Skip to content

Prospective Case Series to Refine Standalone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Components for Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue

Prospective Case Series to Refine Standalone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Components for Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05848323
Enrollment
21
Registered
2023-05-08
Start date
2023-10-30
Completion date
2024-09-25
Last updated
2025-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatigue, Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis, Fatigue, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Relaxation training, Behavioral activation, Cognitive therapy

Brief summary

This prospective case series will use mixed methods to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of three telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy components (relaxation training, behavioral activation, cognitive therapy) for fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis.

Detailed description

Fatigue affects 80% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), and nearly half report fatigue as their most disabling symptom. The cognitive behavioral model of MS fatigue theorizes that MS disease factors trigger fatigue, but fatigue is maintained or worsened by factors like daily stress and how PwMS react cognitively, behaviorally, physiologically, and emotionally to fatigue. In-person and telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for fatigue targets these factors and reactions and is one of the most effective treatments for MS fatigue. However, CBT is resource intensive, as it consists of multiple components (i.e., relaxation training, behavioral activation, cognitive therapy), requiring 8-16 hour-long sessions delivered by a specialized clinician. CBT has yet to be assessed via an integrated translational model that considers all stages, from intervention development to implementation. Thus, the active components of CBT for MS fatigue and their mechanisms are unclear and, despite the significant burden of MS fatigue, CBT for fatigue is not widely accessible due to various implementation barriers. The proposed prospective case series is the first of two project aims. The overall project aims to optimize CBT for fatigue to maximize efficacy and efficiency. It will use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to advance scientific evidence on CBT's active components and facilitate implementation, thereby improving accessibility. The proposed prospective case series (Aim 1) will: 1. examine the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth CBT components (relaxation training, behavioral activation, cognitive therapy) for fatigue in PwMS. 2. examine initial effects of telehealth CBT components (relaxation training, behavioral activation, cognitive therapy) for improving fatigue in PwMS. 3. understand participants' perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and perceived effectiveness of telehealth CBT components (relaxation training, behavioral activation, cognitive therapy) for improving fatigue in PwMS and their recommendations for improving the CBT components.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL4-week Relaxation Training

A 4-session telehealth Relaxation Training intervention for multiple sclerosis fatigue that is derived from evidence-based multicomponent CBT for multiple sclerosis fatigue. The intervention is based on the cognitive behavioral model of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. The intervention involves 4, 30-60-minute sessions including the following content a) education about fatigue in multiple sclerosis and the cognitive behavioral model of multiple sclerosis fatigue, b) treatment rationale, b) didactic and experiential training in relaxation techniques such as diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, autogenic relaxation, and guided imagery, and c) goal setting and problem-solving barriers focused on integrating relaxation practices into daily routine.

BEHAVIORAL4-week Behavioral Activation

A 4-session telehealth Behavioral Activation intervention for multiple sclerosis fatigue that is derived from evidence-based multicomponent CBT for multiple sclerosis fatigue. The intervention is based on the cognitive behavioral model of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. The intervention involves 4, 30-60-minute sessions including the following content a) education about fatigue in multiple sclerosis, the cognitive behavioral model of multiple sclerosis fatigue, and self-monitoring activity and energy, b) treatment rationale, c) identification of values/priorities to guide activities, d) activity planning, e) goal setting and problem-solving barriers to engaging in activities.

BEHAVIORAL4-week Cognitive Therapy

A 4-session telehealth Cognitive Therapy intervention for multiple sclerosis fatigue that is derived from evidence-based multicomponent CBT for multiple sclerosis fatigue. The intervention is based on the cognitive behavioral model of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. The intervention involves 4, 30-60-minute sessions including the following content a) education about fatigue in multiple sclerosis, the cognitive behavioral model of multiple sclerosis fatigue, self-monitoring thoughts, and core beliefs, b) treatment rationale, b) labeling thoughts as helpful, unhelpful, or neutral, c) using distraction to cope with unhelpful thoughts, d) challenging and changing unhelpful thoughts, e) problem solving barriers to coping with or changing unhelpful thoughts.

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. MS diagnosis of any subtype per chart review 2. Score 4 or higher on the Fatigue Severity Scale 3. Presence of chronic, problematic fatigue that, in the opinion of the patient, has interfered with their daily activities for 3 or more months 4. Are able to comply with study procedures and complete measures independently assessed via self-report 5. All genders 6. 18 years of age or older 7. Able to read and speak English 8. Are willing to maintain current fatigue treatment regimen for duration of study (although individuals who want to make a change to their fatigue treatment regimen will be considered eligible 3 months after making that change)

Exclusion criteria

1. Score greater than 7 on the Patient Determined Disease Steps Scale 2. Has significant cognitive impairment as indicated by 1 or more errors on the 6-item Cognitive Screener 3. Change in disease modifying medications in the prior three months assessed via self-report (although participants will be considered eligible after the 3-month window) 4. History of MS relapse within the last 30 days prior to screening assessed via self-report (although participants will be considered eligible after the 30-day window) 5. Current suicidal ideation with intent or plan as indicated by a score of 1 or higher on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 suicide item and further assessment with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (although individuals with suicidal ideation but no intent or plan will be considered eligible) 6. Currently engaged in psychotherapy for fatigue assessed via self-report 7. Current pregnancy (although participants will be considered eligible when they are no longer pregnant) 8. Currently participating in another research study that could impact fatigue such as intervention studies targeting mood, energy management, exercise/physical activity, and diet (although participants can be screened for eligibility once they have completed the other research study).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention AcceptabilityCollected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Intervention Acceptability will be measured with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). When assessed via online survey, responses from the Intervention Acceptability items are averaged to create a mean score \[1-5\]. A higher score indicates more agreement with intervention acceptability while a lower score indicates less agreement with intervention acceptability.
Intervention AppropriatenessCollected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Intervention Appropriateness will be measured with the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). When assessed via online survey, responses from the Intervention Appropriateness items are averaged to create a mean score \[1-5\]. A higher score indicates more agreement with intervention appropriateness while a lower score indicates less agreement with intervention appropriateness.
Intervention FeasibilityCollected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Intervention Feasibility will be measured with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). When assessed via online survey, responses from the Intervention Feasibility items are averaged to create a mean score \[1-5\]. A higher score indicates more agreement with intervention feasibility while a lower score indicates less agreement with intervention feasibility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue CatastrophizingCollected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Fatigue catastrophizing will be measured by the Fatigue Catastrophizing Scale. This is a 13-item self-report questionnaire assessing negative beliefs or expectations connected to one's perceptions of fatigue via a 5-point Likert-type scale. Summed total scores range from 0 to 52, and a higher score indicates greater fatigue catastrophizing.
Behavioral ActivationCollected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Behavioral activation will be measured by the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale Short Form. This is a 9-item self-report measure. It assess the extent to which the respondent thinks they have engaged in pleasant and/or goal-directed activity over the past week via a 7-point Likert-type scale. Summed total scores range from 0 to 54, and a higher score indicates greater behavioral activation.
FatigueCollected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Fatigue will be measured by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. This is a 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing fatigue-related symptoms in the previous four weeks via 5-point Likert-type scale. It yields a total score (range: 0-84) and a higher score indicates greater fatigue.
Global Impression of ChangeCollected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).This is a single-item self-report scale that assess the perceived intervention-related change in one's activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life via 7-point Likert-type scale. The score ranges from 0 to 6 and a higher score indicates greater perceived change.
Cognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormCollected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).This is a 18-item self-report questionnaire consisting of five subscales assessing cognitive responses (fear avoidance beliefs, embarrassment avoidance beliefs, symptom focusing) and behavioral responses (resting or avoidance of activity, all-or-nothing behavior) to fatigue one's connected to one's perceptions of fatigue via a 5-point Likert-type scale. The summed total subscale scores range from 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate a more negative response to fatigue.
Participation in Social Roles and ActivitiesCollected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SRA; Hahn et al., 2010). The 8-item short form version of the PROMIS-SRA assesses the perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Raw summed scores are converted to T-scores standardized to the U.S. general population (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher scores indicating better ability to participate in social roles and activities.
Relaxation/SerenityCollected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).Relaxation/Serenity will be measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Serenity Subscale. This is a 3-item self-report subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule assessing perceptions of feeling of calm, relaxed, and at ease over the previous week via a 5-point Likert-type scale. The summed total score ranges from 3-15 and a higher score indicates greater feelings of relaxation/serenity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from a multiple sclerosis comprehensive care center from October 2023 to August 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Thirty individuals were screened for eligibility. Seven individuals were ineligible due to MS relapse in prior 30 days (n=1), disease modifying therapy change in prior 3 months (n=1), score lower than 4 on the Fatigue Severity Scale (n=3), significant cognitive impairment (n=1), and no MS diagnosis (n=1). One individual declined to participant due to the time commitment for study participation. One individual was excluded because research staff were unable to contact them after several attempts

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Relaxation Training
Didactic and experiential training in one or more relaxation techniques such as diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, autogenic relaxation, and guided imagery to reduce autonomic nervous system arousal.
7
Behavioral Activation
Didactic material and practice focused on identification and reduction of avoidance behaviors (e.g., excessive rest) and increased engagement in valued and reinforcing activities (e.g., physical activity, social engagement).
7
Cognitive Therapy
Didactic material and practice focused on identifying, challenging, and modifying inaccurate and/or unhelpful patterns of thought about the self and the world (e.g., catastrophizing the meaning and consequences of fatigue) to change unwanted behavioral patterns (e.g., excessive rest).
7
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRelaxation TrainingCognitive TherapyBehavioral Activation
Age, Continuous47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants6 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants6 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants4 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 70 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 70 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Intervention Acceptability

Intervention Acceptability will be measured with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). When assessed via online survey, responses from the Intervention Acceptability items are averaged to create a mean score \[1-5\]. A higher score indicates more agreement with intervention acceptability while a lower score indicates less agreement with intervention acceptability.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingIntervention Acceptability4.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Behavioral ActivationIntervention Acceptability4.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Cognitive TherapyIntervention Acceptability4.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Primary

Intervention Appropriateness

Intervention Appropriateness will be measured with the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). When assessed via online survey, responses from the Intervention Appropriateness items are averaged to create a mean score \[1-5\]. A higher score indicates more agreement with intervention appropriateness while a lower score indicates less agreement with intervention appropriateness.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingIntervention Appropriateness4.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Behavioral ActivationIntervention Appropriateness4.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Cognitive TherapyIntervention Appropriateness4.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Primary

Intervention Feasibility

Intervention Feasibility will be measured with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). When assessed via online survey, responses from the Intervention Feasibility items are averaged to create a mean score \[1-5\]. A higher score indicates more agreement with intervention feasibility while a lower score indicates less agreement with intervention feasibility.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingIntervention Feasibility4.46 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Behavioral ActivationIntervention Feasibility4.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Cognitive TherapyIntervention Feasibility4.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Secondary

Behavioral Activation

Behavioral activation will be measured by the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale Short Form. This is a 9-item self-report measure. It assess the extent to which the respondent thinks they have engaged in pleasant and/or goal-directed activity over the past week via a 7-point Likert-type scale. Summed total scores range from 0 to 54, and a higher score indicates greater behavioral activation.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingBehavioral ActivationPre-treatment27.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Relaxation TrainingBehavioral ActivationPost-treatment27.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
Behavioral ActivationBehavioral ActivationPre-treatment24.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.11
Behavioral ActivationBehavioral ActivationPost-treatment35.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.02
Cognitive TherapyBehavioral ActivationPre-treatment29.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34
Cognitive TherapyBehavioral ActivationPost-treatment38.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Cognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short Form

This is a 18-item self-report questionnaire consisting of five subscales assessing cognitive responses (fear avoidance beliefs, embarrassment avoidance beliefs, symptom focusing) and behavioral responses (resting or avoidance of activity, all-or-nothing behavior) to fatigue one's connected to one's perceptions of fatigue via a 5-point Likert-type scale. The summed total subscale scores range from 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate a more negative response to fatigue.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormFear Avoidance Beliefs at Pre-treatment4.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormFear Avoidance Beliefs at Post-treatment4.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormEmbarrassment Avoidance Beliefs at Pre-treatment7.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormEmbarrassment Avoidance Beliefs at Post-treatment7.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.39
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormSymptom Focusing at Pre-treatment7.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.34
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormSymptom Focusing at Post-treatment6.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormResting or Avoidance of Activity at Pre-treatment4.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormResting or Avoidance of Activity at Post-treatment4.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.58
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormAll-or-nothing Behavior at Pre-treatment9.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Relaxation TrainingCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormAll-or-nothing Behavior at Post-treatment8.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormAll-or-nothing Behavior at Pre-treatment10.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormFear Avoidance Beliefs at Pre-treatment5.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormSymptom Focusing at Post-treatment4.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.83
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormSymptom Focusing at Pre-treatment6.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormFear Avoidance Beliefs at Post-treatment5.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormAll-or-nothing Behavior at Post-treatment7.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormResting or Avoidance of Activity at Post-treatment5.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormEmbarrassment Avoidance Beliefs at Pre-treatment6.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormResting or Avoidance of Activity at Pre-treatment6.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Behavioral ActivationCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormEmbarrassment Avoidance Beliefs at Post-treatment6.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.41
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormResting or Avoidance of Activity at Post-treatment7.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.26
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormEmbarrassment Avoidance Beliefs at Post-treatment6.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormSymptom Focusing at Pre-treatment6.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormSymptom Focusing at Post-treatment4.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormAll-or-nothing Behavior at Pre-treatment9.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormResting or Avoidance of Activity at Pre-treatment7.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.59
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormFear Avoidance Beliefs at Pre-treatment6.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.55
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormAll-or-nothing Behavior at Post-treatment7.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormFear Avoidance Beliefs at Post-treatment4.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.26
Cognitive TherapyCognitive Behavioural Responses Questionnaire - Short FormEmbarrassment Avoidance Beliefs at Pre-treatment6.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.06
Secondary

Fatigue

Fatigue will be measured by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. This is a 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing fatigue-related symptoms in the previous four weeks via 5-point Likert-type scale. It yields a total score (range: 0-84) and a higher score indicates greater fatigue.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingFatiguePre-treatment44.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
Relaxation TrainingFatiguePost-treatment36.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
Behavioral ActivationFatiguePre-treatment49.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.74
Behavioral ActivationFatiguePost-treatment34.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.27
Cognitive TherapyFatiguePre-treatment54.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.15
Cognitive TherapyFatiguePost-treatment37.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Secondary

Fatigue Catastrophizing

Fatigue catastrophizing will be measured by the Fatigue Catastrophizing Scale. This is a 13-item self-report questionnaire assessing negative beliefs or expectations connected to one's perceptions of fatigue via a 5-point Likert-type scale. Summed total scores range from 0 to 52, and a higher score indicates greater fatigue catastrophizing.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingFatigue CatastrophizingPre-treatment20.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
Relaxation TrainingFatigue CatastrophizingPost-treatment19.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.34
Behavioral ActivationFatigue CatastrophizingPre-treatment18.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.17
Behavioral ActivationFatigue CatastrophizingPost-treatment15.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.25
Cognitive TherapyFatigue CatastrophizingPre-treatment15.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
Cognitive TherapyFatigue CatastrophizingPost-treatment11.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Secondary

Global Impression of Change

This is a single-item self-report scale that assess the perceived intervention-related change in one's activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life via 7-point Likert-type scale. The score ranges from 0 to 6 and a higher score indicates greater perceived change.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingGlobal Impression of Change4.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Behavioral ActivationGlobal Impression of Change4.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Cognitive TherapyGlobal Impression of Change4.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Secondary

Participation in Social Roles and Activities

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SRA; Hahn et al., 2010). The 8-item short form version of the PROMIS-SRA assesses the perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Raw summed scores are converted to T-scores standardized to the U.S. general population (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher scores indicating better ability to participate in social roles and activities.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingParticipation in Social Roles and ActivitiesPre-treatment43.23 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.09
Relaxation TrainingParticipation in Social Roles and ActivitiesPost-treatment43.64 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.42
Behavioral ActivationParticipation in Social Roles and ActivitiesPre-treatment41.39 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.44
Behavioral ActivationParticipation in Social Roles and ActivitiesPost-treatment46.30 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.52
Cognitive TherapyParticipation in Social Roles and ActivitiesPre-treatment40.47 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.31
Cognitive TherapyParticipation in Social Roles and ActivitiesPost-treatment44.04 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.28
Secondary

Relaxation/Serenity

Relaxation/Serenity will be measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Serenity Subscale. This is a 3-item self-report subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule assessing perceptions of feeling of calm, relaxed, and at ease over the previous week via a 5-point Likert-type scale. The summed total score ranges from 3-15 and a higher score indicates greater feelings of relaxation/serenity.

Time frame: Collected via online survey at pre-treatment (up to 4 weeks before treatment session 1) and post-treatment (approximately 4-8 weeks after the pre-treatment survey).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relaxation TrainingRelaxation/SerenityPre-treatment9.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Relaxation TrainingRelaxation/SerenityPost-treatment11.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Behavioral ActivationRelaxation/SerenityPre-treatment8.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Behavioral ActivationRelaxation/SerenityPost-treatment10.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Cognitive TherapyRelaxation/SerenityPre-treatment9.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.24
Cognitive TherapyRelaxation/SerenityPost-treatment11.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026