Skip to content

Prehabilitation in Geriatric Patients With Colorectal Neoplasia

Results of a Programme of Intensive Prehabilitation in GEriatric Patients Operated for Colo-Rectal Neoplasia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05851235
Acronym
PIGEON
Enrollment
25
Registered
2023-05-09
Start date
2023-03-22
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2023-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colo-rectal Cancer

Keywords

Prehabilitation

Brief summary

This an interventional, non-pharmacologic study. Prehabilitation is a multidisciplinary preoperative intervention aimed at preventing or reducing functional decline related to surgery and improving perioperative outcomes. The current study is aimed at standardizing a prehabilitation pathway, evaluating its feasibility within the AUSL Romagna in collaboration with the PRIME Centre and the multiple professions that populate the two institutes in the spirit of confirming the beneficial effect of an integrated prehabilitation programme on surgical outcomes. Patients will follow an intensive prehabilitation course before surgery: * Colon cancer patients will do 4 weeks of prehabilitation before surgery. * Rectal cancer patients will do 12 weeks of prehabilitation after neoadjuvant therapy and before surgery. The prehabilitation course is structured around the following aspects: * Frailty assessment and identification of optimisation fields * Optimisation of modifiable factors (anaemia, polypharmacotherapy, smoking, alcoholism, diabetes) * Assessment by an integrative medicine specialist * Nutritional pre-qualification * Cardiovascular, respiratory, motor prehabilitation * Emotional and psychological prehabilitation

Interventions

OTHERPrehabilitation course

During prehabilitation course, patients will follow a nutritional programme, a cardiovascular and motor programme and a psychological programme.

Sponsors

Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo (IOR)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori IRST S.r.l. IRCCS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The participant (or legally acceptable representative if applicable) provides written informed consent for the trial. 2. Male/female participants who are at least 70 years of age on the day of signing informed consent. 3. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of colorectal cancer awaiting major surgery.

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinical need for emergency intervention. 2. Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE\<20\*) 3. Severe dependency (ADL\<3) 4. Stage IV colorectal neoplasia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of eligible participants completed the personalized proposed prehabilitation program4 monthsThe primary endpoint of the study will be the feasibility of delivering a prehabilitation program, based on adherence. This study will be deemed as feasible if ≥80% of eligible participants completed the personalized proposed prehabilitation program.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30-days mortality30 days after the surgeryProportion of patients who died for all causes within 30 days after the surgery
Overall morbidity rate and major morbidity rate4 monthsCalculated according Clavien-Dindo classification
Adherence to prescription4 monthsPercentage of patients with compliance greater than 80% to prehabilitation prescription
Preservation/improvement of pre-operative quality of life before vs. 1-month after surgery.30 days after the surgeryQuestionnaire EORTC QLQ-ELD14, a questionnaire that comprise five scales (mobility, worries about others, future worries, maintaining purpose and burden of illness) and two single items (joint stiffness and family support). Four levels were available for the response (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Distribution of EORTC QLQ-ELD14 items at different times were calculated. All scale and item scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, higher scores representing a worse outcome except for maintaining purpose and family support. EORTC QLQ-ELD14 scores were expressed as mean (Standard Deviation-SD) and median (minimum-maximum), while frequency will be calculated for categorical variables (for the five scales and two single items).
Postoperative functional recovery at one month after surgery30 days after the surgeryPercentage of patients experiences functional recovery as described in protocol.
Preservation/improvement of pre-operative quality of life before vs. 1-month after surgery30 days after the surgeryQuestionnaire EQ-5D-3L. Test results are presented in the form of an index and a VAS scale. The index is based on patients' quality of life in 5 domains across 3 levels. Distribution of EQ-5D-3L dimension responses at different times were calculated. The index, which is a value attached to an EQ-5D-3L profile according to a set of weights that reflect, on average, people's preferences about how good or bad the state is, ranges from 0 (poorest quality of life) to 1 (perfect health). The value set generated from the European population (EQ) was used as the reference cohort for index calculation. The VAS score is generated by asking the patient how he/she ranked his/her QoL, as compared to his/her peers, on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher values were associated to a better quality of life. EQ-5D-3L index and VAS were expressed as mean (Standard Deviation-SD) and median (minimum-maximum), while frequency will be calculated for categorical variables (five domains of EQ-5D-3L).

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactIsacco Montroni, MD
isacco.montroni@auslromagna.it0544 285111
Backup ContactCentro di Coordinamento
cc.ubsc@irst.emr.it0544 287173

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026