Type 2 Diabetes
Conditions
Brief summary
To test whether a lifestyle program featuring one of two forms of intermittent fasting (IER or TRE) can feasibly and effectively improve glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, and potentially induce diabetes remission.
Detailed description
Intermittent energy restriction (IER) and time-restricted eating (TRE) are two distinct forms of intermittent fasting which have yet to be compared for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Investigators will test whether a comprehensive, intensive lifestyle program featuring each of these intermittent fasting approaches is feasible and effective for improving glycemic control in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the past 10 years. Both interventions will be delivered over one year in three phases: (1) a 12-week weight loss program featuring weekly group meetings, (2) a 12-week weight maintenance program featuring biweekly group meetings, and (3) a 6-month low-contact follow up period featuring monthly check-ins.
Interventions
During Phase 1 (Weight Loss), participants will follow a very-low energy diet (VLED; 550-800 kcal/d) 2-3 days per week. On other days, participants do not have a specific kcal goal (non-fasting days). After Phase 1, IER participants will be instructed to follow a VLED 1-2 days per week as needed for weight maintenance.
Participants will eat within an 8-hour period most days (at least 5 days per week). All foods and beverages containing calories will be restricted to this 8-hour period but calorie-free beverages (coffee, tea, diet soda, etc.) are allowed at any time. TRE participants will follow healthy eating guidelines for weight loss during Phase 1 but not follow a specific kcal prescription or restrict intake thereafter.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the past 10 years. 2. Age 21-65 years 3. BMI of 25 - 45 kg/m2 4. HbA1c of 6.7-9.5%, or those with A1c of \<6.7% on glucose-lowering medications 5. Ability to participate in a graduated physical activity program 6. Clearance from study physician.
Exclusion criteria
1. Inability to attend health education meetings. 2. Weight change of \>=5% in the previous 3 months. 3. Addition of new antihyperglycemic or weight-reducing medication in the previous 2 months. 4. Serious medical risk such as ongoing treatment for cancer, uncontrolled hypertension, recent cardiac event, or other medical condition presenting acute risk of participation in a lifestyle change program. 5. Untreated depression or anxiety, or increase in associated medications in the previous 3 months. 6. Current participation in another lifestyle change intervention, such as a tobacco cessation program or physical activity program. 7. Pregnancy or lactation within the previous six months 8. Weight of \>450 lbs 9. Currently taking medications that may result in hypoglycemia during fasting and unwilling to stop prior to the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Retention | 52 weeks | Feasibility of IER and TRE over one year assessed by retention (# completed / # enrolled) and attendance (# classes attended / # classes offered). |
| Adherence to diet protocols | Weekly from baseline to 52 weeks | Acceptability of IER and TRE over one year as assessed by compliance to program recommendations (# weeks adhered / # study weeks). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| HbA1c | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Estimate the effects for both IER and TRE on long-term glycemic control assessed via HbA1c |
| Oral Glucose Tolerance Test | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Estimate the effects for both IER and TRE on fasting and 3 hr glucose result. |
| Isulin resistance | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Estimate the effects for both IER and TRE on insulin resistance estimated by the oral minimal model during a mixed meal tolerance test |
| Insulin sensitivity | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Estimate the effects for both IER and TRE on insulin sensitivity estimated by the oral minimal model during a mixed meal tolerance test |
Countries
United States