weeksGrip strength measured with a hand held dynamometer
Change in Muscle thicknessChange from baseline to 16 weeksVastus lateralis muscle thickness measured by ultrasound
Change in fat massChange from baseline to 16 weeksWhole body fat mass measured by measured via bio-electrical impedance
Neuromuscular Junction (NMJ)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured by iEMG
Change in gait speedChange from baseline to 16 weeksTime taken to walk 4 metres at a normal walking pace
Change in Chair rise timeChange from baseline to 16 weeksA 30-second sit-to-stand test measured functional abilities
Force steadiness during submaximal isometric knee extensor contractionsChange from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured by using intramuscular iEMG

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toe In/ Out (deg)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Distance (CM)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Ambulation Time (Sec)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Velocity (CM/Sec)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Mean Normalized VelocityChange from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Double Support (%GC)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Cadence (Steps/Min)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Step Time Differential (Sec)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Step Length Differential (CM)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Cycle Time Differential (Sec)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Number of StepsChange from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Swing (%GC)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Stance (%GC)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Step/ Extremity RatioChange from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Step Time (Sec)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Cycle Time (Sec)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Step Length (CM)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Stride Length (CM)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
H-H Base Support (CM)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat
Single Support (%GC)Change from baseline to 16 weeksMeasured during a 4m walk using a gaitrite mat

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026