Skip to content

Biomarkers in Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Cryoballoon Ablation

Biomarkers in Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Cryoballoon Ablation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05862038
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-05-17
Start date
2023-02-10
Completion date
2024-09-10
Last updated
2023-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Our study will include consecutive patients undergoing pulsed field ablation (PFA) or cryoballoon (CBA) ablation. Tissue injury and inflammation markers will be measured before and after the procedure.

Detailed description

Study population: The participants with symptomatic atrial fibrillation scheduled for PFA or CBA procedures Biomarkers of interest: high-sensitive troponin, CRP, NT-proBNP Data collection: Blood samples will be collected at baseline, immediately after the procedure, 24 hours after, and three months after. Statistical analysis: Comparisons of biomarker levels between PFA and CBA groups. Results: Comparison of biomarker levels between PFA and CBA groups at each time point. Changes in biomarker levels over time within each group. Correlation analysis between biomarker levels and clinical outcomes, such as AF recurrence, LA stiffness, complications, and hospitalization.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Ana Jordan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. * Age between 18 and 75 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior atrial fibrillation ablation. * History of significant bleeding or thromboembolic events within the last 6 months. * History of severe renal or liver disease. * History of malignancy within the last 5 years. * History of autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency. * Significant mitral stenosis or other significant valvular heart disease. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To see if PFA vs CBA increase left atrium stifness by measuring NT-proBNP values after proceduresOne year

Countries

Croatia

Contacts

Primary ContactAna Jordan
anazovko4@gmail.com00385986113086

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026