Skip to content

FES and Upper Limb Loading Exercises Outcome Comparison on Hand Function in Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Effects Of Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Upper Limb Loading Exercises on Grip Strength,Dexterity and Function in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05863988
Acronym
OCONHAND
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-05-18
Start date
2023-02-25
Completion date
2023-10-30
Last updated
2023-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

Dexterity,Functional Electrical Stimulation,Hand Function

Brief summary

This study is conducted to assess the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation Vs limb loading exercises on hand grip strength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute cervical spinal cord injury.

Detailed description

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is based on the concept that rehabilitative training recruits neuronal systems spinal cord injury that remain intact after the injury to take over the impaired function.Working in the field of rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured, presents many challenges. Every patient presents a new and specific challenge. The tetraplegics more so than the paraplegics as the result of loss of active function of their upper extremities in addition to loss of function in the trunk and lower extremities. This study will be conducted to assess the effects of functional electrical stimulation versus limb loading exercises on hand grip strength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. trength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. The study will be randomized clinical trial. Participants will be randomly allocated in to two groups each group will have ten participants.. This study will be conducted in two Hospitals in Punjab pakistan. The group A Will receive functional electrical stimulation .The group B will receive upper limb loading exercises .Both groups will be given 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks. The outcomes will be measured before and after giving treatment by using modified Action Research Arm Test (ARAT),Hand held dynamometry , Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). The results will be calculated by using SPSS 23 version . Statistical tests will be applied according to the normality of the data either it will be parametric or non-parametric.

Interventions

OTHERFunctional Electrical Stimulation

The group A will receive functional electrical stimulation 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks.

OTHERUpper Limb Loading Exercises

The group B will receive Upper Limb Loading Exercises 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with incomplete SCI at neurological level C5-T1 in subacute stage. * Medically stable * Able to tolerate the Functional Electrical stimulation without sustained autonomic dysreflexia * A score greater than 16 in mini-mental test

Exclusion criteria

* Patients taking long term steroids * patient having pre-existing injury on upper limb or hand * Patients have had Previous participation in experimental trial for spinal cord injury * Patients using Currently cardioactive medications * Individuals who has had Tendon transfers, implanted devices bladder stimulation, chronic intrathecal infusions * Individuals with Bleeding disorders. * Amputation of any digit on target hand

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Action Research Arm Test8th weekThe ARAT has excellent reliability and low ceiling effects. It consists of 4 subtests, including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. All tasks were scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where 0 reflects poor hand function and 3 reflects good hand function (maximum score, 57).
Hand Held Dynamometry8th weekA small portable device is held by the examiner and placed against the patient's limb .during a maximal isometric contraction. The device can be used to test hand muscle strength efficiently
9 peg hole test8th weekNine-Hole Peg Test is administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into holes on the board as quickly as possible. Participants must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container.. The number of seconds it takes for the patient to complete the test.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactHira Jabeen, MS NMPT
hira.jabeen@riphah.edu.pk03234116506
Backup ContactAroosa Razaq, DPT
arosad556@gmail.com03070079835

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026