Skip to content

Plasma On Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration

Plasma On Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration - Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Plasma Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic, Non-healing Wounds in Comparison to Standard Wound Therapy -

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05855499
Acronym
POWER
Enrollment
120
Registered
2023-05-11
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ulcer of Lower Extremity

Brief summary

Every year, 5 million people throughout Germany suffer from extensive, often chronic wounds. Cold plasma is an innovative therapeutic approach in the treatment of these persistent tissue defects. However, previous therapy options with cold plasma are very time-consuming, especially with increasing wound area, and are also strongly dependent on the skill of the practitioner. This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds. The patient-related benefit of such an additional treatment will also be evaluated. Both study arms will receive guideline-based wound therapy, which is the current gold standard.

Detailed description

The clinical trial investigates the efficacy of an additional 4-week initial plasma therapy (CAPT) in direct comparison to standard guideline-based wound therapy (SWT) alone. The reactivation of healing of chronic, non-healing wounds will be assessed. This reactivation is primarily measured by the reduction of wound area, a valid and clinically accepted parameter for wound healing. A large number of RCTs and cohort studies demonstrate a strong correlation between the reduction in wound area at 4 weeks and the therapy outcome at 12 and 20 weeks. In addition to wound area reduction, other clinical parameters such as wound volume, wound closure, percentage of necrotic and fibrotic tissue, percentage of granulation tissue, wound exudate, and microflora are recorded. By recording these secondary endpoints, it is possible to closely track and analyse changes in wound condition induced by cold plasma. Another focus of the clinical trial is the evaluation of patient-related outcomes such as frequency of occurrence of infections, perception of pain, occurrence of adverse events, frequency of hospitalization, and change in quality of life. These events are fully documented to evaluate the safety of the treatment and to rule out potential risks.

Interventions

DEVICECPtcube, CPTpatch

This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds.

Sponsors

Coldplasmatech
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria are divided into patient-specific and wound-specific criteria. Patient Criteria: * Patient must be at least 18 years old (legal age) and legally competent * The patient has at least one diagnosed chronic (existing for at least 8 weeks), non-healing wound due to a UCA or UCV on the lower leg, below the knee * There is a signed consent form dated by the patient's own hand Wound Criteria: * In case of multiple wounds, the largest wound by area will be included in the study if it meets all inclusion criteria and no

Exclusion criteria

and is suitable for use of the investigational product. The target wound is at least 2 cm away from the other wound(s) * The wound was diagnosed - at the time of planned inclusion - more than 8 weeks ago and classified as a chronic wound * The initial wound area is 5 cm²-100 cm2 * The wound can be enclosed completely by the plasma applicator (10 cm x 10 cm) * The wound is not undermined * The wound is located on the lower leg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in area of chronic wounds3 visits weekly for 4 weeksChronic wound area is measured in square centimeters (cm²) using the SilhouetteStar® computer-assisted image-based wound measurement system. The outcome is the absolute change in wound area from baseline to Day 25, calculated as wound area at Day 25 minus wound area at baseline.
Change from baseline in SF-12 Mental Component Summary score at Day 253 visits weekly for 4 weeksMental health-related quality of life is measured using the Mental Component Summary score of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The outcome is the change in the SF-12 Mental Component Summary score from baseline to Day 25, expressed in points. The SF-12 scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 50 represents the population average and higher scores indicate a better health status.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound closuresduring the 4-week active treatment phase, after 3 and after 6 monthsNumber of participants with wound closure during the 4-week active treatment phase and at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments.
Change in wound painduring the 6-month observation periodChange in wound pain during activity or at rest during the 6-month observation period. Pain was assessed using an NRS with values ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Change in the amount of germs/bacteria in the wound bedduring the 4-week active treatment phaseFor this purpose, swabs are taken before and after treatment. The swabs are then examined in the laboratory with regard to the microflora (germ type and resistance). The bacterial load is measured on a logarithmic scale. Lower values indicate a lower bacterial load and therefore a better outcome.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORRobert Banaschik, Dr.

Coldplasmatech

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORIsabel Zänker, Dr.

Thüringen-Kliniken

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026