Stroke
Conditions
Brief summary
To determines the effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation versus Constrained Induced Movement Therapy for motor recovery and spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFunctional Electrical Stimulation
Functional Electrical Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTConstrained Induced Movement Therapy
Constrained Induced Movement Therapy for Motor Recovery and Spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients
Sponsors
Superior University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Clinically diagnosed chronic ischemic stroke patients. Patients from both genders Age 45 year and older. Patients having upper limb spasticity equal to 2 or less than 2 according to modified ash worth scale. Patients having active cognitive scoring on Mini Mental State Examination.
Exclusion criteria
Having pacemaker and other stimulation devices. Prosthesis of bones, joints in targeted region of treatment. Patients presenting the history of recurrent stroke. Patients having history of bilateral hemiparesis. Co-morbid history of tumor, heart disease, hypertensive. Patients presenting with skin lesions, wounds, discoloration will be excluded from this research.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Motor Function assessment test | 6 Months |
| Scale Modified Ash worth | 6 Months |
Countries
Pakistan
Contacts
Primary ContactSalwa Jamil, DPT
Outcome results
None listed