Skip to content

Perfusion Estimation For Optimal Treatment Strategy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Perfusion Estimation for Optimal Revascularization and Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome - a Randomized Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05865600
Acronym
PERFORM-CCS
Enrollment
570
Registered
2023-05-19
Start date
2023-05-23
Completion date
2027-09-01
Last updated
2025-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia, Stable Angina

Keywords

Myocardial Ischemia, Angina Pectoris, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Angiography, Computed Tomography Angiography, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Brief summary

We will establish a cohort of 570 symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome patients undergoing 15O-water PET and assess their symptoms through repeated questionnaires. Two hundred patients with abnormal perfusion will be randomized to immediate or delayed referral to invasive coronary angiography with concomitant optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy with repeated 15O-water PET and questionnaires at 3 and 6 months. The primary objective is to compare the potential benefit of early invasive coronary angiography (ICA) versus guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) on symptomatic relief defined as freedom of angina after 3 months following a positive \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT in patients with symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is highly prevalent in Western countries and an emerging disease in developing countries around the globe. While the Danish incidence rate of IHD for both females and males has been declining during the last 15 years, the prevalence has stabilized at 165,000 patients in 2018 due to enhanced survival. Ischemic heart disease is caused by atherosclerotic plaque formation in the epicardial coronary arteries, abnormalities in the coronary microcirculation, spasms in the vessel wall, or a combination thereof. This may result in chest discomfort or dyspnoea leading to frequent primary care consultations and admissions on the suspicion of acute coronary syndrome. To emphasize the chronic nature of the disease, the European Society of Cardiology has replaced the previous nomenclature of stable coronary artery disease with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) in their latest guidelines from 2019. When cardiac imaging is used to diagnose and select treatment in patients with CCS, guidelines recommend non-invasive functional imaging modalities in patients with an intermediate or high clinical likelihood of IHD or in patients with prior revascularization. In patients with prior myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention, studies have found higher diagnostic accuracy of \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT with measurement of absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion to diagnose obstructive coronary artery disease compared with single-photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Current European guidelines recommend myocardial revascularization in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in CCS patients with large areas of ischemia (≥ 10%) in the left ventricle to improve prognosis. Since the publication of these guidelines, a large randomized trial of initial invasive versus conservative strategy in patients with moderate-severe ischemia on stress testing has been published with no observed prognostic benefit of an initial invasive strategy in these patients. However, patients assigned to an initial invasive strategy had a greater improvement in angina-related health status as compared with a conservative strategy, with larger differences observed in patients who were more symptomatic at baseline. The study is limited by the high use of stress ECG (25% of participants) which has a very low diagnostic power and the high proportion of asymptomatic participants at baseline (35%). It is unknown whether the results of MPI with absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion can improve the selection of patients with an additional symptomatic benefit of an initial invasive strategy compared with GDMT. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic CCS referred for clinically indicated \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT will be included in a prospective cohort and assessed with questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months. Clinical outcomes will be assessed through national registries. Patients with abnormal perfusion and a clinical indication for ICA will undergo coronary CT angiography and a six-minute walking test. Hereafter, they will be randomized 1:1 to immediate referral to ICA or 3 months delayed referral to ICA. Both groups will undergo optimization of GDMT with consultations every two weeks. At 3 and 6 months, both groups will undergo repeated questionnaires, \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT and a six-minute walking test. Enrollment in the cohort study and randomized trial will continue until 200 randomized patients have reached the 3 months assessment.

Interventions

OTHEROptimization of guideline-directed medical therapy

Consultation every second week with optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy according to 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndrome. Focus will be on risk-factor modification and anti-anginal medication with the treatment aim to achieve freedom from angina and dyspnea with a heart rate at rest ≤ 60 beats/min and systolic blood pressure \> 100 mmHg.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTImmediate referral for invasive coronary angiography

Immediate referral for invasive coronary angiography

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST3-months delayed referral for invasive coronary angiography

3-months delayed referral for invasive coronary angiography

OTHERStandard of care

Standard of care

Sponsors

Gødstrup Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Patients will be blinded to the specific result of the initial \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT. The result will be reported as normal, abnormal, or suspicion of unprotected left main coronary stenosis (exclusion criteria) until the termination of the study. Investigators and invasive coronary angiography operators are not blinded to the specific result of the initial \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT in order to evaluate clinical indication for invasive coronary angiography. The coronary CT angiography will only be evaluated for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis - the rest of the coronary CT angiography as well as the two additional \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT scans at 3 and 6 months assessment will only be analyzed after the termination of the study. Investigators will be blinded to the results of baseline, 3, and 6 month questionnaires and walking distances until the termination of the study.

Intervention model description

All eligible patients are included in a prospective cohort with repeated questionnaires. Patients with abnormal perfusion and clinical indication for invasive coronary angiography are randomized 1:1 in permuted blocks with random varying sizes of 4,6 and 8 to either immediate invasive coronary angiography or delayed invasive coronary angiography via a standard computerized random-number generator stratified for age ≥70 years and sex (REDcap). Proper concealment of randomization is obtained by the use of an external randomization service (Clinical Trial Unit, Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 18 years 2. Willing to participate and able to understand, read and sign the informed consent document before the planned procedure 3. Known ischemic heart disease defined as one of the following 1. Previous myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 2. Previous coronary computed tomography angiography or invasive coronary angiography documenting atherosclerosis. 4. Undergoing clinically indicated \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT due to chest discomfort or dyspnea as angina equivalent Additional inclusion criteria for randomized trial: 5. Initial \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT with abnormal perfusion defined as all of the following 1. Hyperemic myocardial blood flow (hMBF) ≤2.3 mL/min/g in at least two adjacent myocardial segments 2. Relative hMBF ≤ 65% in at least two adjacent segments as compared with the mean hMBF of the two adjacent segments with the highest mean hMBF 3. Tissue perfusion defect extent ≥ 5% based on indices of relative hypoperfusion 6. Clinical indication for invasive coronary angiography decided at a multidisciplinary conference between consultants in nuclear medicine and cardiology

Exclusion criteria

1. Ongoing acute coronary syndrome or acute coronary syndrome within 30 days 2. Contraindications for adenosine 1. Severe asthma 2. Advanced atrioventricular block without pacemaker 3. Severe aortic stenosis 3. Patients not able to breath hold (severe COPD/asthma) 4. Pregnant women, including women who are potentially pregnant or lactating 5. Allergy to iomeron 6. Life expectancy of less than 2 years 7. Severe valvular disease 8. Reduced kidney function with an estimated glomerular filtrations rate \<40 ml/min 9. Inability to consent Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptomatic reliefAfter 3 months following a positive [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTSeattle Angina Questionnaire-7 angina frequency score = 100 (0-100 with higher scores indicating less frequent angina)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Walking capacity3 and 6 months after randomizationMeters walked in six-minute walking test
Angina frequency3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTSeattle Angina Questionnaire-7 angina frequency score (0-100 with higher scores indicating less frequent angina)
Physical limitation3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTSeattle Angina Questionnaire-7 physical limitation score (0-100 with higher scores indicating less physical limitation)
Quality of life-score3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTSeattle Angina Questionnaire-7 quality of life score (0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life)
Health status3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTSeattle Angina Questionnaire-7 summary score (0-100 where 0 denotes the lowest reportable health status and 100 the highest)
Work Ischemic Symptom score3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTWork Ischemic Symptom score summary score. The scoring system is currently under development.
Hyperemic myocardial blood flow3 and 6 months after randomizationGlobal and territorial hyperemic myocardial blood flow (ml/g/min) of perfusable myocardium on \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT.
Myocardial flow reserve3 and 6 months after randomizationGlobal and territorial myocardial flow reserve (unitless measure) on \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT.
Dyspnea3, 6, 12, 60, and 120 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTRose Dyspnea Scale. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea
Coronary revascularization3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTPercutaneous coronary intervention and/or coronary artery bypass grafting
Myocardial infarction3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTAll myocardial infarctions
All-cause mortality3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTAll deaths
Cardiovascular mortality3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTAll cardiovascular deaths
Unstable angina3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTUnstable angina
Unplanned hospitalization3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTAny hospitalization requiring overnight stay not electively planned
De novo heart failure3 and 6 months after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTNew diagnosis of heart failure
Use of CCTA, MPI, and ICA10 years after randomization or index [15O]H2O cardiac PET/CTUse of coronary CT angiography, myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive coronary angiography
Coronary flow capacity3 and 6 months after randomizationCoronary flow capacity incorporates hyperemic myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve into a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from myocardial steal indicating very poor coronary flow capacity to normal coronary flow capacity. All data is derived from \[15O\]H2O cardiac PET/CT.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactJacob H Søby, MD
jasoeb@rm.dk61659131

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026