Skip to content

MASC: Reducing Stress for Caregivers

The Mindful and Self-Compassionate Care Program Aim 2

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05847153
Acronym
MASC
Enrollment
13
Registered
2023-05-06
Start date
2023-09-12
Completion date
2024-01-13
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias, Dementia Alzheimers

Keywords

ADRD, Caregiver stress, Dementia, Alzheimer, Self-compassion

Brief summary

Building on limitations of prior research, the investigators proposed to develop the Mindful and Self-Compassionate Care Program (MASC) to help caregivers of persons with Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) manage stress associated with the general caregiver experience including stress stemming from managing challenging patient behaviors. MASC teaches: (1) mindfulness skills; (2) compassion and self-compassion skills; and (3) behavioral management skills. MASC also provides psychoeducation and group-based training and skill practice to facilitate skill uptake and integration within the caregiver experience and tasks.

Detailed description

Over half of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) caregivers are actively looking for non-pharmacological interventions to decrease caregiver stress. Available programs do not meet the psychological and practical needs of stressed caregivers of persons with ADRD; better solutions are needed. First, while helpful, most support groups do not systematically teach behavioral management skills which caregivers report needing in order to manage challenging patient behaviors. Second, behavioral management skills interventions exist, but do not teach: 1) emotional regulation skills which are necessary in order to foster caregiver ability to access and use these skills to manage patient behaviors, and/or 2) self-compassion and compassion skills which are necessary to bypass guilt and loneliness and navigate behavioral symptoms which are common caregiver challenges. Third, mindfulness and self-compassion interventions are effective solutions for managing stress, and distress across multiple populations, but engagement and efficacy among diverse ADRD caregivers are limited. The guiding hypothesis of this proposal is that combining evidence-based mindfulness and self-compassion skills with behavioral management skills within a multi-component program increases intervention potency and efficiently supports caregivers of persons with ADRD. Accounting for practical challenges to engagement (nr. sessions, delivery modality, skill practice) will also enhance uptake and reach. The investigators will conduct an open pilot with exit interviews to explore feasibility benchmarks, target engagement and signal of improvement in stress, depression, anxiety and wellbeing (NIH stage 1A; N= up to 20 caregivers; N= up to 2 groups. Exit interviews will last 30 minutes and will be recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to refine study procedures. The investigators will use this information to revise and optimize MASC and our conceptual model, as needed to maximize feasibility and target engagement. The investigators will recruit caregivers of persons with ADRD from local community organizations and caregiver support programs; dementia research programs; and from national programs that focus on caregiving.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMASC

The intervention arm will be comprised of: 1. Six Virtual Group Sessions. The sessions will teach mindfulness, self-compassion and behavioral management skills. 2. At Home Practice. After each group session, participants will have the opportunity to integrate the practices learned into their everyday life.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

MASC is an intervention that includes evidence based skills of: 1) mindfulness; 2) compassion toward others and self; 3) behavioral management skills. MASC has 6 sessions delivered in a group format over secure live video with Zoom. Each session includes psychoeducation on program skills, skill practice, strategies to incorporate the skill into the caregiver experience, and strategies for sustained practice.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * English fluency and literacy * Meeting criteria for being a caregiver (e.g., family or friend of a care recipient who provides unpaid care) * Must live with and care for an individual with ADRD * Must have been in a caregiver role for more than 6 months * Must provide an average 4 hours of supervision or direct assistance per day for the are recipient * Perceived Stress Scale-4 (4-item) version \>=6 * Had managed 1 or more behavioral symptoms in past month

Exclusion criteria

* Recent change ini psychotropic treatment for depression or anxiety * Use of mindfulness apps or any meditation (more than 60 min/week in past 6 months) * Involvement in another clinical trial for caregivers, a score \>= 4 on the Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (PMSQ) * No stated concerns or distress related to care recipient's disruptive behaviors * Involvement in another clinical trial for caregivers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of RecruitmentBaselineThe investigators will examine feasibility of recruitment overall. The investigators will report proportion of eligible participants who are eligible and choose to enroll in the study. The investigators will also explore the percent of racial and ethnically diverse participants across the entire sample. Benchmark: ≥70% of participants who are eligible will enroll; ≥38% of participants are racial and ethnic minorities (US representation)
Number of Participants With Less Than 25% of Missing Questionnaires at BaselineBaselineThe investigators will calculate the proportion of participants completing the study who have less than 25% of missing questionnaires. Benchmark: ≥70% participants will have less than 25% missing questionnaires.
Number of Participants With Less Than 25% of Missing Questionnaires at Post-InterventionPost-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants completing the study who have less than 25% of missing questionnaires. Benchmark: ≥70% participants will have less than 25% missing questionnaires.
Number of Participants With no Questionnaries Missing Fully at BaselineBaselineThe investigators will assess the feasibility of the quantitative measures sent to participants. Benchmark: No questionnaires missing fully in ≥25% participants.
Number of Participants With no Questionnaries Missing Fully at Post-interventionPost-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)The investigators will assess the feasibility of the quantitative measures sent to participants. Benchmark: No questionnaires missing fully in ≥25% participants.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristine S Ritchie, MD, MSPH

Massachusetts General Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAna-Maria Vranceanu, PhD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
The intervention arm will be comprised of: 1. Six Virtual Group Sessions. The sessions will teach mindfulness, self-compassion and behavioral management skills. 2. At Home Practice. After each group session, participants will have the opportunity to integrate the practices learned into their everyday life.
13
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous62.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.15
Applied Mindfulness Process Scale Amps34.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.92
Center For Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale22.15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.08
Compassion Scale4.23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.52
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List35.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPIQ)
NPI-Distress
17.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.32
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPIQ)
NPI- Presence
7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.71
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPIQ)
NPI- Severity
13.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.87
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)21.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07
Positive Affect Index40.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
Revised Scale For Caregiving Self Efficacy56.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.99
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form3.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
UCLA Loneliness Scale6.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.89
WHO-5 Wellbeing Index12.23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.25

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility of Recruitment

The investigators will examine feasibility of recruitment overall. The investigators will report proportion of eligible participants who are eligible and choose to enroll in the study. The investigators will also explore the percent of racial and ethnically diverse participants across the entire sample. Benchmark: ≥70% of participants who are eligible will enroll; ≥38% of participants are racial and ethnic minorities (US representation)

Time frame: Baseline

Population: 16 participants were eligible and 13 chose to enroll. Out of the 13 that chose to enroll, 4 were racial and ethnic minorities.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionFeasibility of RecruitmentEnrolled Participants13 Participants
InterventionFeasibility of RecruitmentRacial and Ethnic Minorities4 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Less Than 25% of Missing Questionnaires at Baseline

The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants completing the study who have less than 25% of missing questionnaires. Benchmark: ≥70% participants will have less than 25% missing questionnaires.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: The number of participants who completed the baseline questionnaire is 13.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Less Than 25% of Missing Questionnaires at Baseline13 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Less Than 25% of Missing Questionnaires at Post-Intervention

The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants completing the study who have less than 25% of missing questionnaires. Benchmark: ≥70% participants will have less than 25% missing questionnaires.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: While 13 participants completed the baseline survey, only 12/13 participants attended the sessions (intervention). Therefore,12 participants were counted as completing the study, which was measured as those who completed the baseline survey and attended the intervention sessions. 11/12 completed participants completed the post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Less Than 25% of Missing Questionnaires at Post-Intervention11 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With no Questionnaries Missing Fully at Baseline

The investigators will assess the feasibility of the quantitative measures sent to participants. Benchmark: No questionnaires missing fully in ≥25% participants.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With no Questionnaries Missing Fully at Baseline13 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With no Questionnaries Missing Fully at Post-intervention

The investigators will assess the feasibility of the quantitative measures sent to participants. Benchmark: No questionnaires missing fully in ≥25% participants.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With no Questionnaries Missing Fully at Post-intervention11 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Adherence to Home Practice

The investigators will report proportion of participants who complete weekly home practice.

Time frame: Weekly (up to 5 weeks)

Population: 12/13 participants attended sessions and were sent homepractice surveys.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionAdherence to Home PracticeWeek 110 Participants
InterventionAdherence to Home PracticeWeek 28 Participants
InterventionAdherence to Home PracticeWeek 38 Participants
InterventionAdherence to Home PracticeWeek 46 Participants
InterventionAdherence to Home PracticeWeek 57 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Applied Mindfulness Process Scale

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a process measure used to quantify how participants in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) use mindfulness practice when facing challenges in daily life. Development and validation of the AMPS yielded 15 items representing three domains of applied mindfulness processes: (a) decentering, (b) positive emotional regulation, and (c) negative emotional regulation. Increases over time in AMPS scores suggest greater application of the use of mindfulness skills in daily life coinciding with mindfulness practice. Instructions for scoring:(1) Sum each factor individually to obtain a score ranging from 0-20, and/or (2) sum all 15 items to obtain a score ranging from 0-60. This is used as a replacement for the FFMQ.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 10/13 participants completed the post-intervention AMPS survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionApplied Mindfulness Process Scale38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.44
Other Pre-specified

Applied Mindfulness Process Scale

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a process measure used to quantify how participants in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) use mindfulness practice when facing challenges in daily life. Development and validation of the AMPS yielded 15 items representing three domains of applied mindfulness processes: (a) decentering, (b) positive emotional regulation, and (c) negative emotional regulation. Increases over time in AMPS scores suggest greater application of the use of mindfulness skills in daily life coinciding with mindfulness practice. Instructions for scoring:(1) Sum each factor individually to obtain a score ranging from 0-20, and/or (2) sum all 15 items to obtain a score ranging from 0-60. This is used as a replacement for the FFMQ.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionApplied Mindfulness Process Scale34.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.92
Other Pre-specified

Caregiver Self-efficacy

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCaregiver Self-efficacy56.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
Other Pre-specified

Caregiver Self-efficacy

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 9/13 participants completed the RSCSE post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCaregiver Self-efficacy58.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.72
Other Pre-specified

Compassion

The Compassion Scale (CS) has 16 items assessing common humanity, kindness toward others and ability to understand the suffering or challenges of others. Kindness items: 2, 6, 10, 14 Common Humanity items: 4, 8, 12, 16 Mindfulness items: 1, 5, 9, 13 Indifference items (reverse scored): 3, 7, 11, 15. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of the four subscale item responses. To compute a total compassion score, reverse score the indifference items then take a grand mean of all items. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on indifference items indicate less compassion before reverse-coding, and more compassion after reverse coding. Participants can choose to report indifference scores with or without reverse-coding, but items must be reverse coded before calculating a total compassion score.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCompassion4.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Other Pre-specified

Compassion

The Compassion Scale (CS) has 16 items assessing common humanity, kindness toward others and ability to understand the suffering or challenges of others. Kindness items: 2, 6, 10, 14 Common Humanity items: 4, 8, 12, 16 Mindfulness items: 1, 5, 9, 13 Indifference items (reverse scored): 3, 7, 11, 15. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of the four subscale item responses. To compute a total compassion score, reverse score the indifference items then take a grand mean of all items. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on indifference items indicate less compassion before reverse-coding, and more compassion after reverse coding. Participants can choose to report indifference scores with or without reverse-coding, but items must be reverse coded before calculating a total compassion score.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 10/13 participants completed the CS post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCompassion4.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Other Pre-specified

Credibility and Expectancy

The investigators will use the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) to assess participants' perceptions that the treatment will work after participating in the intervention. The CEQ utilizes two scales during the administration (1-9, and 0-100%), and so a composite score was derived for each factor (expectancy and credibility) by first standardizing the individual items and then summing those items for each factor. The minimum score is a 1, indicating worse outcome and less credibility and the maximum score is a 9, indicating a better outcome and more credibility.

Time frame: Post-Intervention

Population: 9/13 participants filled out the post-intervention CEQ survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCredibility and Expectancy8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Other Pre-specified

Distress Due to Patient Challenges Behaviors

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale has 12 items assessing distress associated with dementia patient's behaviors such as apathy, elation, disinhibition. Participant distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom domain on a scale anchored by score from 0 to 5 points. The Score is: 0 = Not distressing at all, 1 = Minimal (slightly distressing, not a problem to cope with), 2 = Mild (not very distressing, generally easy to cope with), 3 = Moderate (fairly distressing, not always easy to cope with), 4 = Severe (very distressing, difficult to cope with), 5 = Extreme of Very Severe (extremely distressing, unable to cope with). The minimum is 0, indicating less distress and a better outcome and he maximum is 60, indicating more distress and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 11/13 participants completed the NPI distress post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionDistress Due to Patient Challenges Behaviors15.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.92
Other Pre-specified

Distress Due to Patient Challenges Behaviors

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale has 12 items assessing distress associated with dementia patient's behaviors such as apathy, elation, disinhibition. Participant distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom domain on a scale anchored by score from 0 to 5 points. The Score is: 0 = Not distressing at all, 1 = Minimal (slightly distressing, not a problem to cope with), 2 = Mild (not very distressing, generally easy to cope with), 3 = Moderate (fairly distressing, not always easy to cope with), 4 = Severe (very distressing, difficult to cope with), 5 = Extreme of Very Severe (extremely distressing, unable to cope with). The minimum is 0, indicating less distress and a better outcome and he maximum is 60, indicating more distress and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionDistress Due to Patient Challenges Behaviors17.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
Other Pre-specified

Loneliness

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item loneliness scale assess relational connectedness, social connectedness and self-perceived isolation. The scores for each individual question can be added together to give participants a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. Researchers in the past have grouped people who score 3 - 5 as not lonely and people with the score 6 - 9 as lonely.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionLoneliness6.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Other Pre-specified

Loneliness

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item loneliness scale assess relational connectedness, social connectedness and self-perceived isolation. The scores for each individual question can be added together to give participants a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. Researchers in the past have grouped people who score 3 - 5 as not lonely and people with the score 6 - 9 as lonely.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 11/13 participants completed the UCLA post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionLoneliness5.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Other Pre-specified

Mindfulness

The investigators will use the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to assess caregivers mindfulness based on 5 subscales (observing, describing, awareness, non-judging, non-reactivity). Average scores are calculated by summing the responses and dividing by the number of items, and indicate the average level of agreement with the each subscale (1 = rarely true, 5 = always true). Higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life. Its facet scores range from 3-15.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Other Pre-specified

Mindfulness

The investigators will use the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to assess caregivers mindfulness based on 5 subscales (observing, describing, awareness, non-judging, non-reactivity). Average scores are calculated by summing the responses and dividing by the number of items, and indicate the average level of agreement with the each subscale (1 = rarely true, 5 = always true). Higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life. Its facet scores range from 3-15.

Time frame: Baseline

Other Pre-specified

Modified Perception of Global Improvement

The Modified Perception of Global Improvement (MPGI) is a global index designed to measure a participant's interpretation of changes in perceptions of stress following intervention. 0 indicates not improved and 1 indicates improved.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 9/13 participants completed the MPGI post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionModified Perception of Global Improvement0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Other Pre-specified

Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The investigators will ask participants about their perceptions of whether or not they feel that they improved in stress, depression, anxiety and wellbeing. PGIC is a 5 point scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, or much worse. A score of 1 is much worse and 5 is much improved.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 10/13 participants completed the PGIC post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Other Pre-specified

Perceived Stress Scale

The investigators will use the Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10) to assess perceived stress using a 5-point Likert scale. Scoring Instructions: Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Questions 2 and 3 are reverse coded. Questions 1 and 4: 0 = Never; 1 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Fairly often; 4 = Very often Questions 2 and 3: 4 = Never; 3 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 1 = Fairly often; 0 = Very often. Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more stress.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPerceived Stress Scale21.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Other Pre-specified

Perceived Stress Scale

The investigators will use the Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10) to assess perceived stress using a 5-point Likert scale. Scoring Instructions: Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Questions 2 and 3 are reverse coded. Questions 1 and 4: 0 = Never; 1 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Fairly often; 4 = Very often Questions 2 and 3: 4 = Never; 3 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 1 = Fairly often; 0 = Very often. Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more stress.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 11/13 participants completed the post-intervention PSS-10 survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPerceived Stress Scale16.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.44
Other Pre-specified

Perceptions of Email and Text Reminders

The investigators will assess participants' perception of emails and text messages reminders by asking, Do participants think that the amount of emails/texts received was: too little, just enough, too much?

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Other Pre-specified

Perceptions of Questionnaire Battery

The investigators will use the 'Perceptions of Questionnaire Battery' qualitative measure to assess how appropriately the participants fill the questionnaires, address their perception of stress, emotional distress and all other questionnaires.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Other Pre-specified

Positive Affect Index

The Positive Affect Index (PAI) (5 items) assesses communication quality, closeness, similarity of views on life, engagement in joint activities and overall relationship quality. Each item is rated on a six-point scale and responses are summed for a total score. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 10/13 participants completed the PAI post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPositive Affect Index38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Other Pre-specified

Positive Affect Index

The Positive Affect Index (PAI) (5 items) assesses communication quality, closeness, similarity of views on life, engagement in joint activities and overall relationship quality. Each item is rated on a six-point scale and responses are summed for a total score. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPositive Affect Index40.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.17
Other Pre-specified

Satisfaction With the Intervention

The investigators will use the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3) to assess participants' satisfaction with the intervention. The questionnaire consists of 3 questions rating participants' satisfaction on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being not satisfied at all and 4 being very satisfied. Total possible score is 12 and the least possible score is 3.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 10/13 participants completed the CSQ post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSatisfaction With the Intervention10.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Other Pre-specified

Social Support

Interpersonal Support Evaluation List short form (ISEL) has 12 items assessing appraisal, belonging and tangible social support. A 12-item measure of perceptions of social support. Response options range from 1-4 with 4 = definitely true if the participant is sure it is true about them, 3= probably true if the participant thinks it is true but is not absolutely certain. Similarly, the participant should circle 1 = definitely false if they are sure the statement is false and 2 = probably false if the participant thinks it is false but is not absolutely certain. This questionnaire has three different subscales designed to measure three dimensions of perceived social support. These dimensions are: 1.) Appraisal Support 2.) Belonging Support 3.) Tangible Support Each dimension is measured by 4 items on a 4-point scale ranging from Definitely True to Definitely False. The minimum score is 12 and the maximum is 48. Higher scores are a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSocial Support35.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Other Pre-specified

Social Support

A 12-item measure of perceptions of social support. Response options range from 1-4 with 4 = definitely true if the participant is sure it is true about them, 3= probably true if the participant thinks it is true but is not absolutely certain. Similarly, the participant should circle 1 = definitely false if they are sure the statement is false and 2 = probably false if the participant thinks it is false but is not absolutely certain. This questionnaire has three different subscales designed to measure three dimensions of perceived social support. These dimensions are: 1.) Appraisal Support 2.) Belonging Support 3.) Tangible Support Each dimension is measured by 4 items on a 4-point scale ranging from Definitely True to Definitely False. The minimum score is 12 and the maximum is 48. Higher scores are a better outcome.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 11/13 participants completed the ISEL post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSocial Support37.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.37
Other Pre-specified

Symptoms of Anxiety

The investigators will use State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) state subscales (20 items) to assess anxiety symptoms in response to stressful situations. STA has been successfully used with ADRD participants. The range of possible scores varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80. STAI scores are commonly classified as no or low anxiety (20-37), moderate anxiety (38-44), and high anxiety (45-80).

Time frame: Baseline

Other Pre-specified

Symptoms of Anxiety

The investigators will use State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) state subscales (20 items) to assess anxiety symptoms in response to stressful situations. STA has been successfully used with ADRD participants. The range of possible scores varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80. STAI scores are commonly classified as no or low anxiety (20-37), moderate anxiety (38-44), and high anxiety (45-80).

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Other Pre-specified

Symptoms of Depression

The investigators will use the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). This is a 20-item scale widely used with ADRD participants. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time) In scoring the CES-D, possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 11/13 participants completed the post-intervention CES-D survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSymptoms of Depression16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
Other Pre-specified

Symptoms of Depression

The investigators will use the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). This is a 20-item scale widely used with ADRD participants. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time) In scoring the CES-D, possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSymptoms of Depression22.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.08
Other Pre-specified

Therapist Fidelity

The investigators will assess both therapists' ability to deliver the content of each session (through therapist completed adherence checklists) and therapist fidelity (through independent review of recorded sessions by Co-Investigator). Ratings will be given for each of six sessions on the following scale: 1=Not Present,3=Slightly Present,5=Moderately Present,7=Often Present,10=Always Present. An average score of 10 for all sessions represents all content always delivered, and an average score of 1 represents no content delivered as intended. Benchmark: \>=75% of MASC sessions components delivered as intended; 20% sessions rated.

Time frame: Baseline through Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: Both groups were analyzed with 6 sessions in each group. Number of participants in both sessions varied from 9-12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTherapist Fidelity8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Other Pre-specified

The Self-Compassion Scale

The Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) is a 12-item self-report measure that is used by adults to measure their capacity for self-compassion - the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern. Self-Kindness Items: 2, 6 Self-Judgment Items (Reverse Scored): 11, 12 Common Humanity Items: 5, 10 Isolation Items: 4, 8 Mindfulness Items: 3, 7 Over-identification Items : 1, 9 = max score of 8 per category

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 10/13 participants completed the post-intervention SCS survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionThe Self-Compassion Scale3.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Other Pre-specified

The Self-Compassion Scale

The Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) is a 12-item self-report measure that is used by adults to measure their capacity for self-compassion - the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern. Self-Kindness Items: 2, 6 Self-Judgment Items (Reverse Scored): 11, 12 Common Humanity Items: 5, 10 Isolation Items: 4, 8 Mindfulness Items: 3, 7 Over-identification Items : 1, 9 = max score of 8 per category

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionThe Self-Compassion Scale3.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Other Pre-specified

Well-being

World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has 5 items assessing emotional well-being. The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life The outcome measure represents the mean of the raw score.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionWell-being12.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
Other Pre-specified

Well-being

World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has 5 items assessing emotional well-being. The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life The outcome measure represents the mean of the raw score.

Time frame: Post-intervention (6-8 weeks post baseline)

Population: 9/13 participants complete the WHO post-intervention survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionWell-being15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026