Skip to content

Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides Versus McKenzie Method in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Effects of Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides Versus McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis & Therapy in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05840666
Enrollment
170
Registered
2023-05-03
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2023-06-15
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Non-specific Low Back Pain, Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide, McKenzie Method, Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy, Range of Motion, Pain, Functional Disability, Fear Avoidance Beliefs

Brief summary

Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequent complaint encountered in clinical practice. Exercises and manual therapy prescription are common physical therapy treatments prescribed for the patients presenting with chronic low back pain. The interventions will establish the future direction for practitioners in choosing the manual therapy or repeated exercises as effective prescription and provide a basis for future research

Detailed description

A variety of treatment interventions, modalities and techniques are used in physical therapy management of non-specific low back pain including manual therapy, exercises, neural mobilizations, stretching soft tissue techniques and dry needling etc. Out of these more recent literature supports manual therapy, self exercises, patient counseling and awareness have been recommended in back pain management guidelines, in the United States and is also frequently used in clinical practice in various countries. Despite multiple theoretical frame works proposing the role of SNAGs and MDT mobilizations and exercises respectively, the literature on the true mechanism of direct or indirect physiological effects of these on performance or performance-related outcomes is vague and lacks justifiable procedural rigor. The results of this study will provide information regarding the direction for practitioners in choosing the manual therapy or repeated exercises as effective prescription and provide a basis for future research.

Interventions

OTHERMulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG)

Application of the MWM technique developed by Brian R. Mulligan. The clinical researcher will perform and holds sustained passive segmental glide at the target joint maintaining the slack whereas the patient will actively move in the direction of pain or stiffness. These MWM techniques when applied to spinal segments or joint is called sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG).

An active therapy technique involving repeated movements or sustained positions along with an educational component prescribed to the patient for of minimizing the pain and disability and increase the spinal range of motion. The method will involve the assessment of symptomatic and mechanical responses to repeated movements and sustained positions in the direction of preference. The method will be used for assessment and treatment of patients and with derangement syndrome.

OTHERConventional Physical Therapy

It includes usual physical therapy care such as Therapeutic Ultrasound, Moist Heat-pack, TENS and standard exercises.

Sponsors

Ayesha Jamil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessor will be unaware of the treatment group of study.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized to three study arms and each study arm will be allocated a different intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of Both genders * Adult patents between the 20 to 45 years of age with chronic non-specific low back pain. * Pain intensity of at least 3 or greater on 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale. * Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score equal to or greater than 20%.

Exclusion criteria

* Serious underlying pathology with red flags. * Patients having contraindication to physical exercises. * Females with high parity. * Pregnant or lactating females. * Patients who participated in any type of rehabilitative training or exercise program for back pain in last 1 month. * Spinal deformity or Spinal stenosis. * History of fall or trauma to spine in last one year. * History of spinal, abdominal or hip surgery. * Signs of nerve root compression with sensory, motor or deep tendon reflexes deficit. * Serious underlying pathology with red flags. * Systemic disease e.g., cardiovascular, metabolic or central nervous system. * Osteopenia, osteoporosis. * Medication's history (steroids, immunosuppressants, chemotherapy) * Limb length discrepancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain IntensityPain intensity will be recorded as baseline at the time of recruitment and change in pain intensity will be observed at follow up at the end of 3rd week of treatment.Level of pain intensity will be measured using Numeric Rating Scale. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing no pain to '10' representing the extreme pain
Lumbar Range of MotionLumbar Range of Motion will be observed as baseline at the time of recruitment and change in ROM will be observed at follow up at end of 3rd week of treatment.Lumbar Range of motion will be measured using inclinometers. Normal lumbar range of motion include 60 degrees of flexion, 25 degrees of extension, and 25 degrees of lateral bending
Level of Functional DisabilityFunctional Disability will be recorded as baseline at the time of recruitment and change in score of functional disability will be recorded at the end of 3rd week of treatment.Functional Disability will be measured with the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. The scores range from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability.
Change in Fear Avoidance BeliefsFear Avoidance Beliefs will be observed as baseline at the time of recruitment and any change in Fear Avoidance Beliefs will be observed at the end of 3rd week of treatment.Fear Avoidance Beliefs will be observed using Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. There is a maximum score of 96. A higher score indicates more strongly held fear avoidance beliefs.
Change in Muscle Activation of Lumbar Multifidus (LM) and Transversus Abdominis (TrA)The Thickness of muscles will be recorded as baseline at the time of recruitment and change in thickness representing activation will be measured at follow up at the end of 3rd week of treatment.Muscle Activation of Lumbar Multifidus (LM) and Transversus Abdominis (TrA) will be measured with Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI).The activation of muscle is represented through change in thickness level of muscle observed through RUSI. The normal thickness of TrA is 3.93mm and LM is 28.99mm.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026