Skip to content

Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia

Postoperative Pain and Recurrences After Totally Extraperitoneal Endoscopic (TEP) vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Prospective Randomized Multi-center Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05863624
Enrollment
170
Registered
2023-05-18
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain

Brief summary

This randomized study compares open inguinal hernia repair (Lichtenstein hernioplasty) to endoscopic repair (TEP) in terms of chronic pain and recurrences in one and five years after operation.

Detailed description

The best operative technique in female inguinal hernia is not known. Some register studies recommend always laparoscopic hernia repair in females, but there are no randomized studies to show that laparoscopic repair is better than open hernioplasty. Our study compares operative complications, chronic pain and recurrences in Lichtenstein operation to totally endoscopic hernia repair (TEP) in 170 female patients with primary inguinal hernia. The patients are operated in six Finnish hospitals, randomized into 85 Lichtenstein vs 85 TEP and followed 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 months and 5 years. Main end-point in postoperative pain after one year, sencondary endpoints are sick leave, return to normal physical activity, complications of treatment, re-operations, chronic pain and costs of treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen hernioplasty

Inguinal hernia is operated using open surgery

PROCEDURETEP hernioplasty

Inguinal hernia is operated using laparoendoscopic technique

Sponsors

Helsinki University Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
North Karelia Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Jyväskylä Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Mikkeli Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Kuopio University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized follow-up study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary inguinal hernia in females

Exclusion criteria

* emergency operation * recurrent hernia * groin pain without hernia * frail and sick patient ASA ≥ 4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chronic painfrom 1 week to one yearPostoperative inguinal pain (vas scores 0-10) after 1 week, 4 weeks and one year of surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications1 monthPostoperative complications of surgery (wound infection, hemorrhage)
Recurrence5 yearsHernia recurrences after 5 years
Sick leave0-30 dayshow many days the patient is not working after surgery
Treatment costs0-30 dayshow much in euros the surgical treatment will cost

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactHannu EK Paajanen, MD
paajanen@surffi.fi0405263101

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026