Skip to content

MySpine MC Versus MySpine Standard

Prospective Comparative Monocentric Research Project Study to Compare Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Insertion Technique With Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique by Use of Patient Specific Drill Guides

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05846477
Acronym
MC vs STD
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-05-06
Start date
2021-02-04
Completion date
2024-02-28
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease, Osteochondrosis, Spondylolysis Lumbar

Brief summary

This research project compares the clinical performance of the cortical bone trajectory CBT insertion technique with the current clinical Gold standard, the Pedicle screw insertion technique. Both techniques are performed by aid of MySpine patient-specific guide systems.

Detailed description

Adult subjects, among those whose clinical condition makes them eligible for a spinal stabilization and meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be invited to participate to the research project and ask to sign a consent in order to further use of personal and clinical data collected during standard practice visit. The primary objective of the research project is to compare clinical outcomes, in terms of assessing the main outcomes of importance to patients with back problems (pain, function, symptom-specific well-being, quality of life, disability), of spine surgery with cortical bone trajectory screw placement technique respect the traditional pedicle screw placement technique. Preoperative data and collected during visit as per standard routine at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postop will be recoreded and assessed for the purpose of this research project.

Interventions

DEVICEMySpine

patient specific guide for screw positioning

Sponsors

Medacta International SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. patients affected by degenerative disc disease, osteochondrosis and grade I spondylolisthesis needing a one/two level surgical treatment with posterior approach and screw fixation 2. those who need a surgical procedure of lumbar spine stabilization from level L1 to level L5. 3. patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to the patient's surgery 4. Healthy patients or patients with mild or severe systemic disease identified as patients with ASA score 1, 2 or 3. 5. Patients with BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 6. non responsive or insufficient response to conservative treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients presenting contraindications as defined by Medacta instruction for use 2. Patients affected by lytic spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylolisthesis with grade≥2 will be excluded 3. Patients \<18 years 4. Patients who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the study 5. Known substance or alcohol abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spine surgical patient outcome changing in the time respect the preoperativebaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsChange in Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the assessment of people affected by degenerative lumbar disease in daily practice

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spine Disability indexbaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsquestionnaire for assessing functional status and quality-of-life impairment in patients with low back pain or spinal cord disease and injury in research and clinical settings. he index enquires about functional limitations in various activities of daily living with the index score ranging from 1 (best) to 100 (worst). Among others, pain intensity, personal hygiene, walking, sleeping, social life, sexual life (optional) and travel are assessed by the patient. Each section has six possible responses, which are scored from 0 to 5.
Pain perceptionbaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsA visual analog scale (from no pain 0 to severe pain 10) to evaluate low back pain
Bone fusionbaseline, 12 monthsA postoperative CT scan will be performed to asses bone fusion at index level defining the presence of bridging bone.
Incidence of adverse event Device-relatedbaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsColleciton of all adverse event for all study duration

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactElisa Bonacina, PhD
bonacina@medacta.ch+41 91 696 60 60

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026