Skip to content

Enhancing Psychotherapy for Veterans and Service Members With PTSD and Anxiety

Enhancing Intensive Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Veterans With PTSD and Anxiety Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05843695
Enrollment
306
Registered
2023-05-06
Start date
2023-09-22
Completion date
2027-03-30
Last updated
2026-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

PTSD, Anxiety, Veterans, Service Members, Reservists, Treatment

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different intensive formats of delivering cognitive-behavioral treatment for people with PTSD and anxiety disorders. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is iTCBT delivered in individual and group formats more effective than TAU in improving anxiety symptoms and quality of life? * For treatment non-responders, is iTCBT-Enhanced more effective than TAU improving anxiety symptoms and quality of life? * Does iTCBT-Individual produce a larger improvement in anxiety and quality of life compared with iTCBT-Group? Participants will undergo several assessments throughout the course of the study. Based on randomization, they will receive: (1) iTCBT in an individual format over a 2-week period, (2) iTCBT in a group format over a 2-day period, or (3) usual care. Those who do not show a response to treatment will receive 4 additional individual therapy sessions.

Detailed description

Anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are among the leading mental health problems in the nation and are highly prevalent among service members and Veterans. The process of recovery and reintegration across the lifespan for military personnel with PTSD and anxiety disorders remains a significant problem. Due to the debilitating nature of these disorders, resuming and participating in major life roles following deployment can be challenging and often leads to avoidance of everyday activities and social withdrawal. Consequences of untreated anxiety-based disorders range from substantial impairment in social, vocational, emotional and physical functioning to high rates of suicide. Despite the debilitating nature of posttraumatic stress and anxiety, these disorders can be successfully treated with CBT. However, relatively few Veterans take advantage of these treatments. One explanation is that individual- and systemic- level barriers to treatment engagement are inherent in the structure of standard CBT delivery formats, which require weekly appointments over a 3 to 4-month period. Furthermore, because current CBTs are disorder-specific and often do not directly address psychiatric comorbidity, individuals frequently need to seek additional treatment after completing one course of CBT. These collective barriers point to the need for improved treatment delivery methods. Transdiagnostic treatment approaches hold potential in addressing the many barriers associated with treatment engagement. Transdiagnostic approaches distill the same treatment principles embedded across different protocols for anxiety disorders and PTSD into a single protocol without targeting a specific disorder. Fear is a common element across these disorders but the source of fear and how symptoms manifest differentiates one disorder from another. Although transdiagnostic approaches show excellent potential as a single treatment for multiple disorders, few studies to date have systematically examined the effectiveness of transdiagnostic treatment with a military population. Research also indicates that service members with anxiety disorders often prefer treatment in an individual therapy format. Group treatments typically show higher rates of dropout, which supports the importance of treating anxiety using individual formats. Similarly, given the many barriers associated with the structure of traditional psychotherapy delivery, more attention in recent years has been directed at examining intensive or massed treatment approaches in delivering trauma-focused treatment. Such approaches seek to shorten the overall length of treatment by providing psychotherapy in longer and stronger doses. The proposed clinical trial tests two different delivery formats of iTCBT (Individual vs. Group) and the enhancement of iTCBT for participants who do now show significant improvement following a course of iTCBT. Veterans and service members with PTSD and anxiety will be recruited for the study. The extended version of iTCBT (iTCBT-E) will provide 6 additional hours of individual treatment over 2 weeks. Differences in outcomes between participants who receive the intervention in individual versus group formats will also be examined.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALiTCBT-I

Individual format over 2 weeks

BEHAVIORALiTCBT-G

Group format over 2 days

BEHAVIORALTAU

Standard care

Sponsors

Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER
United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Assessors who conduct 3- and 6- months follow-up evaluations will be masked to participant treatment assignment.

Intervention model description

3 treatment arms: iTCBT Individual; iTCBT Group; TAU

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veteran/Service Member at least 18 years old * Current diagnosis of at least one anxiety-based disorder: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Other Specified Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorder, Other Specified Anxiety Disorder, and Unspecified Anxiety Disorder (based on ADIS-5) * Moderate-to-poor life enjoyment and satisfaction as indicated by a score of 47 or lower on the QLES-Q-SF * Stable on psychotropic medication for 4 weeks before study participation * Willing to be randomized to treatment condition

Exclusion criteria

* Active symptoms of mania or psychosis at baseline (based on ADIS-5) * Depression with active suicidal ideation and intent that would preclude treatment (based on ADIS-5 \& BDI-II) * Moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment as indicated by the SLUMS (a score below 20) * Veterans/Service Members with comorbid substance/alcohol use or dependence are study eligible but must agree to reduce and limit their use of substances during the active course of treatment, particularly during exposure exercises. If they do not agree to this, they will be excluded * Undergoing concurrent transdiagnostic CBT specifically targeting any of the above-mentioned disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life score on the Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (QLES-Q-SF) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT conditions (Individual & Group) and TAU.6-Month Follow-UpThe QLES-Q-SF measures subjective functioning and satisfaction across a range of life domains including work, leisure activities, social relationships, and physical health. Satisfaction scores on this measure range from 14 (very poor) to 70 (very good). Higher scores indicate greater overall life satisfaction and functioning.
Change in Anxiety score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT conditions (Individual & Group) and TAU.6-Month Follow-UpThe BAI assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms across 21 items, minimizing those that overlap with depression. Two components of anxiety are measured: The cognitive subscale provides a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning, whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. The total score on the BAI ranges from 0-63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of anxiety.
Change in Quality of Life score on the Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (QLES-Q-SF) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT Enhanced (iTCBT-E) condition and TAU.6-Month Follow-UpThe QLES-Q-SF measures subjective functioning and satisfaction across a range of life domains including work, leisure activities, social relationships, and physical health. Satisfaction scores on this measure range from 14 (very poor) to 70 (very good). Higher scores indicate greater overall life satisfaction and functioning.
Change in Anxiety score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT Enhanced (iTCBT-E) condition and TAU.6-Month Follow-UpThe BAI assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms across 21 items, minimizing those that overlap with depression. Two components of anxiety are measured: The cognitive subscale provides a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning, whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. The total score on the BAI ranges from 0-63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of anxiety.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Magnitude of Change in Quality of Life score on Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (QLES-Q-SF) from Baseline to 3- and 6-Month Follow-Ups between the iTCBT Individual and Group Conditions.3- and 6-Month Follow-UpsThe QLES-Q-SF measures subjective functioning and satisfaction across a range of life domains including work, leisure activities, social relationships, and physical health. Satisfaction scores on this measure range from 14 (very poor) to 70 (very good). Higher scores indicate greater overall life satisfaction and functioning.
Magnitude of Change in Anxiety score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from Baseline to 3- and 6-Month Follow-Ups between the iTCBT Individual and Group Conditions.3- and 6-Month Follow-UpsThe BAI assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms across 21 items, minimizing those that overlap with depression. Two components of anxiety are measured: The cognitive subscale provides a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning, whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. The total score on the BAI ranges from 0-63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of anxiety.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTEllen Teng, PhD
eteng@bcm.edu(713) 791-1414
CONTACTKeri Bayley, PhD
Keri.Bayley@bcm.edu(713) 791-1414
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREllen Teng, PhD

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026