Class III Dental Caries
Conditions
Keywords
Glass hybrid restorative, Class III, Anterior restoration, FDI criteria
Brief summary
This is a double blinded, split mouth, randomized clinical study that evaluated the performance of a glass hybrid restorative material in class III lesions. The lesions will be restored with glass hybrid restorative (Equia Forte) or anterior composite resin (G-aenial Anterior). Restorations will be evaluated after 24 months according to FDI criteria and the data will be analyzed.
Detailed description
The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the clinical performance of a glass-hybrid-restorative with an anterior composite resin (G-aenial Anterior) in class III lesions. Participants who are 18 years of age or older and healthy, and who have applied to the Restorative Dentistry Department of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry to receive treatment for class III lesions on their front teeth will be included in the study. After explaining the purpose and conditions of the study, they will be asked to sign an informed consent form. The gender, age, and tooth numbers of the participants to be treated will be recorded. 100 upper incisors of 50 patients will be treated, with attention paid to the balanced distribution of teeth in the right and left arches. The split-mouth model will be used in the study, with two teeth included in one mouth and each restorative material placed in one tooth. The restorative material to be placed on the teeth will be determined randomly. Before starting the restoration, papers with the names of both materials will be placed in envelopes, and then the assistant staff will be asked to randomly select one of the envelopes during the restoration stage to provide randomization.Data were will be analyzed with Chi- Square, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann U tests
Interventions
PROCEDUREEquia forte HT
Restoration of anterior class III caries lesions
Sponsors
Hacettepe University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* The participant must be at least 18 years of age or older * The participant has at least two class III lesions and the lesions are in symmetrical teeth located in the right and left arch * The lesion covers at most 2/3 and at least 1/3 of the dentin * Participant voluntarily signing the informed consent form * The participant does not have a physical disability that may prevent them from coming to the control. * Absence of a periapical pathology in the involved tooth
Exclusion criteria
* Having systemic disorders that may prevent the participant from regularly attending treatment and control appointments. * Having severe periodontal problems in the tooth planned to be treated * Absence of the opposite of the tooth and not participating in chewing * Lesions which is limited with the enamel tissue * Teeth with lesions that are too large to be restored * Patients with anterior malocclusion * Patients with parafunctional habits. * Mentally disabled patients.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional properties | 2 years | The primary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the Functional properties. Visual tactile examination tools will be used for evaluating restorations according to FDI criteria by two experienced researchers at 1- week 6-, 12-, 18- and 24- months. The functional properties are scored as 1- clinically excellent, 2-clinically good, 3-clinically sufficient/satisfactory, 4-clinically unsatisfactory 5-clinically poor (replacement necesessry). Clinically 1, 2 and 3 scores are clinical acceptable but 4 and 5 scores are designated as failure. |
| Esthetic properties | 2 years | Second outcome is esthetic properties. The secondary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the Esthetic properties. Visual examination will be used for evaluating restorations according to FDI criteria by two experienced researchers at 1- week 6-, 12-, 18- and 24- months. The Esthetic properties are scored as 1- clinically excellent, 2-clinically good, 3-clinically sufficient/satisfactory, 4-clinically unsatisfactory 5-clinically poor (replacement necesessry). Clinically 1, 2 and 3 scores are clinical acceptable but 4 and 5 scores are designated as failure. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
Primary ContactUZAY Koç VURAL, PhD. DDS
Backup ContactUZAY Koç VURAL
Outcome results
None listed