HIV, Hypertension
Conditions
Brief summary
Using qualitative data during the formative phase the IHEART-SA research study filled deficiencies in knowledge regarding: 1) what barriers exist to integrating hypertension care within the HIV care setting in South Africa and, 2) how a hypertension care intervention can be adapted to effectively and sustainably function in this care setting. These data have been used to design a context-relevant intervention package for implementation in the next phase of effectiveness-implementation testing, answering the research question: How does an intervention aimed at enhancing hypertension diagnosis and management in people living with HIV improve the delivery of guideline-recommended care in primary healthcare clinics in Gauteng, South Africa, and hypertension control among patients? The study will use an effectiveness-implementation study design. This design allows for the testing of strategies to promote integration of proven interventions in real-world practice (i.e., implementation strategies), while simultaneously assessing clinical effectiveness (i.e., patient level outcomes). For this the study will use a randomized cluster stepped-wedge study design where nine clinics (grouped in clusters of three) will be assigned to a time at which they initiate the intervention.
Detailed description
Investigational interventions: Implementation facilitation of improved hypertension screening and management in the HIV care setting through the iHEART-SA intervention model comprising: 1. Information management system 2. Task shifting 3. Audit and feedback 4. Healthcare worker education and training 5. Patient education and support Study design: Cluster randomized stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation type 2 hybrid Study objectives: 1. Assess the short- and long-term effects of an implementation strategy (i.e., healthcare worker intervention) on the adoption and implementation of hypertension screening and treatment among healthcare workers 2. Assess the short- and long-term effects of a clinical intervention (i.e., patient-level intervention) on patient blood pressure control among patients living with HIV and hypertension Duration of participation: 27 months Study duration: 37 months Intervention audience: 1. Healthcare workers (nurses and doctors) 2. Adult patients living with HIV from the 9 primary healthcare clinics
Interventions
BEHAVIORAL1. Quality and info management system
1. The intervention package prioritizes information and quality management with a focus on HTN screening, diagnosis, and treatment. From the point-of-care, flow charts placed in the patient file will ensure that vitals are performed in accordance with national guidelines. 2. The care coordinator will present data to clinic staff in multi-disciplinary meetings, providing an opportunity for programmatic feedback and discussion. 3. Patients will be encouraged to complete the vital signs measurements at each clinic visit. They will be provided with their BP readings and given info about what their reading means. They will be issued with pocket sized color coded booklets providing info on the measurement and what to do to control their BP. 4. Task shifting: A care coordinator will be the champion of the intervention package for the clinic. 5. All staff will receive apt training on how to use the patient flow chart, info management system and how to respond to abnormal BP values.
Sponsors
Emory University
Massachusetts General Hospital
UMC Utrecht
University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Masking description
There is no masking. This is an intervention study without drugs. Intervention comprises training and education, data and feedback, and task shifting.
Intervention model description
Randomized cluster stepped-wedge study design where clinics will be assigned to a time at which they initiate the intervention. There are nine clinics which have been classification (low, medium and high) according to their volume. One clinic from each classification has been randomized to a cluster such that there are three clusters each with a low, medium and high volume clinic.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Healthcare workers: 1. Adult \>18 years men and women working in clinical roles at the selected clinics 2. Provide informed consent (only those participating in the qualitative components) Patients: 1. Adults \>18 years living with HIV and hypertension 2. Enrolled in the study clinic 3. Willing and able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Patients: 1. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent 2. Planning to relocate or change service providers/clinics
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare worker | 24 months | Difference in percentage of patient visits with recorded BP measurement between intervention and control clinics |
| Patient | 12 months | Difference in mean systolic BP between the intervention and control conditions |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare worker adoption | 24 months | Participation rate and representativeness of healthcare workers who adopt the BP screening and treatment model |
| Healthcare worker maintenance - BP measurement | 12 months | % of patients who had a BP measurement done at every clinic visit |
| Healthcare worker costing | 27 months | Costs of each intervention components will be recorded as healthcare worker time, material costs, and healthcare/monitoring equipment |
| Healthcare worker satisfaction | 24 months | % of healthcare workers who are satisfied with all components of the intervention |
| Patient satisfaction | 24 months | % of patients who are satisfied with all components of the intervention |
| Healthcare worker maintenance - BP management | 12 months | % of patients who had an elevate BP managed at every visit post intervention |
| Patient adoption | 24 months | Participation rate and representativeness of eligible patients who consent to chart review |
| Healthcare worker implementation | 24 months | % of healthcare workers who implement the iHEART-SA package as intended at month 12 and month 24 |
Countries
South Africa
Outcome results
None listed