Skip to content

Implementing a School-based Mindfulness Curriculum

Implementing a School-based Mindfulness Program in Primary School Curriculum

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05855564
Enrollment
800
Registered
2023-05-11
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2023-10-15
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Health Wellness 1

Keywords

student mental health, school-based mindfulness training, students with special needs

Brief summary

The outcomes and implementation processes of the school based mindfulness program, as a universal prevention program in classroom as and support group programs for students with special education needs will be investigated. The study of classroom program will apply quasi-experimental design, comparing the pretest and posttest of seven primary schools with implementation of mindfulness programs with three schools with ordinary school activities only. A total of 800 students will be recruited to receive an eight session mindfulness program in classroom as a universal prevention program. Ten support group for students with special education needs will apply mindfulness programs, and its outcome will be evaluated using repeated time measures.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALmindfulness matters

Classroom program will be provided to primary one students in eight primary schools and they will receive an 8 session mindfulness matters program, developed by Eline Snel, delivered by their teachers. Each session lasts for 30 minutes. The program includes mindfulness exercises, psychoeducation, discussion and sharing activities. For students with special needs, same programs will be delivered by teachers or social workers in small groups and each groups has 4 to 7 students. Program content is consistent with the classroom program.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* students in participating schools * students with parent's consent

Exclusion criteria

* student without parent's consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
positive self-perceptionimmediately before the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by Self-Evaluation Scale for Children. Values from 0 to 80. The higher the score, the stronger the positive self-perception

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
attitude towards schoolbefore the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by Assessment Programme for Affective and Social Outcomes (2nd Version). Values from 6 to 24. The higher the score, the stronger the positive attitude towards school.
organized, nondisruptive, and nonimpulsive behaviorsbefore the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by Self-Evaluation Scale for Children. Values from 0 to 70. The higher the score, the higher the severity of problem behaviors
executive functioningbefore the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by ratings of parent and teacher of Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, second edition. The scale includes subscales in inhibit, self-monitor, behavior regulation, emotion regulation, cognitive regulation. The higher the score, the stronger the functioning.
peer relationshipbefore the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by Assessment Programme for Affective and Social Outcomes (2nd Version). Values from 6 to 24. The higher the score, the better the peer relationship
self-regulationbefore the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by The Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders (HTKS) task
cortisolbefore the intervention, and immediately after the interventionmeasured by salivary cortisol (this measure is administered for students with special needs only)
creativitybefore the intervention, and immediately after the intervention.measured by the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production. The completed drawings are scored according to the following 10 criteria : (1) continuations, (2) completion, (3) new element, (4 ) connections made with a (5) connections made to produce a theme, (6) boundary breaking that is fragment dependent, (7) boundary breaking that is fragment independent, (8) perspective, (9) humour and affective, (10) unconventionality. The scores for all the criteria except unconventionality range d from 0 to 6. Each unconventionality criterion was score d either 0 or 3. The maximum score is 60. The higher the score, the higher the creativity.

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026