Skip to content

Liquid Biopsy Based NGS in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC

iNUDGE: INtegration of liqUiD Biopsy Based Next Generation Gene sEquencing in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC - A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05853887
Acronym
iNUDGE
Enrollment
260
Registered
2023-05-11
Start date
2023-06-15
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newly Diagnosed NSCLC, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic, Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Neoplasm of Lung

Keywords

Next Generation Sequencing, Liquid biopsy, Newly diagnosed, Molecular testing, Plasma based next generation sequencing, Electronic health record, Nudge intervention, Targeted therapy, Behavioral economics

Brief summary

This study expands the application of an electronic health record (EHR) "nudge" used to prompt physicians' clinical practice to order molecular testing at the time of initial diagnosis for patients with specific types of advanced lung cancer. The primary goal is to have these test results available prior to starting treatment so that physicians can make molecularly-informed treatment decisions. The second goal is to better understand factors that contribute to whether or not the EHR-nudge implementation is successful.

Detailed description

At the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), a behavioral economics (BE) informed "nudge" strategy was piloted to guide physicians' clinical practice to include concurrent use of plasma and tissue-based next generation sequencing (NGS) testing at the time of initial diagnosis for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These findings have demonstrated that behavioral, electronic health record (EHR)-based nudges are feasible and can promote guideline concordant diagnostic testing at both community and academic sites. The overarching goal of this current trial is to expand the application of the BE informed nudges, which includes a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) and Electronic Decision Support Tool (e-CDS) approach, which has been operationalized within Epic, the EHR used at UPHS, to six satellite hospitals. Our central hypothesis is that this approach will dramatically increase adoption of comprehensive molecular testing and enhance the delivery of molecularly informed 1L therapy in patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC. Intervention: A multicomponent BE-informed EHR-based nudge designed to facilitate comprehensive molecular testing by embedding a default P-NGS order into the EHR at the time of the NPV. If ordered, test results are incorporated into provider workflows and conveyed through electronic clinical decision support (e-CDS) notifications. This support program will notify clinicians of targetable mutations, potential clinical trials, as well as absence of mutations detected on plasma testing as a means of improving the timely delivery of molecularly informed therapy. Study Design Objective 1: In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of newly diagnosed patients with mNSq NSCLC, evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent BE-informed EHR-based nudge intervention at increasing timely receipt of comprehensive molecular test results prior to 1L therapy by incorporating P-NGS into the standard clinical workup. The design of this trial will include 3 clusters, representing 6 community hospitals. There will be an initial period in which no clusters are exposed to the intervention. Subsequently, at regular intervals (the "steps") one cluster (or a group of clusters) will be randomized to cross from the control to the intervention under evaluation. This process will continue until all clusters have crossed over to be exposed to the intervention. At the end of the study there will be a period when all clusters are exposed. Data collection will continue throughout the study, so that each cluster will contribute observations under both control and intervention observation periods. Two years of baseline data will be obtained from all study sites for comparison. Objective 2: Assess the contextual mechanisms influencing the adoption, reach, and effectiveness of EHR-based nudge interventions, with a lens for health equity in molecular testing using mixed-methods. Using rigorous approaches proven successful in our prior work, we will recruit patient and clinician participants from each site to complete semi-structured interviews and structured questionnaires. The goal of this objective is to understand contextual mechanisms (e.g., patient, clinician, clinic, structural factors) shaping adoption, reach, and effectiveness of each intervention and identify how response may differ by key characteristics. These data will be analyzed using convergent mixed methods analysis, which employs the simultaneous collection and analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data to gain a comprehensive understanding of the multi-level factors shaping trial outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALiNUDGE

Electronic health record nudge which prompts physicians to order plasma-based NGS testing for eligible patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

Sponsors

Charu Aggarwal
Lead SponsorOTHER
Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This intervention is directed towards physicians. Individuals will not be randomized.

Intervention model description

This study employs a stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial design. Randomization will occur at the group (site) level. Sites will be turned on according to the stepped-wedge cluster randomized design but will run in parallel.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with a histological, or cytological diagnosis of metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not yet received systemic treatment for metastatic disease. * Participants must be seen at Lancaster General Health (LGH), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (PPMC), Penn Medicine Cherry Hill (PMCH), Penn Medicine Princeton Health (PMPH), Penn Medicine Voorhees (PMV) or Penn Medicine Washington Township (PMWT) for mNSq NSCLC.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with incomplete staging information. * Children, pregnant women, fetuses, neonates, or prisoners are not included in this research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Availability of comprehensive molecular test results prior to first line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLCMeasured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosisWere comprehensive molecular test results available prior to initiation of 1L therapy? (Yes/No)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful EHR based nudge deliveryMeasured up to 6 weeks from randomizationAmongst eligible patients, calculate the proportion of patients for whom the EHR nudge fired successfully (Yes/No). Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
Turnaround time of delivery of provider focused alertsMeasured up to 6 weeks from randomizationReported as number of days, median. Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
Completion of comprehensive molecular testing & modality usedMeasured up to 3 months from initial diagnosisRelative and absolute change in completion of comprehensive testing by tissue and plasma, plasma alone, or tissue alone will be tabulated.
Reasons for failure to complete comprehensive molecular testing:Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosisSummarize reasons for failure of completion of testing i. Tissue related (QNS) ii. Patient related factors (unable to biopsy, patient declined biopsy etc.) iii. Assay related factors (plasma assay does not detect mutations) iv. Other
Time to molecularly informed treatment initiationMeasured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosisi. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of diagnosis of Stage IV disease (date of biopsy) ii. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of first new patient visit with medical oncology
Type of therapy receivedMeasured up to 3 months from initial diagnosisi. Targeted therapy ii. Chemo-immunotherapy iii. Immunotherapy iv. Clinical trial or n v. None
Overall survivalMeasured up to 1 year from the time of randomization to death from any causei. Time from initial diagnosis to date of death or last follow up. ii. 1 year and 2-year overall survival rates will be calculated for the intervention group, and compared to baseline.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCharu Aggarwal, MD, MPH

Penn Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026