Skip to content

Intravascular Injection Rate During Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Block Using Bent or Straight Needles

The Difference of Intravascular Injection Rate During Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Block Using Bent Needle Compared to Straight Needle: a Prospective Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05849324
Enrollment
260
Registered
2023-05-08
Start date
2023-04-27
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia, Epidural

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study was to compare intravascular injection rates during LTFESI between commonly used straight and bent chiba needles.

Detailed description

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection (LTFESI) is widely used in clinical practice to effectively deliver injectate into the ventral epidural space. Complications associated with intravascular injection such as spinal cord infarction and paraplegia can occur during LTFESI. The incidence of intravascular injection during LTFESI was known as 9.9% \ 17.7%. To improve the safety of the procedure, avoidance of intravascular injection is crucial, for which appropriate needle selection is important. Currently, the most commonly used block needles in LTFESI are straight or bent chiba needles. The primary aim of this study was to compare intravascular injection rates during LTFESI between commonly used straight and bent chiba needles.

Interventions

DEVICEStraight needle

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection is a useful option in the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar radicular pain. During lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection, straight needle is going to be used.

DEVICEBent needle

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection is a useful option in the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar radicular pain. During lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection, bent needle is going to be used.

Sponsors

Kyungpook National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with radiating pain from lumbar spinal stenosis and herniated nucleus pulposus.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, allergic to contrast media, patient refusal, and patients with persistent contraindication to nerve block such as coagulopathy and infection of the injection site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intravascular injectionDuring procedureIntravascular injection is defined as contrast media spreading out through the vascular channel during injection of contrast media under real time fluoroscopy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventral epidural spreadingup to 24 weeksVentral epidural spreading is defined when the contrast reached just behind the vertebral body in fluoroscopic lateral view.
Medial epidural spreadingup to 24 weeksMedial epidural spreading is defined as contrast filling the inner side of the pedicle medial margin
Procedure timeDuring procedureProcedure time is defined as the time from the point when the block needle passed through the skin to observation of the complete contrast flow pattern with real time fluoroscopy.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJimin Heo
knuhmrc@knu.ac.kr+82-53-420-5430
Backup ContactSaeyoung Kim
saeyoungkim7@gmail.com+82-53-420-5873

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026