Skip to content

Nurse-Led Quality of Life Study-Phase I

A Nurse-Led Intervention to Enhance Quality of Life Among Early Phase Clinical Trial Participants: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05853614
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-05-11
Start date
2023-04-15
Completion date
2025-04-15
Last updated
2025-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life

Keywords

Quality of Life

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to pilot test a brief, population-specific nurse-led, quality of life (QOL) intervention with early phase cancer clinical trial (EP-CT) participants. The name of the intervention used in this research study is: -Nurse-Led Quality of Life Intervention (comprised of nurse-patient relationship, assessment and monitoring of participant QOL, and interdisciplinary team meetings led by the CRN (clinical research nurse).

Detailed description

This is a single-site study evaluating the feasibility and acceptability as well as patient-reported and clinical outcomes of a nurse-led, quality of life intervention with EP-CT participants. The research study procedures include obtaining consent to participate, meeting with research nurses monthly for three months, completing questionnaires, and an interview with the study staff at the end of the study. Participation in this research study is expected to be for a total of six months. It is expected that about 35 people, 25 caregivers, and 10 clinicians will take part in this research study. The Oncology Nursing Foundation is supporting this research study by providing funding.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALQuality of Life Intervention

Comprised of three components: (1) establishment of clinical research nurse (CRN) and patient relationship, (2) assessment and monitoring of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being and patient-reported outcomes, and (3) weekly, interdisciplinary team meetings led by CRN.

Sponsors

Oncology Nursing Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria: -\> 18 years of age. * Adults with cancer enrolled on an EP-CT in the Termeer Center at Massachusetts General Hospital. * Able to read and respond to questions in English. Caregiver Inclusion Criteria: * A relative or friend of the eligible patient whom the patient identifies as being involved in their medical care. -\> 18 years of age. * Verbally fluent in English. Clinician Inclusion Criteria: * Clinician must be an oncology nurse. * CRN for a minimum of 18 months. * fulltime employee in the Termeer Center.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Participant EnrollmentAt screeningThe study will be feasible if at least 60% (95% confidence interval of +/-12%) enrollment of approached and eligible patients agree to participate in the study and sign informed consent
Rate of Participant Assessment CompletionBaseline to 3 monthsThis study will be feasible if at least 70% (95% confidence interval of +/- 15%) of enrolled participants will complete a minimum of 60% of their patient-reported symptom assessments within the study period.
Intervention AcceptabilityBaseline to 3 monthsAcceptability is defined as \> 70% of patients, caregivers, and clinicians report favorable responses to the acceptability questions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Symptom ManagementBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by PROMIS - Self Efficacy for Managing Symptoms, a 4-item set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical health.
Change in HopeBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by the Herth Hope Index (HHI), which measures various dimensions of hope using a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with items #3 and #6 reverse-coded.
Change in CopingBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Brief Cope, a 28 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure effective and ineffective ways to cope with a stressful life event.
Change in Social IsolationBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by PROMIS - Social Isolation, a 4-item set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors social wellbeing.
Change in AnxietyBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a brief self-report validated questionnaire that consists of a 2-item depression scale (PHQ-2) and a 2-item anxiety scale (GAD-2).
Change in DepressionBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a brief self-report validated questionnaire that consists of a 2-item depression scale (PHQ-2) and a 2-item anxiety scale (GAD-2).
Change in Prognostic AwarenessBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Prognostic Awareness Impact Scale (PAIS), a 34-item instrument measuring prognostic awareness and its psychological and behavioral impact.
Change in Financial Well-BeingBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), an 11-item instrument measures financial toxicity.
Change in Perception of the Nurse-Patient RelationshipAt 3 monthsAssessed by the RELATE scale, a 17-item instrument that measures patient perceptions of the nurse-patient relationship.
SurvivalThrough study completion, an average of two yearsCalculated by log rank test, cox proportional hazard modeling, and Kaplan Meyer plots.
Number of Days on TrialThrough study completion, an average of two yearsCalculated by log rank test, cox proportional hazard modeling, and Kaplan Meyer plots.
Percentage of Participants Completing Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Period1 year
Number of Emergency Department VisitsThrough study completion, an average of two years
Utilization of Supportive Care ServicesThrough study completion, an average of two yearsCalculated by log rank test, cox proportional hazard modeling, and Kaplan Meyer plots.
Percentage of Hospice UtilizationThrough study completion, an average of two years
Change in Spiritual WellbeingBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT - Sp), a 12-item questionnaire that measures spiritual well-being in cancer and other chronic illnesses.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL)Baseline to 3 monthsAssessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), a questionnaire comprised of 27 items with scale ratings validated to measure physical, emotional, social, and functional well-being of clinical trial participants.
Change in Symptom BurdenBaseline to 3 monthsAssessed through the Edmonton Symptom Assessment- revised scale (ESAS-R), a 10-item measure to assess symptoms. The ESAS-R score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026