Skip to content

Comparative Study Between Shear and Strain Elastography in Monitoring the Response to NAC in Breast Cancer Patients

Comparative Study Between Shear and Strain Elastography in Monitoring the Response to NAC in Breast Cancer Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05852743
Enrollment
65
Registered
2023-05-10
Start date
2023-08-31
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Monitoring the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using SE and SWE

Brief summary

The aim is to evaluate tumor stiffness changes through a comparative study between shear and strain elastography in monitoring the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Detailed description

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in global population, with the highest morbidity and mortality rates among female.(1) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become an important supplement of comprehensive and precise treatment of BC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used to induce tumor shrinkage, thereby allowing smaller surgical resection, eliminating clinically silent micro metastases, and providing prognostic information based on the extent of pathologic response(.2-4) Pathological complete response (pCR) is increasingly seen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for invasive breast cancer. Confident identification of pCR may lead to less radical breast surgery and to sentinel node biopsy rather than axillary clearance in women with pre-treatment positive nodes.(5)Response to NACT is routinely assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), greyscale ultrasound (US), and mammography.(6) In some studies, MRI has been shown to be superior to US.(7-8) however, MRI has the disadvantages of being time-consuming, expensive, requiring intravenous contrast agent . Ultrasonic elastography (UE) has been widely used to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate differences in lesion stiffness or elasticity. Currently, the two most frequently used UE techniques for examination of breast diseases are strain elastography (SE) and shear-wave elastography (SWE). In practice, UE is a complementary technique for differentiating benign from malignant breast masses (9,10). Breast cancers with more aggressive pathological properties tend to have higher stiffness values .Strain elastography (SE) may be predictive of response in the early stage of treatment with high sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE).(11,12) Pretreatment tumor stiffness measured by shear wave elastography (SWE) has a significant relationship with the subsequent reduction in tumor cellularity.(13) In case of NACT, early evaluation of relative changes in tumor stiffness could effectively predict the response and might indicate better therapeutic strategies.(14)

Interventions

DEVICEshear wave and strain elastography

shear wave elastography is a quantitative technique , while strain elastography is qualitative technique

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma . 2. Age equal or above 18

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous radiation therapy or chemotherapy 2. Mass not detected by US 3. Non Mass lesion by MRI 4. Ductal carcinoma in situ

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparative study between shear and strain elastography in monitoring the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapybaselineevaluate tumor stiffness changes through a comparative study between shear and strain elastography in monitoring the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Contacts

Primary ContactSilvia Gamal Rasmy
dsilviajesus@gmail.com01289374337
Backup ContactLamiaa Mohamed Refaat
lamiaa_refaat@yahoo.com01003386186

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026