Skip to content

The Boston Pace Study

Left Bundle Area Pacing Vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Normal Left Ventricular Function -The Boston Pace Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05869500
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-05-22
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Keywords

left bundle branch, left bundle

Brief summary

Right ventricular (RV) pacing can cause left ventricular systolic dysfunction in 10- 20% of patients. Biventricular pacing had previously been shown to prevent left ventricular systolic dysfunction. However, implantation of coronary sinus lead increases procedural risk and can be limited by higher threshold and phrenic nerve capture. HIS pacing has been evaluated as an alternative pacing strategy, but its routine use was limited by difficulty of the procedure, success rate and high pacing threshold. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a promising physiologic pacing technique that has been proposed as a pacing strategy to prevent pacing induced cardiomyopathy and for treatment of desynchrony in heart failure. LBBAP has been adopted widely and performed routinely on patients with AV block. Currently, it is up to the discretion of the proceduralist whether LBBAP is performed given that there is lack of evidence to guide pacing strategies.

Detailed description

This pilot trial is a feasibility study that will assess for efficacy, safety and success rate of left bundle branch area pacing. The study will also examine the recruitment rate at 2 major tertiary hospitals. The study will examine if the use of LBBAP can prevent the occurrence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) compared to RV pacing among patients with normal left ventricular function and high-grade AV block. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of pacing induced cardiomyopathy is lower with LBBAP compared to RV pacing in patients with normal left ventricular function requiring high burden of RV pacing.

Interventions

DEVICELeft Bundle Branch Area Pacemaker

Implantation of Medtronic 3830 lead for left bundle branch area pacing

DEVICERight Ventricular Pacemaker

Implantation of a conventional right ventricular pacemaker lead

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 2. Patients with complete AV block, high-grade AV block with an anticipated ventricular pacing rate of more than 40% 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% or more. 4. Echocardiogram within the last 3 months

Exclusion criteria

1. History of systolic dysfunction with LV EF of less than 50% 2. Prior myocardial infarction 3. Obstructive coronary artery disease 4. Severe valvular dysfunction 5. Life expectancy of less than a year 6. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)12 months
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV)12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of LBBAP30 days
All-cause mortality12 months
Cardiovascular mortality12 months
Rate of heart failure related visit: defined as heart failure hospitalization or emergency room visit or urgent visit requiring intravenous heart failure therapy12 months
Number of participants with upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy12 months
New York Heart Association Class I-IV (IV is worst)12 months
Number of participants with occurrence of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation on echocardiogram12 months
Number of participants with occurrence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation on echocardiogram12 months
Number of participants with new onset atrial fibrillation12 months
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) (score of 8-40)12 months
Paced QRS duration on 12 lead EKGEvaluated at 1 day, 30 days and 12 months
Pacing percentage12 months
Complication rate including pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, infection, and lead revision12 months
Procedure time1 day
Fluoroscopy time1 day
Pacing capture threshold (V)12 months
R wave amplitude (mV)12 months
RV lead impedance (ohms)12 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 14, 2026