Skip to content

Comparison of Patients' Satisfaction Between Dexmedetomidine and Remimazolam Anesthesia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation

Comparison of Patients' Satisfaction Between Dexmedetomidine and Remimazolam Anesthesia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05864404
Enrollment
142
Registered
2023-05-18
Start date
2023-05-24
Completion date
2024-10-09
Last updated
2023-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether remimazolam administration for sedation had a positive effect on patients' satisfaction compared to dexmedetomidine administration in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Catheter ablation can be used when the cause of atrial fibrillation is in the pulmonary veins. However, the procedure takes 2 to 4 hours, and patients complain of considerable discomfort. Remimazolam has the advantage of having no drug interaction with CYP3A4 and shorter elimination half-life, duration of action, and shorter recovery time than midazolam, a previously used drug. In addition, compared to dexmedetomidine, side effects such as bradycardia and hypotension are expected to be less. In addition, even if unexpected deep sedation is induced, complete reversal using flumazenil is possible, so the risk of re-sedation could be low. In other words, when remimazolam is used instead of a drug previously used as a sedative in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing catheter ablation, effects such as rapid action and recovery, reduced complications, improved safety, and improved patient satisfaction can be expected. Therefore, this study was designed to confirm the hypothesis that administration of remimazolam would improve satisfaction in patients undergoing catheter ablation compared to dexmedetomidine.

Interventions

In the case of remimazolam, the bolus is prepared in a 30cc syringe by mixing 0.075mg/kg and normal saline to make a total of 25mL. Inject the bolus at a rate of 150 cc/h, and measure the sedation depth every 2 to 3 minutes, stopping the infusion when the target sedation depth (RASS -1 to -2 points) is reached. Remimazolam is then infused at 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/hr to maintain the target depth of sedation until the end of the procedure. Remifentanil was infused at a rate of 1.2-7.2 mcg/kg/h.

In the case of dexmedetomidine, the bolus is prepared in a 30cc syringe by mixing 1.0mcg/kg and normal saline to make a total of 25mL. Inject the bolus at a rate of 150 cc/h, and measure the sedation depth every 2 to 3 minutes, stopping the infusion when the target sedation depth (RASS -1 to -2 points) is reached. Dexmedetomidine is then infused at 0.4 to 0.8 mcg/kg/h to maintain the target depth of sedation until the end of the procedure. Remifentanil was infused at a rate of 1.2-7.2 mcg/kg/h.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 20-79 years, gender not limited * Patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation who require monitored anesthetic care (MAC). * Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1,2,3.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification \>3. * Patients with a history of psychiatric disorders * Patients with myocardial infarction or stroke within the past year * Patients with a history of major vascular surgery or cardiac surgery within the past year * Patients with reduced liver function, chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or higher) * Patients diagnosed with heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction \<40% * Patients who need vasopressor or oxygen therapy due to unstable vital signs before procedure. * Patients with fever (\>38°) or severe uncontrolled high blood pressure * Patients with a history of drug hypersensitivity during previous anesthesia * Patients who are unable to communicate and have cognitive impairment * Patients with a history of drug or alcohol addiction * Patients with a history of obstructive sleep apnea

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The satisfaction levels of the patientsImmediately after the procedureThe satisfaction levels of the patients was assessed with a 5-point numerical scale (0=extremely dissatisfied, 1=dissatisfied, 2=neutral, 3=satisfied, and 4=extremely satisfied).

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactSarah Soh
yeonchoo@yuhs.ac82-2-2228-8512

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026