Skip to content

Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive AVR

Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05864625
Enrollment
64
Registered
2023-05-18
Start date
2023-06-29
Completion date
2025-06-10
Last updated
2025-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Remimazolam

Keywords

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Remimazolam

Brief summary

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Detailed description

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension due to reduced cardiac contractility and vasodilation. This can be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse in extreme cases. Remimazolam is a relatively new anesthetic agent and it is a ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with a context sensitive half time of 7.5 minutes. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. Previous studies have also shown that remimazolam can be safely used in patients with severe aortic stenosis and in cardiac anesthesia induction and during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is no definite data on comparison of hemodynamic variables between remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and conventional propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. Therefore, this study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Interventions

DRUGRemimazolam besylate

During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1\ 4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.

DRUGPropofol/ Sevoflurane

During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1\ 4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.

Sponsors

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 19 years old * Patients with severe aortic stenosis, undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known allergy to benzodiazepine, flumazenil, propofol * Patients with galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption * Patients with hypersensitivity to Dextran40 * Patients who have been taking benzodiazepine for long term * Patients with whom heart rate assessment is not accurate, such as atrial fibrillation * Patients with end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis * Patients with history of acute angle glaucoma * Patients with valve disease severity of grade III or higher, other than aortic valve * Emergency operation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used.Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesiaTotal dose of vasopressors and inotropics used during anesthesia will be compared between two groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypotension and bradycardia event durationStart of anesthesia to end of anesthesiaHypotension and bradycardia event duration will be compared
Extubation timeEnd of anesthesia to extubationExtubation time between the two groups will be compared
Emergence agitationArrival of patient at ICUEmergence agitation will be compared between the two groups using Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale upon arrival at ICU. The Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale uses a numeric score from 1 (unarousable) to 7 (dangerous agitation)to assess the level of patient sedation and identifies seven levels of sedation and agitation, which range from deep sedation (unarousable) to dangerous agitation.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026