Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Trial of Rectal Indomethacin Versus Combined Pancreatic Stent Placement and Rectal Indomethacin for Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

A Prospective, Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Rectal Indomethacin Versus Combined Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement and Rectal Indomethacin for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05857514
Enrollment
384
Registered
2023-05-12
Start date
2023-05-10
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2023-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis. The main question it aims to answer is: whether rectal indomethacin alone is superior to combination of pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis Participants will be patients who give consent to the study and who are required to undergo ERCP as part of their standard care. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare \[rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis.\] to see if \[whether rectal indomethacin alone is superior to combination of pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis\].

Interventions

Prophylactic Rectal indomethacin 100mg for prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis

PROCEDUREProphylactic Pancreatic duct stenting

Prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting with rectal indomethacin 100 mg for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis

Sponsors

Moti Lal Nehru Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction 2. History of post ERCP Pancreatitis 3. Pancreatic instrumentation or sphincterotomy. 4. Precut sphincteroyomy 5. Difficult cannulation defined by more than 5 cannulation attempts 6. The use of double wire technique in bile duct access 7. At least 2 of the followings including 1. Female age \< 50 year 2. 3 pancreatogram 3. Acinarization (Contrast injection to tail of pancreas 4. Normal serum bilirubin 5. Guidewire to the tail of pancreas or secondary branches

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient planned for pancreatic stenting 2. Without informed consent 3. Age \< 18 years 4. Pregnant women 5. Lactating women 6. Patient with altered anatomy 7. Contraindications to the use of NSAIDS 8. Renal failure 9. Ongoing or recent hospitalisation for acute pancreatitis 10. Allergy to aspirin or NSAIDs 11. known chronic calcific pancreatitis -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare rectal indomethacin alone versus combined pancreatic duct stent and rectal indomethacin in prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis24 hourFor comparison between these two arms the investigators will measure serum amylase in U/L value after 6 hour and 24 hour of the ERCP procedure. The investigators will also assess for pain abdomen and vomiting suggestive of acute pancreatitis.

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactMukti Pr Meher, MBBS, MD
drmuktiprakash@gmail.com9556694521
Backup ContactSugata N Biswas, MBBS, MD DM
biswassugatan@gmail.com9007073201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026