Skip to content

The Effecttiveness of Intratympanic Methylprednisolon Injections Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Vertigo Attacks in Meniere's Disease

A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Intratympanic Injections methylPREDnisolon Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Vertigo Attacks in MENière's Disease (PREDMEN Trial).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05851508
Acronym
PREDMEN
Enrollment
148
Registered
2023-05-09
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2023-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meniere Disease

Keywords

Meniere's disease, Methylprednisolon, Intratimpanic corticosteroids, Dizziness, Hearing loss, tinnitus, aural fullness, randomized control trial

Brief summary

Ménière's disease is an inner ear disorder in which patients suffer from attacks of vertigo, tinnitus and hearing loss. To date, it is unclear what the best treatment for this condition is. Giving injections in the inner ear with the adrenal cortical hormone methylprednisolone is a treatment that is already widely used, but still there is insufficient evidence in the effectiveness of this treatment. This multicenter trial compares a patient group which receives injections of methylprednisolone to a patient group which receives placebo injections. Subsequently, dizziness, tinnitus, hearing loss and quality of life will be assed and compared for the above mentioned groups, over a period of one year.

Detailed description

Meniere's disease is an inner ear disease characterized by recurrent episodes of vertigo, hearing loss, tinnitus and aural fullness. It is estimated that 15000 patients in de Netherlands suffer from this disease. Endolymfactic hydrops is thought to be the underlying pathophysiology of the symptoms. Salt restriction, oral medication (diuretics and betahistine), intratympanic gentamicin and steroids, ablative surgery, and endolymphatic sac surgery are some of the current therapy options. A probable effectiveness of the treatment with intratympanic gentamicin is found but this treatment is ototoxic and carries a risk of hearing loss. Methylprednisolone injections have been shown to be safer, however there is insufficient data to support the efficacy of this treatment. Therefore in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, effectiveness of intratympanic injections with methylPREDnisolon versus placebo in the treatment of vertigo attacks in MENière's disease is compared. The investigators aim to include 74 patients in each arm, based on a statistical power of 80 percent. Patients will be randomly randomized to one of the two treatment arms, receiving either a placebo injection or a methylprednisolone sodium succinate injection at a dose of 62.5 mg/ml. After 14 days, this injection will be given once more. A follow-up visit will be scheduled after six and twelve months and telephone follow-up calls will be scheduled after three and nine months. The primary objective will be the control of vertigo, with secondary outcomes including hearing loss, tinnitus, the frequency of escape interventions, quality of life, adverse events and cost effectiveness.

Interventions

Intratympanal injection with Methylprednisolon 62.5 mg/ ml

DRUGPlacebo

Intratympanal injection with saline, natriumchloride 0.9%

Sponsors

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
Gelre Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
Maasstad Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Medisch Spectrum Twente
CollaboratorOTHER
HagaZiekenhuis
CollaboratorOTHER
Leiden University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Trial subjects, treating physicians and outcome assessors will be blinded throughout the entire study. Pharmacy staff will be unblinded for randomization and treatment allocation. Emergency unblinding may occur in the following situations: in case of a medical emergency where knowledge of the blinded treatment is necessary, for the treatment of (serious) adverse event, in the event of a SUSAR (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction) needing expedited reporting or if requested by the Safety Committee.

Intervention model description

A multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• Unilateral, definite MD according to the diagnostic criteria derived from the American Academy Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Classification Committee of the Bárány Society, European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and International Classification of Vestibular Disorders published in 2015 \[7\] (see Appendix 1): Definite MD Two or more spontaneous episodes of vertigo, each lasting 20 minutes to 12 hours, AND Audiometrically documented low- to medium-frequency sensorineural hearing loss in one ear, defining the affected ear on at least one occasion before, during or after one of the episodes of vertigo, AND Fluctuating aural symptoms (hearing, tinnitus, or fullness) in affected ear (not better accounted for by another vestibular diagnosis) * age \> 18 years at the start of the trial. * ≥ 4 vertigo attacks over the last 6 months. * willing to adhere to daily trial medications and the follow-up assessments.

Exclusion criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded: * bilateral MD * severe disability (e.g. neurological, orthopaedic, cardiovascular) or serious concurrent illness that might interfere with treatment or follow-up. * active additional neuro-otologic disorders that may mimic MD (e.g. vestibular migraine, recurrent vestibulopathy, phobic postural vertigo, vertebro-basilar TIAs, acoustic neuroma). * otitis media with effusion based on tympanogram results. * history of intratympanic injections with corticosteroid less than 6 months ago. * history of intratympanic injections with gentamicin or ear surgery for treating MD. * pregnant women and nursing women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vertigo spellsDaily, change from baseline to one yearA definitive vertigo spell is defined as a spontaneous rotational vertigo symptom, which lasts at least 20 minutes and is often accompanied by disequilibrium and vomiting. No loss of consciousness is present. Vertigo spells are measured daily with the dizzy quest ap. Futhermore, at baseline after 6 and 12 months, caloric testing and a video-head impusle test are performend. Additionally the dizziness handicap inventory will be taken.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TinnitusAt baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsTinnitus will be measured with the tinnitus handicap inventory at baseline, after 6 and 12 months.
health-related quality of lifeAt baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe health realted quality of life will be evaluated with the generic quality of life questionnaire: EQ-5D
Escape medicationAt baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsThe frequency of use of metoclopramide in the acute phase of vertigo will be registered.
Adverse eventsDaily, change from baseline to one yearAt each study visit, subjects will be questioned about adverse events they have experienced since the last study visit.
Hearing lossAt baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsHearing loss will be measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months after injection. Pure tone audimetry and extended fletcher index including the speech discrimination score will be tested.
Co-interventionsDaily, change from baseline to one yearThe use of additional methylprednisolon or gentamicine will be evaluated during the entire study.
Overall functionAt baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe functional level scale will be measured with the questionnaire: Functional level scale: a scale from 1-6 in which 1 means: my dizziness has no effect on my activities and 6 means: I have been disabled for one year or longer and/or I received compensation (money) because of y dizziness or balance problem.
Impact of DizzinessChange from baseline to 6 months to 12 monthsThe impact of dizziness will be measured with the questionnaire: Dizziness handicap inventory
Tinnitus severityAt baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe tinnitus severety will be measured with the questionnaire: Tinnitus functional index
Cost-effectivenessAt baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsCosts per QALY, this will be calculated from above mentioned outcomes on quality of life.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactMaud Boreel, MD
m.m.e.boreel@lumc.nl+3171 526 9111
Backup ContactBabette van Esch, MD, PHD
b.f.van_esch@lumc.nl+3171 526 9111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026