Skip to content

Effect of Concurrent and Aerobic Exercise on VO2max, Strength, and Body Composition in Overweight and Obese Adults

Concurrent and Aerobic Exercise Programs Based on the Polarized Training Intensity Distribution Model on Maximal Oxygen Consumption, Strength, and Body Composition in Overweight and Obese Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05867498
Enrollment
28
Registered
2023-05-22
Start date
2023-04-17
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2023-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

Obesity, Concurrent exercise, Combined training, Circuit-Based Exercise, Cardiorespiratory fitness, Muscle Strength, Body Composition

Brief summary

Concurrent and aerobic physical exercise are recognized strategies for the treatment of overweight and obesity. The interventions of these modalities have been performed with cardiovascular machines or guided execution in their majority, making it possible to improve the health of this population; however, the studies have used high-cost equipment that is not very accessible to the general population. For this reason, we propose to compare the effects of two 12-week programs: concurrent vs. aerobic, using an innovative methodology with musicalized and outdoor activities, little approached by research. The polarized training intensity distribution model, usually used in sports and now applied to physical activity to improve VO2max, muscular strength, and body composition, will be used to determine which intervention is superior in improving these variables.

Detailed description

Twenty-eight people (women and men) will be randomly assigned to a concurrent exercise group (intervention group) and an aerobic exercise group (comparator group), with fourteen people per group. These interventions will be performed for 12 weeks, 3 times per week, with a duration of 60 minutes per session. The first 8 minutes will be of general and specific joint mobility preparing the participants for the central part which will be 47 minutes, and will end with 5 minutes of return to calm. The concurrent exercise group sessions will have two components, lasting 47 minutes. One of them will be strength exercises with a time of 23 minutes, to perform 7 exercises. In the first four weeks, it will be a general circuit, composed of 2 sets, 15 to 18 repetitions, for 60 seconds, with micro-pauses of 10 seconds between exercises, and 3 minutes between sets. In weeks 5 to 8, it will be a block circuit, consisting of 3 sets, 12 to 15 repetitions, for 45 seconds, with micro-pauses of 10 seconds between exercises and 70 seconds between sets. For weeks 9 to 12, it will be a concentrated circuit, consisting of 3 sets, 8 to 12 repetitions, for 35 seconds, with micro-pauses of 15 seconds between exercises and 110 seconds between sets. The aerobic component will have a duration equal to the strength component (24 minutes). A variable continuous method will be applied for the first 18 minutes through rumba-aerobic (ballroom and folkloric dance steps), at an intensity lower than the ventilatory threshold 1 (VT 1). For the remaining 6 minutes, an intervallic method will be used at an intensity \> VT 2, with combat gestures (fists, knees, and plantar flexions). Progression of the loads during the 12 weeks of intervention: Weeks 1 and 2: 5 loads of 30 seconds and 30 seconds of recovery. Weeks 3 and 4: 4 loads of 45 seconds and 45 seconds of recovery. Weeks 5 to 7: 5 loads of 50 seconds and 25 seconds of recovery. Week 8: 4 loads of 60 seconds and 30 seconds of recovery. Weeks 9 to 11: 3 loads of 70 seconds and 35 seconds of recovery. Week 12: 4 loads of 80 and 40 seconds of recovery. The aerobic group, will perform the same methods, rumba steps, combat gestures, intensities, and time of the central part of the aerobic component of the concurrent exercise group, but will be differentiated by performing in the continuous method for a duration of 36 minutes and in the interval method will have the following progression: Weeks 1 and 2: 2 blocks by 5 loads of 35 seconds and 35 seconds of recovery. Weeks 3 and 4: 2 blocks by 4 loads of 45 seconds and 45 seconds of recovery. Weeks 5 to 8: 2 blocks by 4 loads of 60 seconds and 30 seconds of recovery. Weeks 9 to 11: 2 blocks by 3 loads of 75 seconds and 37.5 seconds of recovery. Week 12: 2 blocks by 4 loads of 80 seconds and 40 seconds of recovery. All participants will have their maximal oxygen consumption, muscle strength, and body composition evaluated before the beginning of week 1 and at the end of week 12.

Interventions

Strength component (circuit-based exercise) and aerobic component (based on musicalized and outdoor activities).

BEHAVIORALAerobic exercise

Low-to-moderate-intensity continuous training and interval training based on musicalized and outdoor activities.

Sponsors

Universidad de Antioquia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 59 years old. * BMI \>25.0. * Waist circumference ≥85cm in women, and ≥94cm in men. * Individuals participating voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. * Uncontrolled psychiatric problems. * People under treatment with anticoagulants, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and bronchodilators. * Having osteo-muscular problems that may affect participation in exercise sessions. * Pregnant women. * People with a nutritional plan for weight loss. * Smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in maximal oxygen consumptionBaseline and 12-weeksA graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer (ERGO-FIT, Germany) will obtain maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) using a METAMAX 3B gas analyzer (CORTEX, Germany). VO2max will be reported in ml/kg/min.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mean propulsive velocityBaseline and 12-weeksMean propulsive velocity (m/s), will be assessed by a progressive half squat test on a Smith machine, with a T-Force System linear encoder (ERGOTECH, Spain).
Change in maximum velocityBaseline and 12-weeksMaximum velocity (m/s), will be assessed by a progressive half squat test on a Smith machine, with a T-Force System linear encoder (ERGOTECH, Spain).
Change in peak maximum powerBaseline and 12-weeksPeak maximum power (W), will be assessed by a progressive half squat test on a Smith machine, with a T-Force System linear encoder (ERGOTECH, Spain).
Change in body fatBaseline and 12-weeksBody fat (%), will be obtained using an InBody 270 body composition analyzer (InBody, USA).
Change in muscle massBaseline and 12-weeksMuscle mass (kg), will be obtained using an InBody 270 body composition analyzer (InBody, USA).
Change in visceral fat levelBaseline and 12-weeksVisceral fat level (\>10 high, \<10 low), will be obtained using an InBody 270 body composition analyzer (InBody, USA).
Change in body weightBaseline and 12-weeksBody weight (kg), will be obtained using an InBody 270 body composition analyzer (InBody, USA).
Change in waist circumferenceBaseline and 12-weeksWaist circumference (cm), will be obtained using a tape measure (SECA).

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026