Skip to content

Place of the Video-laryngoscope in Learning Intubation by Simulation

Place of the Video-laryngoscope in Learning Intubation by Simulation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05859542
Enrollment
35
Registered
2023-05-16
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2023-07-30
Last updated
2023-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngoscopy, Simulation

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the videolaryngoscope on reducing the time needed to intubate on a low-fidelity manikin for beginners. The investigators conducted a randomised crossover study, which took place in the simulation department of the medical school of Tunis. They used a low-fidelity manikin designed for learning airway management. The first part of our session consisted in a theoretical training. The second part was the practical training with procedural simulation.

Detailed description

Simulation is nowadays a widespread teaching method, particularly in airway management. The direct laryngoscope is the most commonly used device for learning intubation. As for the videolaryngoscope, it is mostly used on an advanced level, for teaching difficult laryngoscopy to professionals. Its impact on teaching intubation to beginners remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the videolaryngoscope on reducing the time needed to intubate on a low-fidelity manikin for beginners. The investigators conducted a randomised crossover study, which took place in the simulation department of the medical school of Tunis. They used a low-fidelity manikin designed for learning airway management. They included 35 trainees. The first part of our session consisted in a theoretical training, during which one single instructor exposed the anatomical basis and the material needed: a direct laryngoscope (Macintosh) with a number 3 curved blade, a videolaryngoscope (Med-Captain) with a number 3 curved blade and a number 7 tracheal tube with a stylet. The second part was the practical training with procedural simulation. The investigators randomized the trainees in two groups. Each trainee proceeded to three intubations with each device, in the specified order. The investigators used the SPSS software for data analysis. The investigators considered a p-value \< 0.05 as statistically significant.

Interventions

DEVICEVideolaryngoscope first

started the session with 3 intubations using the videolaryngoscope

DEVICEDirect laryngoscope first

started the session with 3 intubations using the Direct laryngoscope

Sponsors

Mongi Slim Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* fifth year's medical students. * consentment of the participants

Exclusion criteria

* participants who had previously performed a tracheal intubation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the time needed for the first intubation.up to 2 minutesTime en seconds needed for the tube to pass through the vocal cords.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the Cormack-Lehane gradeup to 2 minutesCormack and Lehane grades (1 to 4)
the satisfaction of the trainees.up to 24 hoursThe score of satisfaction

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026