Skip to content

EBRA Study AMISTEM-C FR

Prospective, Single-Center, Non-Controlled, Non-Randomized, Open Study Evaluating the Performance and Stability of Amistem® C

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05848024
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-05-08
Start date
2017-02-08
Completion date
2029-02-28
Last updated
2025-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Hip Arthroplasty

Brief summary

Primary objective: Evaluate femoral stem migration Secondary objective: Evaluate the performance of AMIStem H Proximal Coating at 10 years after surgery; assessment of functional recovery; radiological evaluation; reporting of complications Scores collected: HHS, OHS, PMA, UCLA

Detailed description

The main objective of the study was to evaluate the migration and performance of the AMIStem® C femoral stem at 10 years follow-up. The primary endpoint is the measurement of femoral component migration by EBRA-FCA (The Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse-femoral component analysis, Innsbruck, Austria) The secondary objectives of the study are: Evaluate the performance of the AMIStem® C stem Evaluate the function of the operated hip To evaluate the quality of life To evaluate the safety of the AMIStem® C femoral stem Evaluate the postoperative stability and fixation of the hip prosthesis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medacta International SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are: 1. Patient with a disease (primary coxarthrosis, inflammatory arthritis of the hip, necrosis of the femoral head...) requiring the placement of a total hip prosthesis. 2. Patient who will receive an AMIStem® C cemented femoral stem. 3. Patient willing to comply with the study requirements 4. Patient who has signed the information letter agreeing to the processing of their data in the clinical evaluation 5. Patient affiliated to a social security system 6. Patients aged 18 to 85 years The criteria for non-inclusion are: 1. Participation in biomedical research 2. Minor patients 3. Protected adult patients 4. Vulnerable persons according to article L1121-6 of the Public Health Code 5. Pregnant or breastfeeding women 6. Patients unable to formulate their non-opposition 7. Patient refusing collection of personal data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the femoral stem migration2 yearsThe primary endpoint is the measurement of femoral component migration by EBRA-FCA software (The Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse-femoral component analysis, Innsbruck, Austria) with an accuracy of ± 1.5 mm (95% percentile), a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 78% for the detection of a migration of more than 1.0 mm, referring to the RSA method. The EBRA-FCA method is based on the detection of 19 points on the bony femur and the femoral component, as well as two lines to determine the axis of the implant on successive radiographs of the front pelvis. The correction of the radiological enlargement is performed based on the known diameter of the prosthetic femoral component. Lengths are measured from anatomical reference points to ensure comparability of the radiographs. The change in the distance between the top of the greater trochanter and the shoulder of the prosthesis is used to measure the migration of the femoral component.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the functionality of the operated hippre-op, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsEvaluation of the Harris Hip Score The Harris Hip Score (HHS) items include an analysis of the operated hip according to pain, function, mobility, stability and deformity analysis. The Harris Hip Score will be used to assess the patient's subjective and objective improvement in the above criteria. The usefulness of this score has been studied to estimate the clinical results after THR, it is a reference score in the field of orthopedics. The Harris hip score is scored from 0 (worst functional outcome and maximum pain) to 100 points (best functional outcome and least pain).
Assess the Quality of Life of patientspre-op, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsMerle d'Aubigné functional score The Postel and Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score: a method for grading the functional value of the hip form a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 18 points.
Assess the AMIStem C performance at 10 years10 yearsThe survival rate according to a Kaplan Meier curve. The Kaplan-Meier method calculates the survival of the prosthesis by measuring the fraction of living subjects during a period after the procedure. Each time an expected event occurs (revision of the prosthesis, patients lost to follow-up, death, etc.), the probability of implant survival changes. This information is used to estimate the performance of the prosthesis. During the study, the number of stem revisions and the number of patients who died or were lost to follow-up will be collected to calculate the probability of survival. The time of occurrence will be recorded for each event.
Assess the postoperative stability and fixation of AMIStem Cpre-op, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsCollection of Oxford Hip Score: It is a score composed of 12 questions evaluating the function and pain of the hip before and after arthroplasty. The scores for the 0-48 scale can be interpreted as follows\[6\]: Score 0 to 19 May indicate severe hip arthritis. It is highly likely that you may well require some form of surgical intervention, contact your family physician for a consult with an orthopaedic surgeon. Score 20 to 29 May indicate moderate to severe hip arthritis. See your family physician for an assessment and x-ray. Consider a consult with an orthopaedic surgeon. Score 30 to 39 May indicate mild to moderate hip arthritis. Consider seeing your family physician for an assessment and possible x-ray. You may benefit from non-surgical treatment, such as exercise, weight loss, and/ or anti-inflammatory medication. Score 40 to 48 May indicate satisfactory joint function. May not require any formal treatment.
Radiological analysispre-op, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years-Standard X-ray to identify radiolucencies and endosteal cavitations
Assess the security of AMIStem C and collect complicationspre-op, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsCollection of intra- and postoperative complications (infection, loosening,etc)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026