Skip to content

Acute Cardiac Dysfunction in Critical Illnes

Aetiology and Clinical Importance of Acute Cardiac Dysfunction in Critical Illness

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05860504
Enrollment
592
Registered
2023-05-16
Start date
2023-05-29
Completion date
2026-03-30
Last updated
2023-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiomyopathy, Stress, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Multi Organ Failure, Myocardial Infarction, Right Ventricular Dysfunction, Tako Tsubo Cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

The overall aim of the study is to establish the clinical importance of cardiac dysfunction, by estimating its incidence and impact on short- and long-term outcomes, in a mixed population of critically ill patients with multi-organ failure. Pathogenesis of cardiac dysfunction in critical illness and key molecules linked to this will be explored.

Detailed description

During critical illness, the heart is exposed to extreme external stressors, which may contribute to heart failure. There is a lack of knowledge of what happens to the heart over the course of critical illness. The few studies available suggest that LV dysfunction is common in critical illness, with a prevalence of 10-30%. Notably, LV regional hypokinesia is a frequent pattern of LV dysfunction among these patients and is associated with a higher risk of death. LV regional hypokinesia during critical illness may have several possible aetiologies, including ischemic, inflammatory or other/mixed processes. Of these, acute coronary artery obstruction is probably most important. Patients with sepsis, for example, and acute ST elevation myocardial infarction have twice the risk of death. Type II myocardial infarction can also lead to LV dysfunction due to insufficient coronary artery flow e.g., from tachycardia, hypotension and hypoxia, resulting in myocardial ischemia. In the absence of CAD, LV regional hypokinesia could also result from myocardial inflammation secondary to systemic inflammatory response, direct toxic effects of cytokines or pathogenic infiltration. Another possible aetiology is Takotsubo syndrome, an acute cardiac condition characterised by reversible regional hypokinesia, usually in the apical portion of the LV. The current paradigm suggests that Takotsubo syndrome is triggered by the overstimulation of the myocardium by catecholamines and is closely correlated to events involving severe emotional or physical stress. Cardiac dysfunction in critical illness is likely a phenotype of Takotsubo syndrome since patients in the ICU undergo extreme stress and are exposed to both endogenously-released and exogenously-administered catecholamines. In critical illness, accurate diagnosis of LV dysfunction is challenging due to the similar clinical presentation of potential aetiologies. However, diagnosing the underlying aetiology of LV dysfunction is essential to provide appropriate treatment and optimise outcomes. CAD can be diagnosed with coronary angiography and cardiac computed tomography (CCT). In the absence of CAD, cMRI is useful. cMRI can differentiate between myocardial ischemia, and inflammation, as well as between an acute or past event. In this study, patients are examined with echocardiography to identify those with cardiac dysfunction. In a sub-set of patients with LV dysfunction, patients will be examined with coronary CT (if no angiography performed) and cardiac MRI. Blood samples are collected for storage in biobank.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEchocardiography

All patients in the study will be examined with echocardiography

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Sub-group of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction will be examined with cMRI

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCoronary CT

Sub-group of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction will be examined with CCT

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged \> 18 years 2. Admitted to a participating ICU within 24 hours 3. Significant organ dysfunction involving at least two organ systems. This is defined as fulfilling both of the following: * At least 4 points on the SOFA scale (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scale) * Having at least 1 point on the SOFA scale from at least two organ systems 4. Given informed consent from patient or permission to participate from next of kin

Exclusion criteria

1. Echocardiographic examination not possible (e.g., pneumothorax, draping etc) or very low echocardiographic examination quality 2. Not being examined with echocardiography within 24 hours from inclusion 3. Retracted consent to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
90-days mortality90 daysDeath

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alive outside ICU90 daysDays alive while not in the ICU
Alive without mechanical ventilation90 daysDays alive and without mechanical ventilation
Alive without CRRT90 daysDays alive without CRRT

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactJonatan Oras, MD, PhD
jonatan.oras@vgregion.se+46313421000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026