Skip to content

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema:

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema: Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Treatment and Retreatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05847088
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-05-06
Start date
2023-02-15
Completion date
2023-04-04
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

We have been using DEX for refractory DME for a long time (since 2016). Thus, we are sharing our results , evaluating both anatomical and functional outcomes of DEX therapy for refractory DME.

Detailed description

Our study aims at evaluating both anatomical and functional outcomes of DEX therapy for cases of refractory DME, with both a single injection, and /or with retreatments.

Interventions

DRUGIntravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for refractory Diabetic macular edema:

Intravitreal Dexamethasone implants (DEX) (0.7 mg) (Ozurdex, Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) had been used with greater efficacy and safety in DME.

Sponsors

Dar El Oyoun Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Age: 16 or older (Adults) * Sex: both * NTDME with CMT \>300 u * \< 10% reduction in CMT (than previous treatment) * \< 50 u reduction in CMT (than previous treatment) * Worsening of BCVA \> 1 line on E chart. * Duration since Previous treatment is: 3 months with DEX, 1 month with Anti-VEGF * Pseudophakic eyes * NPDR , PRP-treated PDR

Exclusion criteria

* • Phakic eyes * Uncontrolled Glaucoma (IOP \> 24 mmHg, or cup disc ratio 0.8 or more) * Herpetic viral infection. * Untreated PDR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Central macular thickness (in microns) (CMT change )between baseline and 6 monthsChange in Central macular thickness (in microns) (CMT change )
Change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA change) )between baseline and 6 monthslines of Change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA change) )

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of follow-up ( months)between baseline and 6 monthsDuration of follow-up ( months)
CMT change > 100 ubetween baseline and 6 monthsCMT change \> 100 u (yes / No)
Number of DEX injectionsbetween baseline and 6 monthsNumber of DEX injections
BCVA change >= 2 linesbetween baseline and 6 monthsBCVA change \>= 2 lines (yes / No)
Complications : ocular hypertension, pseudo uveitis, endophthalmitis, RDbetween baseline and 6 monthsComplications : ocular hypertension, pseudo uveitis, endophthalmitis, RD (yes / No)
CMT change > 200 ubetween baseline and 6 monthsCMT change \> 200 u (yes / No)
Shift to anti-VEGF during follow-upbetween baseline and 6 monthsShift to anti-VEGF during follow-up (Yes or No)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026