Skip to content

Compassion-Focused Therapy for Distressing Mood Swings: A Case Series

An Investigation Into the Safety, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Brief Compassion-Focused Intervention for People Who Experience Distressing Mood Swings: A Case Series.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05860101
Enrollment
6
Registered
2023-05-16
Start date
2022-11-15
Completion date
2023-06-09
Last updated
2023-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Affective Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of this case series is to investigate whether a brief compassion-focused intervention is a safe, acceptable and feasible therapy for clients with bipolar affective disorder. The secondary questions are whether a brief compassion focused intervention for BPD clients is associated with changes in bipolar mood symptoms and/ or with changes in psychological processes linked to mood symptoms in bipolar, including: Self-compassion, perfectionism, social comparison and social safeness. Four visual analogue scales will also be completed daily by each participant throughout the project. These scales will measure domains relevant to BPAD symptomology and self-compassion. Participants will complete a 4 session Compassion-Focused Therapy Intervention. The first session will involve completion of the psychoeducation and formulation work which was started during the initial assessment session. Each intervention session will also involve the introduction and practice of CFT techniques or exercises. The trial therapist will introduce the exercise and practice it together with the participant during the session. Participants will then be asked to continue practicing the exercises for homework. Their experience of the practice and any difficulties can then be discussed at the start of the next session.

Interventions

Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) is based on the premise that we have three emotion regulation systems, the threat, drive and soothing systems. It has been suggested that our psychological wellbeing is dependent on maintaining a balance between these three systems, and if we lose this balance, e.g. the threat or drive systems become more dominant, then we start to experience emotional difficulties (Gilbert, 2009). In this study, participants are given various exercises to develop their soothing system, and help them to balance overactive threat.

Sponsors

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (18 years and older) * Diagnosis of Bipolar Affective Disorder

Exclusion criteria

* Client considered to be actively at acute risk - judgement made by responsible clinical team and also by risk assessment at our first assessment session. High risk clients are excluded as due to time constraints it will be difficult to address risk issues and complete the intervention in the short time frame we have outlined. * Client already receiving some form of CFT intervention, as this be a potential confounder. * Level of English not strong enough to complete assessment and intervention sessions without use of interpreter. Again, due to time constraints it would be difficult to complete the intervention with clients in the timeframe outline whilst using an interpreter or navigating the language barrier.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)(Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)Assessment/Baseline Only
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) (Larsen, Attkison, Hargreaves & Nguyen, 1979).Follow-up (2 weeks post-intervention)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The Short Revised Almost Perfect Scale (SAPS) (Rice, Richardson & Tueller, 2014)Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention)
internal states scale (ISS) (Bauer, 1991)Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention)
The Social Safeness and Pleasure Scale (Gilbert et al, 2009)Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention)
The Social Comparison Scale (Allan & Gilbert, 1995)Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention)
The Self Compassion Scale Short Form(SCS-SF) (Raes, Pommier, Neff & Van Gucht, 2011)Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention)

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026