Skip to content

Social Skills Training Group Effectiveness in Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Establishment of Social Skills Training Group in Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Effectiveness Analysis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05857813
Enrollment
120
Registered
2023-05-15
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2027-07-12
Last updated
2026-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief summary

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts, and the presence of restricted, repetitive behavior and interests, affecting 1 in 68 children. Although atypical social deficits onset in early childhood, their social relationships with peers may remain a challenge or even worsen for individuals with ASD throughout the school years and beyond, as social contexts increase in complexity and pose higher social expectations.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProgram for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS®)

developed at the University of California, Los Angeles (E. A. Laugeson \& F. Frankel, 2010). This is a parent-assisted, manualized social skills training program that addresses crucial areas of social functioning for adolescents. Psycho-education and cognitive-behavioral therapy techniques are employed to help adolescents develop ecologically valid skills for making and maintaining friendships.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged 11-20 years, currently enrolled in school between the sixth grade of elementary school and the third year of high school * with a clinical diagnosis of ASD from a licensed mental health or medical professional based on DSM-5 * experiencing social difficulties as reported by parents in a structured intake interview * scored ≧ 26 on the caregiver-reported Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), indicating clinical impairment associated with ASD * demonstrating verbal fluency in Chinese * with a full-scale IQ \> 70 on WAIS-IV * with motivation to participate in the intervention; * with a caregiver who was fluent in Chinese and willing to participate as a social coach in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* a history of major mental illness (e.g., bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, or psychosis) or neurological diseases that might hinder participation in the treatment * visual impairment and/or hearing impairment that would preclude participation in group-based social activities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)7 weeksInterview with caregiver of autistic participants. Total of 93 items coding from 1 to 9. Higher the score, worse the syptom
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)7 weeksObserve the autistic participant during the interview. the examinee's condition is classified as autism spectrum if the combined score across two domains of social interaction and communication is ≥7, and as autism if the combined score is ≥12. In Module 2, a combined score of ≥8 corresponds to autism spectrum, and a combined score of ≥12 corresponds to autism
Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)7 weeks50 statement scoring from 1 to 4. higher the score, worse the syptom
Friendship Quality Scale (FQS)7 weeks23 questions scoring from 1 to 5. Higher the score, better the quality of friendship
The Assessing Emotions Scale (AES)7 weeksscore range from 33 to 165. higher the score, better the emotional intelligence
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)7 weeks65 questions range from 1 to 4. higher the score, worse the symptom.
Social Adjustment Inventory for Children and Adolescents (SAICA)7 weeks17 scenarios scoring from 1 to 4. Higher the score, better the capability
Quality of Play Questionnaire (QPQ)7 weeks10 questions scoring from 0 to 3. Higher the score, worse the quality of play. Also, asked for frequency and number of participant in the play
Test of Adolescents Social Skills Knowledge (TASSK)7 weeksscore range from 0 to 22. Higher the score, greater the knowledge of taught social skills
Empathy Quotient (EQ)7 weeks60 questions score from 0 to 3. Higher the score, greater the empathy
Friendship Questionnaire (FQ)7 weeksscore from 0 to 135. higher the score, the more enjoyment of friendship

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTYi-Ling Chien
chienyiling@gmail.com+886223123456#66013

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 1, 2026