Skip to content

Effect of Laser Biostimulation With Mandibular Ridge Splitting and Peek Overdenture

Effect of Laser Bio-stimulation on Peri-implant Tissue Health for Mandibular Knife-edge Ridges Managed With One- Stage Ridge Splitting and Two- Implant Mandibular PEEK Overdentures. A One -Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05837078
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-05-01
Start date
2019-04-20
Completion date
2022-10-19
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ridge Splitting

Keywords

peek , laser

Brief summary

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of two-implant retained polyetheretherketone (PEEK) overdentures on reducing the transmitted forces on implants placed with ridge splitting either treated with laser biostimulation or not.

Detailed description

This randomised controlled trial was executed on 18 completely edentulous patients from the Outpatient Clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry at Mansoura University in Egypt.

Interventions

PROCEDUREridge splitting with implant placement

ridge splitting of mandibular denture followed by two implant placement

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- eligible patients must have mandibular knife edge ridge

Exclusion criteria

* contraindicated any systemic disease preventing surgical intervention such as bone metabollic disease , diabetes mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
crestal bone lossone yearmeasuring marginal bone loss arround dental implants in mm by digital radiograph
plaque indexOne yearscore 0 = no plaque; score1 = plaque only detected with a probe; score 2 = plaque visible to the naked eye; score 3 = abundant plaque1111
bleeding indexone yearscore 0: no bleeding when using a periodontal probe; score1: isolated bleeding spots visible; score 2: a confluent red line of blood along the mucosal margin; score 3: heavy or profuse bleeding).
gingival indexone yearScore 0: normal peri implant mucosa; score 1: mild inflammation, slight colour change, and slight edoema; score 2: moderate inflammation, redness, edoema, and glazing; and score 3: severe inflammation, marked redness and edoema, and ulceration.
probing depthone yearA periodontal probe was used to measure pocket depth (PD). The distance between the marginal border of the mucosa and the tip of the periodontal probe at the base of the gingival sulcus was scored as the probing depth.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026